2026 Transfer Portal - General

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,105
Reaction score
27,367


Grok Summary:

**Summary of the tweet by @mckenzielaw (posted Jan 20, 2026):**

The author (an IP lawyer and Duke alum) believes **Duke has a very strong case on the merits** in its NIL contract dispute with quarterback Darian Mensah. The contract clearly gave Duke exclusive NIL rights through Dec 2026, prohibited Mensah from contacting/negotiating with other schools or enrolling elsewhere, and required prompt notice of any third-party contact—promises he allegedly broke by engaging with Miami, entering the transfer portal, and announcing his departure without notice. The breach looks straightforward and the contract enforceable under NC law.

However, he is **skeptical about Duke obtaining a temporary restraining order (TRO)**:
- Without the contract's clause where Mensah admits any breach causes Duke "irreparable harm with no adequate remedy at law," the TRO would have almost no chance.
- Even with that clause, the author doubts a true emergency exists since the 2026 season is months away, allowing time for a full preliminary injunction hearing.
- The contract caps damages at roughly **$4 million** (the amount Duke paid Mensah), waives other categories of damages, and makes the harm readily calculable / monetary — which traditionally undermines claims of "irreparable" (non-compensable) injury needed for emergency injunctive relief. This cap ironically hurts Duke's TRO argument.

He highlights the contract's **striking asymmetry** (impressive but potentially troubling): Duke can seek court injunctions to stop Mensah's breach, while Mensah's only remedy against Duke is limited to monetary damages via arbitration — no injunctions allowed against Duke. Courts will likely enforce this one-sided term as a bargained-for agreement, though Mensah's side will challenge it hard.

Overall: Duke should win the underlying dispute easily, but getting immediate emergency relief (TRO) to block the transfer / Miami move is far less certain due to the monetary damages cap and lack of genuine time pressure. The post includes a screenshot (likely of relevant contract language or the complaint).
 

NDPhilly

Philly Torqued
Messages
16,441
Reaction score
16,721
Insane this is Miami’s master plan for a QB next year. Maybe go for an obtainable guy like Hoover instead of just absolutely whiffing on the top guys.
 

Rocketman84

Well-known member
Messages
2,425
Reaction score
1,206
I think all of us are assume things, but is the idea that agents are shopping their clients that bizarre?

What the fuck is Miami supposed to do in that situation? Not answer the email/call/text? If the Duke QB's agent calls to see if there is interest in his client, and Miami has interest, are they supposed to say "no, the timing is wrong"?

People want to... cry for Duke? Shake their tiny fist at the sky and clutch their pearls for the sanctity of cfb? If it's within the rules, but you want to then say "not like that"... probably should fix the rule.
So what good is a contract if you don't have to abide by it and can breach it after 10 months.

You might want to get ready for the lawsuit coming that Duke is going to win.
 

Rocketman84

Well-known member
Messages
2,425
Reaction score
1,206


Grok Summary:

**Summary of the tweet by @mckenzielaw (posted Jan 20, 2026):**

The author (an IP lawyer and Duke alum) believes **Duke has a very strong case on the merits** in its NIL contract dispute with quarterback Darian Mensah. The contract clearly gave Duke exclusive NIL rights through Dec 2026, prohibited Mensah from contacting/negotiating with other schools or enrolling elsewhere, and required prompt notice of any third-party contact—promises he allegedly broke by engaging with Miami, entering the transfer portal, and announcing his departure without notice. The breach looks straightforward and the contract enforceable under NC law.

However, he is **skeptical about Duke obtaining a temporary restraining order (TRO)**:
- Without the contract's clause where Mensah admits any breach causes Duke "irreparable harm with no adequate remedy at law," the TRO would have almost no chance.
- Even with that clause, the author doubts a true emergency exists since the 2026 season is months away, allowing time for a full preliminary injunction hearing.
- The contract caps damages at roughly **$4 million** (the amount Duke paid Mensah), waives other categories of damages, and makes the harm readily calculable / monetary — which traditionally undermines claims of "irreparable" (non-compensable) injury needed for emergency injunctive relief. This cap ironically hurts Duke's TRO argument.

He highlights the contract's **striking asymmetry** (impressive but potentially troubling): Duke can seek court injunctions to stop Mensah's breach, while Mensah's only remedy against Duke is limited to monetary damages via arbitration — no injunctions allowed against Duke. Courts will likely enforce this one-sided term as a bargained-for agreement, though Mensah's side will challenge it hard.

Overall: Duke should win the underlying dispute easily, but getting immediate emergency relief (TRO) to block the transfer / Miami move is far less certain due to the monetary damages cap and lack of genuine time pressure. The post includes a screenshot (likely of relevant contract language or the complaint).

Where is jprue24 so he can read this?
 

NDMatt91

Well-known member
Messages
3,533
Reaction score
3,453
So Miami is literally throwing all their eggs in the Duke kids basket?
Yes, they are beyond desperate. They whiffed on all of the top-tier QB's they went after and Cristobal and his staff have a bad track record of developing QB's that they signed out of HS.
 

