Movies you just saw

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,485
Reaction score
14,223
I used ChatGPT to recast my favorite film.

This cast is awesome. I'd see this movie:

Recasting The Pope of Greenwich Village (1984) for 2025 is an exciting creative exercise, especially given the film’s strong character dynamics, gritty New York vibe, and blend of crime and drama. Here's a modern take, considering current actors who could embody the same charisma, volatility, and emotional depth.


🎬 The Pope of Greenwich Village (2025 Recast)

Original Role: Charlie Moran (played by Mickey Rourke)

  • 2025 Recast: Timothée Chalamet
    • Why: Chalamet can capture Charlie’s charm, ambition, and slow unraveling under pressure. His recent performances show he can blend cocky swagger with real emotional vulnerability.

Original Role: Paulie (played by Eric Roberts)

  • 2025 Recast: Jeremy Allen White
    • Why: Known for The Bear, White can bring raw, chaotic energy to the role of Paulie—a lovable screw-up with delusions of grandeur. He has that unpredictable, nervous intensity Eric Roberts nailed.

Original Role: Diane (played by Daryl Hannah)

  • 2025 Recast: Sydney Sweeney
    • Why: She brings a grounded but sensual presence, and can play a complex, emotionally invested woman stuck in a tough relationship. She’d update Diane with modern grit.

Original Role: Bed Bug Eddie (played by Burt Young)

  • 2025 Recast: Bobby Cannavale
    • Why: Cannavale has the presence and menace to play a neighborhood mobster who’s dangerous without being cartoonish. He'd be scary but still feel “local.”

Original Role: Barney (played by Kenneth McMillan)

  • 2025 Recast: Brendan Gleeson
    • Why: Gleeson would crush the role of the old-school safecracker with wisdom and world-weariness, bringing a tragic dignity to the part.

🎥 Director: David Michôd

  • Why: Known for Animal Kingdom and The King, he has a knack for crime, character depth, and slow-burn tension with visual flair.

🎵 Score: Nicholas Britell

  • Why: His work on Moonlight and Succession blends urban melancholy with intensity—perfect for a modern NYC noir tone.
 

Black Irish

Wise Guy
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
602
"The Pope of Greenwich Village" is one of the big Hollywood what-ifs. DeNiro and Pacino were originally supposed to play the 2 lead characters.
 

Huntr

24 Karat Shamrock
Messages
7,503
Reaction score
10,426
Do not go see 28 Years Later

Zombie movies aren't even my jam, but it's my wife's favorite genre, and she is waaaaay more forgiving when it comes to movies than I am - she can usually find some minor good in some of the worst trash on film. She thought this was terrible and was kind of pissed, since she loved the 1st one so much.

There's so much about it that sucked, I don't even want to take the time to discuss it. Fuck.
 

Punky

Well-known member
Messages
520
Reaction score
875
Yeah, that's the 3rd in the series. The first was 28 Days Later, then 28 Weeks Later, now 28 Years Later. I think they've kinda wrung everything they can out of the concept.
 

Huntr

24 Karat Shamrock
Messages
7,503
Reaction score
10,426
Yeah, that's the 3rd in the series. The first was 28 Days Later, then 28 Weeks Later, now 28 Years Later. I think they've kinda wrung everything they can out of the concept.

I think they have 2 more planned, lol
 

IRISHDODGER

Blue Chip Recruit
Messages
8,044
Reaction score
6,110
I used ChatGPT to recast my favorite film.

This cast is awesome. I'd see this movie:

Recasting The Pope of Greenwich Village (1984) for 2025 is an exciting creative exercise, especially given the film’s strong character dynamics, gritty New York vibe, and blend of crime and drama. Here's a modern take, considering current actors who could embody the same charisma, volatility, and emotional depth.


🎬 The Pope of Greenwich Village (2025 Recast)

Original Role: Charlie Moran (played by Mickey Rourke)

  • 2025 Recast: Timothée Chalamet
    • Why: Chalamet can capture Charlie’s charm, ambition, and slow unraveling under pressure. His recent performances show he can blend cocky swagger with real emotional vulnerability.

Original Role: Paulie (played by Eric Roberts)

  • 2025 Recast: Jeremy Allen White
    • Why: Known for The Bear, White can bring raw, chaotic energy to the role of Paulie—a lovable screw-up with delusions of grandeur. He has that unpredictable, nervous intensity Eric Roberts nailed.

