Brian Kelly to LSU, per report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
3,266
He didnt win 10 games against this schedule. Not sayin he would have lost to Marshal or Stanford but I do not believe he would have won 10 regular season games either this is by far the toughest schedule ND has had in a decade.
Maybe not but like I said, he'd have ND in a position to win ten games right now. Of course it's impossible to know where this team would be with kelly as the HC but I think most would agree that we'd be a one loss team right now and I wouldn't be shocked if he was able to upset Clemson at home (he did it a couple years ago) or that he would beat USC (8-3 overall record against them and won five straight) to end the season 10-2.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Maybe not but like I said, he'd have ND in a position to win ten games right now. Of course it's impossible to know where this team would be with kelly as the HC but I think most would agree that we'd be a one loss team right now and I wouldn't be shocked if he was able to upset Clemson at home (he did it a couple years ago) or that he would beat USC (8-3 overall record against them and won five straight) to end the season 10-2.
10-2 with another NY6 bowl loss feels right.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Yep. He would've been aware enough to grab JT Daniels from the portal and we'd be 5-1 right now.
Maybe? Coan in 2021 was the first year he took a transfer QB, so there's no guarantee he sweet talks Daniels into transferring.

Curious how many would rather keep Kelly at the helm indefinitely for more 10-2 seasons and no chance of ever winning a playoff game.
 

Sea Turtle

Slow and steady wins the race
Messages
5,645
Reaction score
3,488
Maybe? Coan in 2021 was the first year he took a transfer QB, so there's no guarantee he sweet talks Daniels into transferring.

Curious how many would rather keep Kelly at the helm indefinitely for more 10-2 seasons and no chance of ever winning a playoff game.

That's a good question for some but not for me. I was fine with him leaving and I get why he did. I just think that a coaching change is a unique chance to hire a guy that is a difference maker from another team. And it always works out for everyone but us.

USC gets Riley
Alabama gets Saban
Ohio State gets Meyer
Michigan gets Harbaugh
LSU gets our coach(I don't care but they really wanted him)
UCLA gets Chip Kelly
Someone is going to get Rhule

We hire a one year DC at Notre Dame. Maybe he works out. I hope do. But for the love of Pete can we for once go out and land a big fish. I mean, it's Notre Dame, not Vanderbilt, right? Can't they land ONE big fish for a change. And he shouldn't have to be spotless. Holtz sure wasn't.
 

ThePiombino

The OG "TP"
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
6,245
Maybe? Coan in 2021 was the first year he took a transfer QB, so there's no guarantee he sweet talks Daniels into transferring.

Curious how many would rather keep Kelly at the helm indefinitely for more 10-2 seasons and no chance of ever winning a playoff game.
Not I. The MF experiment, if handled correctly by the admin, is a low risk/high reward one. Odds are recruiting will be better than how BK left it. If MF hits, it will get even better. If he doesn't, cupboard is fuller than how BK found it and left it for whichever bonafide HC comes next. No brainer move IMO...

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
That's a good question for some but not for me. I was fine with him leaving and I get why he did. I just think that a coaching change is a unique chance to hire a guy that is a difference maker from another team. And it always works out for everyone but us.

USC gets Riley
Alabama gets Saban
Ohio State gets Meyer
Michigan gets Harbaugh
LSU gets our coach(I don't care but they really wanted him)
UCLA gets Chip Kelly
Someone is going to get Rhule

We hire a one year DC at Notre Dame. Maybe he works out. I hope do. But for the love of Pete can we for once go out and land a big fish. I mean, it's Notre Dame, not Vanderbilt, right? Can't they land ONE big fish for a change. And he shouldn't have to be spotless. Holtz sure wasn't.
Imagine Ruhle not going to the Panthers, staying at Baylor, then taking the ND job when BK left. I'd be all for that one.
 

pumpdog20

Well-known member
Messages
4,743
Reaction score
3,155
Maybe not but like I said, he'd have ND in a position to win ten games right now. Of course it's impossible to know where this team would be with kelly as the HC but I think most would agree that we'd be a one loss team right now and I wouldn't be shocked if he was able to upset Clemson at home (he did it a couple years ago) or that he would beat USC (8-3 overall record against them and won five straight) to end the season 10-2.
I just don't see it with this roster. 2020 had Book, Williams, Joe Moore worthy OLine, Hamilton, JOK on that team.

2022 best player is a TE (yes, the best in the country), but has no help which requires him to make tough catches while being double/triple covered.

BK was not going to go 10-2 with this roster IMO.
 

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
That's a good question for some but not for me. I was fine with him leaving and I get why he did. I just think that a coaching change is a unique chance to hire a guy that is a difference maker from another team. And it always works out for everyone but us.

