ThePiombino
The OG "TP"
- Messages
- 16,476
- Reaction score
- 6,245
My apologies. I did a quick scan and thought it hadn't been posted yet.
Unbelievable. And to think that when Deontay flipped I blamed Denbrock, assuming that he, like Cooks, had failed to check in often enough.
Donny was a good recruit for Houston, but he was no where near Greenberry. Donny was a three star WR, ranked #91 receiver in the country by scout. Greenberry was the 7th best receiver and a five star.
Apples and Oranges
The original question was to name a UH receiver who recently made it to the NFL. Had nothing to do with recruiting rankings.
If anything, your point just makes attending UH seem like an even better decision -- if a lowly "#91" can crack the top of the 2nd round, imagine what DG will do.
Originally Posted by irishpat183
Name ONE other UofH WR that has done what you have just summerized in your post....
Originally Posted by IrishLax
PS. Greenberry saved our asses. No idea what exactly happened on that visit to Houston, the more I look at this decision, the more I get it. 3 years at Houston starting and destroying Conference USA in an air raid offense => NFL. It's a football first decision.
Donnie Avery. #33 pick in the draft a few years ago.
Tate, Floyd, shark if he wanted, Rema, Arnaz, Maurice Stovall, Grimes (practice squad). All wr thst got to or will get to the NFL.
Houston. Only Avery?
Just another way to look at it.
Donnie Avery went to Houston because it was his best offer. He wasn't a 5-star stud with offers to anywhere in the country, he chose his best overall option. The original question wasn't "who from Houston went to the nfl", it was:
and this is what was summarized that he wanted him to name:
Donnie Avery didn't choose Houston because he knew it was a place where the offense would allow him to take advantage of less talented players in a pass happy offense. He didn't pick it because he thought it was the easiest route to the NFL. Shoot, he didn't even choose it because of an "air raid offense" (it wasn't that type of offense in 2003). He chose it because it was his best option to play college football. Deontay chose it for a completely different reason.
Exactly. It's as if we don't send guys to the NFL at the WR position.......
Hmmmmm...Play for UofH immediately in ConUSA and get 100 catches a year in front of high school like crowds every weekend with no shot at a nat title? Or play for ND(and there is a chance to start), get a better education, play on a national stage every week, possibly play for a nat title in a few seasons and get better exposure?
No brainer. UofH all the way. Again, something is screwy here. There is no good reason why he'd go to UofH.
The grumblings i've been hearing ALREADY, is that there were some "promises" made. Some shady ones. Some having to do with class work.
I am honestly just waiting for that WR coach he has a connection with to leave for a better gig. Would make it even funnier if he found a job before the season even began.
As I recall, the guy JUST got there along with the new head coach in the last few weeks or so
The grumblings i've been hearing ALREADY, is that there were some "promises" made. Some shady ones.
Why do we have to continue to make nefarious suggestions about this? I agree that it's rather mind-blowing that Greenberry chose Houston over Notre Dame, but maybe, just maybe, it went down as he's said it did?
This is a kid who committed to Notre Dame before he ever visited, largely because his cousin wanted to go there. From at least some people's descriptions, he may not have been the personality type who'd naturally gravitate to a program and university like Notre Dame. Then, his senior year, his recruiting stock blew up and he started getting other offers.
He stayed committed, because of Tee, because he didn't like USC, because he felt like he should. He said all the right things. But he kept taking visits. Arizona State. USC. Maybe UCLA. As discussed, that's not what you do if you're really solid. Late in the process, his feet start getting colder. Maybe this "our way or the highway" coach at this Catholic U in northern Indiana isn't for him. This coach he likes at Houston is on him to visit. It's low-stakes, not like USC or a last-minute flip to some big-name program. He visits. And, lo, decides he's more comfortable in the smaller pond of Houston, where he can be a stud but not in the spotlight. Do it on his own, instead of following his cousin. Play a few years, and go for the league. Why not?
I don't know. I've no inside knowledge at all, just what I've read. But I can see this scenario in the mind of an 18-year-old. I'd like to think the best of him. It happens. And, really, doesn't suggesting that "promises" are the only reason Greenberry might flip make us seem a little cheap? Notre Dame's not for everybody, and maybe Greenberry realized that. So let's go win with the guys we've got, no?
I agree with what you said and point out that this is the way the country has devolved in the last twenty years. Self first, self only. Many people--not just kids but adults, too--don't care to be a part of something, they want to be the thing independent of other parts. I know a lot of young people and I think one of the best ways this can be illustrated is by asking who their favorite team is in any given sport. You will most often find the answer to be that they don't like any teams, just certain players.Why do we have to continue to make nefarious suggestions about this? I agree that it's rather mind-blowing that Greenberry chose Houston over Notre Dame, but maybe, just maybe, it went down as he's said it did?
This is a kid who committed to Notre Dame before he ever visited, largely because his cousin wanted to go there. From at least some people's descriptions, he may not have been the personality type who'd naturally gravitate to a program and university like Notre Dame. Then, his senior year, his recruiting stock blew up and he started getting other offers.
He stayed committed, because of Tee, because he didn't like USC, because he felt like he should. He said all the right things. But he kept taking visits. Arizona State. USC. Maybe UCLA. As discussed, that's not what you do if you're really solid. Late in the process, his feet start getting colder. Maybe this "our way or the highway" coach at this Catholic U in northern Indiana isn't for him. This coach he likes at Houston is on him to visit. It's low-stakes, not like USC or a last-minute flip to some big-name program. He visits. And, lo, decides he's more comfortable in the smaller pond of Houston, where he can be a stud but not in the spotlight. Do it on his own, instead of following his cousin. Play a few years, and go for the league. Why not?
I don't know. I've no inside knowledge at all, just what I've read. But I can see this scenario in the mind of an 18-year-old. I'd like to think the best of him. It happens. And, really, doesn't suggesting that "promises" are the only reason Greenberry might flip make us seem a little cheap? Notre Dame's not for everybody, and maybe Greenberry realized that. So let's go win with the guys we've got, no?
I agree with what you said and point out that this is the way the country has devolved in the last twenty years. Self first, self only. Many people--not just kids but adults, too--don't care to be a part of something, they want to be the thing independent of other parts. I know a lot of young people and I think one of the best ways this can be illustrated is by asking who their favorite team is in any given sport. You will most often find the answer to be that they don't like any teams, just certain players.
I watched the Namath documentary on HBO the other night and wondered to myself if Namath was perhaps the genesis of the phenoma of self above all else.