He's an option for KR and will likely continue seeing practice reps at the position, but Riddick and Jackson are the top two at the moment.
Thank you for the info sir!
He's an option for KR and will likely continue seeing practice reps at the position, but Riddick and Jackson are the top two at the moment.
I'll bet a bunch of money that nobody returns the second half kickoff for Notre Dame, maybe all year long. Who knows why??
I'll bet a bunch of money that nobody returns the second half kickoff for Notre Dame, maybe all year long. Who knows why??
Predictions:
Notre Dame 31
South Florida 16
I'll bet a bunch of money that nobody returns the second half kickoff for Notre Dame, maybe all year long. Who knows why??
But take it to the bank Notre Dame will blow them away We should do the same thing with Michigan and Michigan State. and would have last year but for bad breaks.
They've got some returning starters and Skip Hotz has been known to get results against big programs, even on opening day. Everyone remember his time at East Carolina? I think ND could win handily, if things go right for them, but I see the Bulls keeping it relatively close. I won't go for an ND loss, but I can't forsee a blowout, especially in the first game. 31-14, with a fourth quarter TD and field goal from ND putitng it away.
There are indeed reasons why USF may end up being a close game, but returning starters isn't one of them. USF returns only 12 of 24 starters from 2010, which ranks them 112th among FBS schools.
That's reason #1 USF fans should be very worried about this game (and most of 2011 tbh), but I've yet to read a post from one recognizing the enormity of this disadvantage. Instead, it's the stock "but all the guys behind those starters are better!1one"
Really? Then why weren't they starting last year?
I think they mean the new player was rated as being more talented, like Lynch vs. Ethan Johnson. But, I'd be pretty worried if half my team was new, 3 or 4 talented guys can excel with 7-8 returning starters, but a gang of new blood running around could be ugly, especially game 1. Im sure SF will be much improved, and a significantly better defense by week 10
Here is my thought on this, which is pretty much the same thing that you are saying. Even if they feel that their new players are going to be better, it doesn't necessarily translate into the defense playing better.
Consider our lineup. By no means do their new players have the potential of our new players, but imagine if we were starting Tuitt, Nix, Lynch and Ishaq because of lack of depth and returning starters. Sure we would be excited about their potential, but we would be extremely concerned about their lack of experience and our depth behind them. Defense, especially on the front seven, is all about gap responsibility and performing "your role". Pair that with depth, and you have the necessary players to perfom at a high level. That's what makes dominant front 7's. While that future front is exciting to us, there wont be many of us that would want that to be our starting lineup on Sep 3rd...