- Messages
- 44,583
- Reaction score
- 20,035
Uncensored speech on Twitter? Imagine that.I just saw someone call musk a dumbass (and other things) on Twitter. Imagine that shit
Uncensored speech on Twitter? Imagine that.I just saw someone call musk a dumbass (and other things) on Twitter. Imagine that shit
Uncensored speech on Twitter? Imagine that.
Well, when certain types of people don't like your ideas, politics, views, or thoughts, but can't refute them with facts, this is what they do. They call you dumb, racist, a fascist, and etc. In their minds it's a good substitute for actual thought & reason.Not my point, as I am all for it, my point was imagine calling arguably the most successful, savy business person ever, a dumbass because you disagree with them politically. Disagree with ideas or whatever, buy musk is not dumb
I said it was stupid.True; I have seen examples of both. But in my experience of being involved in homeschool communities for 15 years across multiple states, I'll say that the lazy ones are in a very small minority.
Bluto's broad sweeping statements calling other groups ignorant without realizing the ignorance of broad sweeping statements is ironically hilarious. The ability to observe and interpret the world with nuance is a sign of intelligence; we teach that in homeschool.
Lots of rich and successful people can be dumb asses. Usually resulting from their own hubris once they reach a certain level of success.Not my point, as I am all for it, my point was imagine calling arguably the most successful, savy business person ever, a dumbass because you disagree with them politically. Disagree with ideas or whatever, buy musk is not dumb
Lots of rich and successful people can be dumb asses. Usually resulting from their own hubris once they reach a certain level of success.
I’m thinking three of Musks four current business ventures are in for rough waters. His fourth might be as well when people realize colonizing Mars is not that important in the grand scheme of things.
It is odd seeing Musk go all red pill fanboy when his entire business model to date has been buoyed by government subsidies and or contracts.
Anyhow, everyone thought that weirdo from Stanford with the big hair was some crypto genius. Life comes at you fast.
We shall see.
It is odd seeing Musk go all red pill fanboy when his entire business model to date has been buoyed by government subsidies and or contracts.
Or he’s completely lacking in self awareness. Lots of libertarians seem to lack that quality.People thought it was odd when mRNA and cardiologist and Pfizer executives went red pill and spoke out against the vax. They were mocked and ridiculed in the media but were proven correct.
Musk is red pilling because he sees the corruption and wants to fix it.
It's not odd - it's being open minded enough to challenge your beliefs and proactive enough to intervene where and how you can.
No taxes = all services! Winning!Or he’s completely lacking in self awareness. Lots of libertarians seem to lack that quality.
Yeah, that stupid stunt he pulled putting beds and whatnot at Twitter HQ so the employees could work more “hardcore” 24/7 was interesting. Announces a code violation publicly to half the planet then gets butt hurt when the city decides to enforce said code. Kinda dumb.No taxes = all services! Winning!
No taxes = all services! Winning!
Calling something hyperbole doesn't make you right 🤪Typical baseless hyperbole from Toronto lol
😂
- It would be foolish to believe that I could convince someone who believes in subjective truth that I'm right about an issue.
- My goal isn't to be right. My goal is to have merit-based debates.
Subjective truth makes one right about anything they want. We live in a world where even Webster dictionary literally changes definitions so people can win Facebook arguments. Social constructs being torn, bent and twisted to fit this subjective truth but then in turn they are making their subjective truth “reality” by even changing definitions of words. What’s down is up and up is down because Webster said so to try and keep up with the ideal of subjective truth.
- It would be foolish to believe that I could convince someone who believes in subjective truth that I'm right about an issue.
- My goal isn't to be right. My goal is to have merit-based debates.
To expand on that. There are reasons kids point at things when they are young and ask a million questions. They are trying to understand their world. But in this world of subjective truth what’s the point? A kid points and asks what something is, the subjective truth answer would be “whatever you want it to be”.Subjective truth makes one right about anything they want. We live in a world where even Webster dictionary literally changes definitions so people can win Facebook arguments. Social constructs being torn, bent and twisted to fit this subjective truth but then in turn they are making their subjective truth “reality” by even changing definitions of words. What’s down is up and up is down because Webster said so to try and keep up with the ideal of subjective truth.