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,518
Reaction score
3,263
The contract caps damages at roughly **$4 million** (the amount Duke paid Mensah), waives other categories of damages, and makes the harm readily calculable / monetary — which traditionally undermines claims of "irreparable" (non-compensable) injury needed for emergency injunctive relief. This cap ironically hurts Duke's TRO argument.

Did Duke pay this kid $4M a couple weeks ago when he signed?
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
So what good is a contract if you don't have to abide by it and can breach it after 10 months.

You might want to get ready for the lawsuit coming that Duke is going to win.
Are we changing the subject from tampering to contract law? Because my post was about tampering.

I've said elsewhere in this thread that we have a robust legal system for contracts that can and will handle what you are now whining about.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Which kind, endorsement deals or revenue sharing contracts? We just saw Washington's QB decide it wasn't worth breaking his revenue sharing contract. I think our system has a robust legal process to handle disputes over revenue sharing contracts.

NIL deals are basically the same endorsement deals we see in all professional sports.

The money isn't going away and cfb is a ruthless year round business that isn't going to pause unless something bigger makes it.
Hey make sure @Rocketman84 sees this
 

tirishman505

Well-known member
Messages
163
Reaction score
294
Did Duke pay this kid $4M a couple weeks ago when he signed?
IANAL, but I imagine that Duke's lawyers will cite asymmetrical nature of the portal in support of their injunctive relief. Basically, Mensah waited until the last minute to enter the portal, greatly limiting Duke's options to find a equitable replacement for his services, whereas he is now free to entertain any offers from any school from now until the season starts. It'll less about the dollar amount than the timing, which as far as i understand it has changed since he signed (this is his 2nd of a 2 year deal). That'll be the "irreparable" part.
 

The Backer

Well-known member
Messages
260
Reaction score
525
IANAL, but I imagine that Duke's lawyers will cite asymmetrical nature of the portal in support of their injunctive relief. Basically, Mensah waited until the last minute to enter the portal, greatly limiting Duke's options to find a equitable replacement for his services, whereas he is now free to entertain any offers from any school from now until the season starts. It'll less about the dollar amount than the timing, which as far as i understand it has changed since he signed (this is his 2nd of a 2 year deal). That'll be the "irreparable" part.

I wonder if Duke would attempt to cite lost potential playoff revenue as well as part of their damages. They did win the ACC…
 

IRISHDODGER

Blue Chip Recruit
Messages
8,044
Reaction score
6,107
I have no insights on this case so I’ll just go w/ the trend where courts usually side w/ the player. Duke will lose this case & Miami will have their new QB
 

tirishman505

Well-known member
Messages
163
Reaction score
294
I have no insights on this case so I’ll just go w/ the trend where courts usually side w/ the player. Duke will lose this case & Miami will have their new QB
I actually think that Duke will win the case, but "lose" also, because they won't get the TRO and Mensah will play his season for Miami before this ever gets decided in court. Remember, Miami has yet to get to discovery (which will happen this March) in the tortious interference case brought by Wisconsin over Xavier Lucas, who has played his year at Miami and will be off to draft. Tho I do imagine that case will be referenced by Duke.
 

BeatSC

Well-known member
Messages
4,443
Reaction score
1,375
Saw this on a Duke board. Apparently this was in the contract:

19402-926897007127b8741be057fb5d15c2ee.jpg
Looks solid to me. Maybe he was a minor when he signed it? How about under the influence of some Mary Jane? Obviously I don’t want Miami to get another ringer for next year but we will beat them like a drum regardless.
 

MacIrish75

The New Logo is a Jinx
Messages
9,195
Reaction score
17,740
IANAL, but I imagine that Duke's lawyers will cite asymmetrical nature of the portal in support of their injunctive relief. Basically, Mensah waited until the last minute to enter the portal, greatly limiting Duke's options to find a equitable replacement for his services, whereas he is now free to entertain any offers from any school from now until the season starts. It'll less about the dollar amount than the timing, which as far as i understand it has changed since he signed (this is his 2nd of a 2 year deal). That'll be the "irreparable" part.
ngl I missed the rest of this post bc I was trying to figure out what “I ANAL” meant…
 

IrishTusker

Well-known member
Messages
1,706
Reaction score
1,771
Imo, a court is not likely to make Mensah play for Duke or forbid him playing for Miami. (Of course, he might decide to do that.) The fight will be about how much money he/Miami will have to pay Duke. Duke might argue it should more than 'normal' in this situation because the timing of his breach of contract left them in the lurch vis-a-vis finding a QB.
 

Rocketman84

Well-known member
Messages
2,425
Reaction score
1,206
Are we changing the subject from tampering to contract law? Because my post was about tampering.

I've said elsewhere in this thread that we have a robust legal system for contracts that can and will handle what you are now whining about.
By the very definition it's tampering, it was done secretively on Miami's end and Mensah violated the terms of his contract by not only speaking with them but by not notifying Duke officials with 48 hours
 

jerseyborn1971

Well-known member
Messages
181
Reaction score
356
This is a lynchpin moment in college football. If this goes against Duke, it signals an absolute free for all where players don't have to honor any NIL contracts and schools can do whatever they want to go after any player whenever they want. The portal rules themselves can just be blown up. Leave anytime you want as long as you the new school pays the damages...eventually.
 
Top