The Official Irishenvy Fire Tommy Rees Thread

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
Why do you think we're not adding a portal WR? That seems like a given.
Because the above stated Administration makes it harder than it should be. Other schools don't hae to deal with the bullshit ND makes them go through.
 

Irish4life

Well-known member
Messages
2,887
Reaction score
3,674
Because the above stated Administration makes it harder than it should be. Other schools don't hae to deal with the bullshit ND makes them go through.
Well, we added the #1 transfer portal safety on the market this past offseason. We've added at least 1 dude from the portal for the past 3 years. I really have no clue why it's impossible that ND does it again this offseason, beyond message board doom posting.
 

1rishftw

It's always bulking season
Messages
178
Reaction score
104
The problem is that — unless they land a transfer QB or Angeli comes out of nowhere to be the real deal — there are no short term answers on offense. At least not in this scheme. Maybe you could run a different scheme with Buchner and be successful.

Then even if you get a good QB, you have to deal with the fact that you have maybe one total functional WR on offense in Merriweather. So unless you are adding someone in the transfer portal (spoiler alert: you aren’t) where is the upside for the offense next year?
I'm not sure why everyone is so sure merriweather is the next big thing. just because his one career collegiate catch was a 40 yarder doesnt make him a sure star or even a starter.
 

BeatSC

Well-known member
Messages
4,443
Reaction score
1,375
But yet played in 2 playoffs and 1 national championship. Everyone knows what "Bush Push" is across the country, but ND hasn't been relevant since 88', ok bud. Maybe you should check the definition of relevant because you obviously don't know what it means.
At a minimum we were relevant in 93 when the NC should have been awarded to us not FSU.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,270
Reaction score
2,493
Can someone explain this to me? (why Lenzy and Styles are staring at the sidelines during the play)....(but also how to embed a tweet the correct way)


 
Last edited by a moderator:

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
Well, we added the #1 transfer portal safety on the market this past offseason. We've added at least 1 dude from the portal for the past 3 years. I really have no clue why it's impossible that ND does it again this offseason, beyond message board doom posting.
USC added 26 this year
Bama and other Big Time Schools bring in 5-8 a year.
So yeah... About that administration
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
USC added 26 this year
Bama and other Big Time Schools bring in 5-8 a year.
So yeah... About that administration
Im not sure why everyone is surprised by this? Over the years othe schools have, in addition to their cash dispersants to recruits and families, have employed all kinds of roster management techniques that ND simply cant or wont do. The Portal is no different. We dont grey shirt, take JuCo transfers or even many grad transfers. Expecting ND to take 5 or so portal transfers is asking for disappointment.
 

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
Im not sure why everyone is surprised by this? Over the years othe schools have, in addition to their cash dispersants to recruits and families, have employed all kinds of roster management techniques that ND simply cant or wont do. The Portal is no different. We dont grey shirt, take JuCo transfers or even many grad transfers. Expecting ND to take 5 or so portal transfers is asking for disappointment.
I'm not asking them to. I know they won't, therefore I'm disappointed. People ask why we don't compete with the elite teams in games and for National Championships. The answer is the University of Notre Dame itself.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
I actually think ND will start getting more lenient with transfers because they won't have a choice. If 10+ kids transfer out every year, you have to fill the spots. You can't enter a season with like 70 kids on scholarship. That would immediately drop the facade that ND cares about football and it would be obvious. I would think that would cause the donation basket to get significantly lighter.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
Funny. Nobody was complaining about transfers when we were winning 10+ games a year
The one time transfer rule is like a year old. This is a different world. If ND was losing its backup QB (which usually ended up being the starting QB at some point), a couple skill players, and a ton of depth pieces every year, those 10 win seasons would have been 7-8.

Also it is a zero sum game. The opponents are all taking advantage of it. If ND is not, it is a huge handicap.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
I actually think ND will start getting more lenient with transfers because they won't have a choice. If 10+ kids transfer out every year, you have to fill the spots. You can't enter a season with like 70 kids on scholarship. That would immediately drop the facade that ND cares about football and it would be obvious. I would think that would cause the donation basket to get significantly lighter.
OTOH, when our football graduation rate dips from the ~95 percent rate it has long been to 70 percent b/c we’re taking a bunch of transfers who don’t have transferable credits to graduate on time, I think that may also cause the donation basket to lighten.

It’s a tricky balance. I agree our stance toward undergrad transfers is a big competitive disadvantage. And maybe we do need to let go of the idea that we expect football players to graduate. But there’s also a growing sense across college football that the current wide-open transfer system is insanity and maybe something changes soon and we can ride it out a few years. I dunno.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
OTOH, when our football graduation rate dips from the ~95 percent rate it has long been to 70 percent b/c we’re taking a bunch of transfers who don’t have transferable credits to graduate on time, I think that may also cause the donation basket to lighten.

It’s a tricky balance. I agree our stance toward undergrad transfers is a big competitive disadvantage. And maybe we do need to let go of the idea that we expect football players to graduate. But there’s also a growing sense across college football that the current wide-open transfer system is insanity and maybe something changes soon and we can ride it out a few years. I dunno.
If I remember correctly, there have been talks about walking back the transfer rule. It made a lot more sense pre-NIL. But now it is full-fledged wild west free agency and I don't think anyone really likes that.
 

ndfanatic78

I have unconditional love for every one of you.
Messages
1,561
Reaction score
1,785
Funny. Nobody was complaining about transfers when we were winning 10+ games a year
Yes they were. Maybe you missed it but people have been complaining about jucos and transfers since I’ve been watching ND football going back to the 80’s.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,115
Reaction score
27,371
USC added 26 this year
Bama and other Big Time Schools bring in 5-8 a year.
So yeah... About that administration

and how many left?

Once again we didn’t lose a single key contributor to the portal this off season. Even with a coaching change of almost the entire staff. So who you kicking off each year to account for a roster that does not turnover at the rate others do either?
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
Funny. Nobody was complaining about transfers when we were winning 10+ games a year
Some people were. I said at the time that it was absurd and would lead to consolidation of talent at football factories with lax rules willing to buy transfers.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
and how many left?

Once again we didn’t lose a single key contributor to the portal this off season. Even with a coaching change of almost the entire staff. So who you kicking off each year to account for a roster that does not turnover at the rate others do either?
It didn't turn over like that last year, but there will be years when it does. Ideally, ND will already have procedures in place to fill the empty roster spots so they don't have guys playing two ways like it's 1942.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
If I remember correctly, there have been talks about walking back the transfer rule. It made a lot more sense pre-NIL. But now it is full-fledged wild west free agency and I don't think anyone really likes that.
Yep. And the big spenders can just buy the best players from the mid-majors.
If I were a Pitt fan, for instance, I’d be pissed as hell about the Addison situation. I know the NCAA isn’t really a democracy but I don’t know how the majority of football programs put up with this.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,115
Reaction score
27,371
OSU added a safety and a backup RB/LB.

PSU added a DE, WR and a backup OL (from Cornell)

Michigan added a center (from Virginia), backup DT (we looked at and chose Smith), and DE.

Where are all these enviable B1G schools adding 6 - 8 guys? Michigan St and Indiana?
 

Irish4life

Well-known member
Messages
2,887
Reaction score
3,674
Sure but adding 2 portal WRs makes Buchner's (and Pyne's) lives a heck of a lot easier, and our offense a lot more dynamic. If ND succeeded in landing Charlie Jones and also brought in Matt Landers (another Grad transfer....) and nothing else changed, I'd put good money on ND being 5-1 right now.
 
Top