"She a-howlin' about the front rent, she'll be lucky to get any back rent
She ain't gonna get none of it"
The business strategy of "we're just not going to pay bills" may not stick the landing with Elon's new found base of fiscally responsible fan boys.
Strong possibility I am wrong, though.
This is not normal. You can't just not pay the premise lease in the acquired company. If someone acquires a company and doesn't have a handle on the books then they literally lit money on fire to have a valuation done + the months of due diligence work.I love how some people like Amanda Terkel try to make a mountain out of a mole hill. I've been at a couple of large corporations that were acquired and they did the same thing. They froze everything temporarily to get a good handle on the books.
In other words, try to avoid your kids being in echo chambers. I know that wasn’t your only point, but it’s one I agree with. Saying that, I haven’t formed a final conclusion on what I think about all home schooling. I’ve seen examples of it working great & examples of it stunting the growth or social skills of the students. Anecdotally of course but the ones that seemed to navigate it successfully were those that home schooled during elementary school age and then transitioned to public high schoolI said it was stupid.
Here’s why I believe homeschooling is stupid.
By design it creates self selecting, insulated group(s) which tend to share the same ideas and belief systems from the jump which in turn tends to lead to circular reasoning and confirmation bias.
Also, and this is probably most important as it relates to overall development, home schooling by design also reduces one’s exposure to and socialization with a diverse cohort of peer groups.
Why is this important? Well, I would argue that being exposed to and becoming friends with a diverse group of peers allows for a deeper level of empathy and understanding when it comes to understanding the issues said groups might be facing and or in attempting to understand their belief systems.
It’s easy to dismiss Christians as nut jobs if you’ve never met and or been friends with someone who is a Christian.
In my particular case I’m glad I grew up and went to public school with a bunch of rednecks who had crazy right wing beliefs and I’m sure they would say the same about their libtard friend.
I’m also glad I went to a couple public colleges where I met and became friends with openly gay people, transgender people, bros from Orange County, other poor redneck dummies like me, people from some really rough inner city neighborhoods, kids with wealthy parents, people who were agnostic, Muslims, Christians, Jews and on and on.
It’s interesting that some of the same people who complain about how “divided we are” tend to not recognize this important role that public education plays in society.
Anyhow, home school away.
”if the he/him inserts a butt plug, the he/him won’t be in danger of becoming impregnated by the other he/him…or something”I'm not sure what butt plugs and dildos have to do with sexual education. I dont think that's just a gay thing either. I would be equally disturbed with a speaker or teacher handing out flashlights to teenage boys at school.
Seriously? They can't just not pay? lolThis is not normal. You can't just not pay the premise lease in the acquired company. If someone acquires a company and doesn't have a handle on the books then they literally lit money on fire to have a valuation done + the months of due diligence work.
Maybe the leases were ending soon at the company's you were at and they were reassessing that space but you can't just not pay someone.
Sure but we can't deny how horrible of a look it is to not even pay your rent on time. For a guy in need of good press you can't do things like this. I mean he got booed at Chappelle show lmao.Seriously? They can't just not pay? lol
I have a feeling things will get paid.
It's a nothing burger. Why does he need good press? He's been under criticism way before the Twitter purchase. All the "wokies" still haven't come to grips that Twitter has an owner that believes in freedom of speech and they'll keep trying however they can to make him look bad.Sure but we can't deny how horrible of a look it is to not even pay your rent on time. For a guy in need of good press you can't do things like this. I mean he got booed at Chappelle show lmao.
If he isn't paying rent for the HQ that seems like a something burger. Because he went to a Dave Chappelle show and still was booed lol. I feel like outside of CPAC or a Tim Pool show he's a pariah.It's a nothing burger. Why does he need good press? He's been under criticism way before the Twitter purchase. All the "wokies" still haven't come to grips that Twitter has an owner that believes in freedom of speech and they'll keep trying however they can to make him look bad.
If he isn't paying rent for the HQ that seems like a something burger. Because he went to a Dave Chappelle show and still was booed lol. I feel like outside of CPAC or a Tim Pool show he's a pariah.
Yeah this screams freedom of speech. The guy has a fragile ego, he can do whatever he wants since he owns the place but the claims of him being this free speech liberator is hilarious. It would be better if people just said "I like how he's taking it to the Libs" instead of this faux free speech angle because there's so many examples of him not following that absolutist position some think they have.
Public flight data l o l