Original Role: Diane (played by Daryl Hannah)

  • 2025 Recast: Sydney Sweeney
    • Why: She brings a grounded but sensual presence, and can play a complex, emotionally invested woman stuck in a tough relationship. She’d update Diane with modern grit.

Original Role: Bed Bug Eddie (played by Burt Young)

  • 2025 Recast: Bobby Cannavale
    • Why: Cannavale has the presence and menace to play a neighborhood mobster who’s dangerous without being cartoonish. He'd be scary but still feel “local.”

Original Role: Barney (played by Kenneth McMillan)

  • 2025 Recast: Brendan Gleeson
    • Why: Gleeson would crush the role of the old-school safecracker with wisdom and world-weariness, bringing a tragic dignity to the part.

🎥 Director: David Michôd

  • Why: Known for Animal Kingdom and The King, he has a knack for crime, character depth, and slow-burn tension with visual flair.

🎵 Score: Nicholas Britell

  • Why: His work on Moonlight and Succession blends urban melancholy with intensity—perfect for a modern NYC noir tone.
“They cut my fuckin’ thumb Charlie!”
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,245
Reaction score
2,508
Do not go see 28 Years Later

Zombie movies aren't even my jam, but it's my wife's favorite genre, and she is waaaaay more forgiving when it comes to movies than I am - she can usually find some minor good in some of the worst trash on film. She thought this was terrible and was kind of pissed, since she loved the 1st one so much.

There's so much about it that sucked, I don't even want to take the time to discuss it. Fuck.
Disappointing……I haven't seen it but was hoping it would be on par with days and weeks.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,071
Yeah, that's the 3rd in the series. The first was 28 Days Later, then 28 Weeks Later, now 28 Years Later. I think they've kinda wrung everything they can out of the concept.
28 decades later?
 

Some Irish Bloke

Five foot nothin', a hundred and nothin'
Messages
6,346
Reaction score
5,922
Do not go see 28 Years Later

Zombie movies aren't even my jam, but it's my wife's favorite genre, and she is waaaaay more forgiving when it comes to movies than I am - she can usually find some minor good in some of the worst trash on film. She thought this was terrible and was kind of pissed, since she loved the 1st one so much.

There's so much about it that sucked, I don't even want to take the time to discuss it. Fuck.
Shit, I'm disappointed to hear that. I was excited to see it, and my wife and I watched the two prequels this weekend in preparation. Huge bummer, but appreciate the heads up.

ETA: 89% on Rotten tomatoes. Just goes to show you how out of touch the "expert" critics are with the audience they supposedly serve. Comparatively, 72% on google review for audience score.

I'll take the audience score to heart every time over the critics. Idgaf how in-depth you are or what parallels you can draw to make a movie sound or look good; I just want to go to a movie and be entertained/escape from reality for a couple of hours.
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,881
Reaction score
8,464
Remember all those drones flying around the east coast?



Shit, I'm disappointed to hear that. I was excited to see it, and my wife and I watched the two prequels this weekend in preparation. Huge bummer, but appreciate the heads up.

ETA: 89% on Rotten tomatoes. Just goes to show you how out of touch the "expert" critics are with the audience they supposedly serve. Comparatively, 72% on google review for audience score.

I'll take the audience score to heart every time over the critics. Idgaf how in-depth you are or what parallels you can draw to make a movie sound or look good; I just want to go to a movie and be entertained/escape from reality for a couple of hours.
It's getting similar scores as 28 weeks later, I have heard good stuff about it so far
 

irishnd31

Biggest Idiot On This Site
Messages
6,208
Reaction score
8,088
So does that version go by dog years? 196 Years Later?
R.bb14e0aee81ab38e70703abe2335a54a
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,071
Watched Plane with Gerard Butler. Plane has to land on an island occupied by some terrorist who take the passengers as prisoners. I wouldn't put it at the top of my list, but it's watchable.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,485
Reaction score
14,223


Excellent movie. My favorite Spike Lee film.

Just did a rewatch. This movie being 23 years old already is a bit weird.

Seymour Hoffman was a gem.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,071
Finished Heads of State. Best way to describe it is a fun action movie. Not great, but not bad.
 

rikkitikki08

Well-known member
Messages
4,262
Reaction score
3,092
Saw it with my son.
Meh, it was ok.

It felt like Guardians of the Galaxy part 4. Nothing original at all, from the slow-mo arrow fight scene set to 70's music to the fact they changed Groot into a puppy.
I was afraid of that, so basically turning Superman into a marvel movie?
 
Top