'12 VA S C.J. Prosise (Notre Dame Signed LOI)

C

cLaRk_JoNeS

Banned
Messages
451
Reaction score
36
Are there no highlights of him playing RB? Thats what i see when watching, someone who should be tried at rb.
 
GoldenIsThyFame

GoldenIsThyFame

Well-known member
Messages
10,899
Reaction score
789
“@rivalsmike: #NotreDame DB CJ Prosise here at Chesapeake Bowl but apparently injured and will not participate”
 
PANDFAN

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
GoldenIsThyFame said:
“@rivalsmike: #NotreDame DB CJ Prosise here at Chesapeake Bowl but apparently injured and will not participate”
Click to expand...

why oh why do we always seem to get the bad breaks!!! what the hell ever happened to the luck of the irish!
 
Ironman8

Ironman8

Jaqen H'ghar
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
902
BK is reeling in players with HOPS:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bGmOQmA8_w0?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
M

Me2SouthBend

Guest
From Inside the Irish. Love this kid.
CJ PROSISE
High School: Woodberry Forest School — Woodberry Forest, Virginia
Measureables: Six-foot-three, 195-pounds
Other major offers: Boston College, Maryland, North Carolina, Penn State, Virginia, Virginia Tech, Wisconsin
Fun Fact: Finished second in the state of Virginia with a 100m dash of 10.9 seconds.
On choosing Notre Dame: ”I can’t wait to be around the great tradition and being part of a winning program,” Prosise told BlueandGold.com. “I’m ready to help bring the National Championship back to South Bend.”
What he’ll bring to the defense: Prosise is another under-the-radar recruit, but the more you dig in the more you like what you see. Looking for speed? He finished second in the state in the 100m dash. Looking for special teams ability? Prosise had five return touchdowns this season alone. Prosise had six interceptions during his senior season, where he was named Central Virginia’s defensive player of the year. He’s a tall and rangy athlete that at the very least could come in immediately and help in special teams. It’ll be interesting to see if Prosise is a good enough athlete to excel in coverage, which would make an athlete of his size even more valuable.
 
NDPhilly

NDPhilly

Philly Torqued
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
16,721
He's 6'3" now!!!??? And to those who questioned his speed just look at that. Wow. We have found our future FS.
 
IrishLax

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
He is NOT 6'3" unless he just grew a bunch. 6'1.5" from what I've heard.
 
FLDomer

FLDomer

Polish Hammer
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
510
Quick question, looking at some of our recruits measurables and how accurate are the 40 times?? C.J. runs 4.71, a lil slow and Turner runs a 4.8...ouch! Any chance they move these guys to LB?
 
M

Me2SouthBend

Guest
FLDomer said:
Quick question, looking at some of our recruits measurables and how accurate are the 40 times?? C.J. runs 4.71, a lil slow and Turner runs a 4.8...ouch! Any chance they move these guys to LB?
Click to expand...

Look back 1 page. He finished 2nd in his state in the 100 meters running a 10.9. I don't think he runs a 4.71 40. Althought that would make him faster than quick and Mayock would be screwed.
 
C

cLaRk_JoNeS

Banned
Messages
451
Reaction score
36
FLDomer said:
Quick question, looking at some of our recruits measurables and how accurate are the 40 times?? C.J. runs 4.71, a lil slow and Turner runs a 4.8...ouch! Any chance they move these guys to LB?
Click to expand...

where did u see these 40 times? Also keep in mind unless these kids run track, they dont know the proper technique to run a 40. Some of the pros at combines still have trouble after spending time and money working on it.

I personally dont understand why they dont time a 40 yard or w/e amount using the way they stand on a football field. WR standing, rbs squatting a lil then go left or right and explode, dline in 3 point stance.
 
J

johnnykillz

Guest
cLaRk_JoNeS said:
an inch and a half isnt a bunch of a difference, thats what the ladies tell me atleast. :sad:
Click to expand...

The difference in a 4.4 and a 4.8 is a tremendous distance. I want to say between 5 and 10 yards, closer to 10 yards in a forty.

Now articulate that to a field length. We're talking 20 to thirty yards of distance. Blown away.
 
FLDomer

FLDomer

Polish Hammer
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
510
cLaRk_JoNeS said:
where did u see these 40 times? Also keep in mind unless these kids run track, they dont know the proper technique to run a 40. Some of the pros at combines still have trouble after spending time and money working on it.

I personally dont understand why they dont time a 40 yard or w/e amount using the way they stand on a football field. WR standing, rbs squatting a lil then go left or right and explode, dline in 3 point stance.
Click to expand...

