woolybug25
#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
- Messages
- 17,677
- Reaction score
- 3,018
It's no Catch 22. Verbal commitments aren't binding only the LOI is. ND offers (and other school's) are explicit that the scholarship is contingent on meeting the academic requirements. Every year some kids decide to cruise through their senior year or second semester senior year and don't get into their chosen school. I don't recall it happening at ND (kudos to Admission's Screening Process). I do recall a few like Aldo De La Garza who wanted ND badly and kept pluggin their senior year but didn't make it academically. ND chose others on NSD. There were two in Holtz's '95 class that he tried to slide through Admissions at the 11th hour. Both were reported by the services on NSD as in ND's Class but neither had cleared ND Admissions and NEVER did.
Marcus Rios isn't the first prospect to be told add a course, take one over and improve a grade, or retake and improve a Test score. Carson Palmer chose not to and took the easy route to Southern Cal. WR David Terrell verballed to ND but balked at academic improvement and flipped to UM. More power to Rios if he takes the tougher route and succeeds. The choice is his. This is one of life's character building moments for prospects, coaches, and administrators.
Buena suerte, Marcus!
I know that a verbal isn't binding. What I was getting at is what you addressed in your second paragraph. It would make me a bit worried if he was a verbal contingent on him passing a class that ended after signing day. The reason being, we would most likely miss out on other prospects because of the assumed ability of Rios filling it. If the language class ended up being too tough, then he could possibly go the route of Palmer or Terrell and leave us one CB short.
I know that if he verballed and started the foreign language class that he would most likely end up Irish, it just makes me nervous to get verbal commitments of kids that currently aren't eligible to attend the university.
We all remember Randy Moss, right?