irishtrinity
New member
- Messages
- 1,154
- Reaction score
- 48
Don't understand ever turning away a 5 star defensive player.... Trust me we need him we need all the guys we can get....
Don't understand ever turning away a 5 star defensive player.... Trust me we need him we need all the guys we can get....
Sorry bud I trust the coaches more and they obviously don't need him.
To me, based on the conditions on the ground and our depth at DLine , I have no issue whatsoever calling up Schutt and re-opening the offer, Chase Hounshell style. I would always err on the side of D-lineman, especially one who could potentially play OG. If we got Schutt and still got Armistead, Schutt or Jones could play OLine.
I posted this on another string, but it belongs here.
I don't think our staff's opinion is so clear cut. I see it a little different:
(1) We initially had 2-3 DLine spots, one or two were reserved for an Armistead/Jones type monster DE, one for everyone else, especially interior linemen.
(2) We liked Schutt and Day, among others, and offered both as an interior lineman
(3) Day beat Schutt to the punch
Plus...
(4) When we passed on Schutt, our situation was different:
- our likely 5th year list was different.
- our Commitment/Prospect list was different.
- Shwenke looked like a sure-fire rotation player.
To me, based on the conditions on the ground and our depth at DLine , I have no issue whatsoever calling up Schutt and re-opening the offer, Chase Hounshell style. I would always err on the side of D-lineman, especially one who could potentially play OG. If we got Schutt and still got Armistead, Schutt or Jones could play OLine.
Just because we reopen his offer doesn't mean he is willing to come to ND anymore. We may have changed his opinion permanently.
Maybe, but scUM pulled theirs too. PSU was his best option at the time and he verballed because he felt like he was running out of time to go to a premier program (bizarre situation for a 5*). He looked like he was going to commit to us before getting his offer pulled, then scUM followed suit. I'm betting that Kelly is savvy enough to explain the situation to him and get him on board. I'de lay a bet on it.
I wouldn't say never, its very similar to the Chase Hounshel situation from last year.
I grew up about ten mintues from Mr. Schutt and from what i was told there's no way. Staff just liked Sheldon and Jarron more. Time to move on.
Michigan missed on a DT they thought they were going to land so I could see him going there..... that would suck hard.
Danny Obrein homie.Wasn't Pipkins their target?
Could he really forgive us? I'd certainly take him but MSU is the one out of those 3 that didn't tell him not to come.
Could he really forgive us? I'd certainly take him but MSU is the one out of those 3 that didn't tell him not to come.
Tuitt and can't Day and Jones also rotoate inside?I'd take him. Assuming we bring back Cwynar, we'll still be 4-deep at NT in 2012 without Schutt, but 2013 could be scary if we skip on a NT completely this year. With Cwynar gone and Stockton unlikely to get a 5Y, we'd be down to just Nix, Springmann, and any true freshman we bring in next cycle.
Much could depend on how frequently the staff plans to use Tuitt at NT. Tuitt's flexibility likely makes Schutt a luxury.