I got those #s from ESPN, I was just asking dont kill me for asking!
 
bigedefense

bigedefense

New member
Messages
734
Reaction score
109
Also, you have to take into account the weather when these times were taken. I know it sounds silly, but it plays a huge role in times. I have seen my guys at track meets run up to .2 slower when it is cool (55 degrees or less), and the barometer is dropping. I have no scientific evidence other than I note weather conditions on my charts for each meet and when the weather is cool and baro. is dropping, all of my times are slower than warm days when the barometer is rising.

A side note; there are a ton of kids that run a "4.4" if you listen to their coaches, but when they are timed by someone else, its usually closer to a 4.6 or 4.7. I am sure that their are a lot of you guys on here that know this better than I, I am just putting my two cents in on it because I laugh when I hear forty times. When I watched the Semper Fi combine this year, most of the times were pretty slow. The announcers alluded to the fact that the temperatures were cool and a front was moving thru. So, if Prosise was timed in bad conditions, its a pretty good time, I think.
 
Whiskeyjack

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
FLDomer said:
Quick question, looking at some of our recruits measurables and how accurate are the 40 times?? C.J. runs 4.71, a lil slow and Turner runs a 4.8...ouch! Any chance they move these guys to LB?
Click to expand...

Turner allegedly ran a 4.5 40 for ND's coaches and, IIRC, his Shuttle time is sub-4.0. That's how he earned his offered.

Over the last two cycles, this staff has only brought in 3:s: players that at least have the athleticism to challenge the 4:s: and 5:s: guys.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Some of the forty times are old too; like from sophomore or junior year.

John Turner ran (more than one) 4.5 forty for the coaches.

Nick Baratti ran a laser timed 4.45 forty that has been widely viewed on this site.

CJ ran a 10.9 one hundred. How fast are the Atkinson brothers and Bennett Jackson? I know there is a much faster reputable forty time out there for CJ; I just haven't taken time to find it.

Maybe that 40 time is why ESPN neglected CJ's rating so badly . . .

I am trying to remember, but it seems that the difference between a 4.4 and a 4.5 forty for six foot runners was about two thirds of a stride, a yard, give or take.

More important is the method of timing. A starter’s pistol can cost 0.25 second. The difference between manual, manual start, electronic finish (NFL method), and laser timed (runner self-starts against laser at both ends) can be as much as 0.5 seconds.

For example, Nicky Baratti's 4.45 laser time (could but isn't) be as slow as a 4.95 forty. So all of these times are apples to bananas; saucy enough?
 
Last edited:
FLDomer

FLDomer

Polish Hammer
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
510
Whiskeyjack said:
Turner allegedly ran a 4.5 40 for ND's coaches and, IIRC, his Shuttle time is sub-4.0. That's how he earned his offered.

Over the last two cycles, this staff has only brought in 3:s: players that at least have the athleticism to challenge the 4:s: and 5:s: guys.
Click to expand...

Now those numbers are much better!! I was just a little rattled when I saw the terrible ESPN #s, although if it was an F$U recruit Im sure they would have reported lower times...lol

I trust Kelly and crew are pretty good evaluaters of talent!
 
Last edited:
bigedefense

bigedefense

New member
Messages
734
Reaction score
109
Bogtrotter07 said:
Some of the forty times are old too; like from sophomore or junior year.

John Turner ran (more than one) 4.5 forty for the coaches.

Nick Baratti ran a laser timed 4.45 forty that has been widely viewed on this site.

CJ ran a 10.9 one hundred. How fast are the Atkinson brothers and Bennett Jackson? I know there is a much faster reputable forty time out there for CJ; I just haven't taken time to find it.

Maybe that 40 time is why ESPN neglected CJ's rating so badly . . .

I am trying to remember, but it seems that the difference between a 4.4 and a 4.5 forty for six foot runners was about two thirds of a stride, a yard, give or take.

More important is the method of timing. A starter’s pistol can cost 0.25 second. The difference between manual, manual start, electronic finish (NFL method), and laser timed (runner self-starts against laser at both ends) can be as much as 0.5 seconds.

For example, Nicky Baratti's 4.45 laser time (could but isn't) be as slow as a 4.95 forty. So all of these times are apples to bananas; saucy enough?
Click to expand...



Also, it depends on how you use a stopwatch. Using the thumb is regarded as the wrong way to do it, as your thumb reaction time is slower. I promise I am not making this up. I heard a track coach speaking on this topic a couple of years ago. According to him, when timing the forty, if the coach uses his thumb to start the time, the reaction will be between .05 to .2 seconds slower to start because of the distance of the runner. (I wish I could think of this guys name!!) He says the time will be close at the finish, but still somewhat slower than if using the index finger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top