USC gets Riley
Alabama gets Saban
Ohio State gets Meyer
Michigan gets Harbaugh
LSU gets our coach(I don't care but they really wanted him)
UCLA gets Chip Kelly
Someone is going to get Rhule

We hire a one year DC at Notre Dame. Maybe he works out. I hope do. But for the love of Pete can we for once go out and land a big fish. I mean, it's Notre Dame, not Vanderbilt, right? Can't they land ONE big fish for a change. And he shouldn't have to be spotless. Holtz sure wasn't.
Weird post.
Riley is basically Brian Kelly all over again, just flashier. 10-2 ceiling, teams always have holes and gets outcoached in big games.

Harbaugh lost 3 or more games every year at UM prior to last year, including an 8-5 record in year 3 and going a combined 11-8 in Years 5 and 6.

Chip Kelly was 10-21 his first 3 years at UCLA before putting together his first winning season last year at 8-4. All while the PAC-12 has been the weakest its been in years with Stanford and USC sucking and Oregon being ehhh.

Where do you even come up with this crap.

Funny thing is if we hadnt hired Freeman, when he is superstar HC in 3-4 years everybody would be bitching we let him go, and would probably say its because the school doesnt invest in football and wouldnt pay him. Its a circular conversation with a lot of people on this board just hopping from one thing to the next making bogus points just to have something to complain about and say how everybody else does it better.
 
Last edited:

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
Imagine Ruhle not going to the Panthers, staying at Baylor, then taking the ND job when BK left. I'd be all for that one.
IMO Rhule is a bit overrated. Yes he turned temple into a competitive team by Temple standards which is noteworthy, but overall his run at Baylor and in Carolina were not all that impressive. He put together a decent record his last season at Baylor, but lost to anybody with a pulse. He is a guy that will bring stability to a program and make them competitive, but hes not a championship level coach, or recruiter.
 

IrishBoognish

Well-known member
Messages
2,345
Reaction score
3,628
Freeman was and is a superstar hire.

It's like some of yall rarely watch football and have no idea what happens a lot of the time when a program goes through a massive regime change. It hurts for a second.

Special teams have been very good. Defense, while we all want more havoc, has done their job... every single game. Offense has just been absolute trash.


Adding to that. Particular positions in the offense have been very good too. OLine struggled at first buy they're more than good enough. Young RBs have looked like studs, and I would submit Chanci is doing everything he can with hardly anything in the WR room with a 3 star QB.

What's missing??? We all know.


Offensive playcalling. It's bad. Terrible. Terribad.

Not being able to put up 16.5 points on fucking Stanford is a fireable offense.


Let's not overthink it.
 

chisea03

Active member
Messages
368
Reaction score
157
Weird post.
Riley is basically Brian Kelly all over again, just flashier. 10-2 ceiling, teams always have holes and gets outcoaches in big games.

Harbaugh lost 3 or more games every year at UM prior to last year, including an 8-5 record in year 3 and going a combined 11-8 i. Years 5 and 6.

Chip Kelly was 10-21 his first 3 years at UCLA before putting together his first winning season last year at 8-4. All while the PAC has been the weakest its been in years with Stanford and USC sucking and Oregon being ehhh.

Where do you even come up with this crap.

Funny thing is if we hadnt hired Freeman, when he is superstar HC in 3-4 years everybody would be bitching we let him go, and would probably say its because the school doesnt invest in football and wouldnt pay him. Its a circular conversation with a lot of people on this board just hopping from one thing to the next making bogus points just to have something to complain about and say how everybody else does it better.
All true and great points but the saddest part is from the people who did not and do not want Coach Freeman as the Head Coach for non-football related reasons… and openly pen these thoughts to various forums.
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
IMO Rhule is a bit overrated. Yes he turned temple into a competitive team by Temple standards which is noteworthy, but overall his run at Baylor and in Carolina were not all that impressive. He put together a decent record his last season at Baylor, but lost to anybody with a pulse. He is a guy that will bring stability to a program and make them competitive, but hes not a championship level coach, or recruiter.
We can agree to disagree on this one. When you make Temple viable and get to the big 12 title game at Baylor, you're legit.
 

Irishdrunk

Not Banned Yet
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
807
Maybe? Coan in 2021 was the first year he took a transfer QB, so there's no guarantee he sweet talks Daniels into transferring.

Curious how many would rather keep Kelly at the helm indefinitely for more 10-2 seasons and no chance of ever winning a playoff game.
If you can't get to a NY6 Bowl then what do you do? We are not ranked despite starting out 5th in the nation. Muy Malo.
 

Irishdrunk

Not Banned Yet
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
807
Not I. The MF experiment, if handled correctly by the admin, is a low risk/high reward one. Odds are recruiting will be better than how BK left it. If MF hits, it will get even better. If he doesn't, cupboard is fuller than how BK found it and left it for whichever bonafide HC comes next. No brainer move IMO...

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
How is hiring a DC with no experience as a HC a low risk endeavor? You have Fickel that is a proven HC.

And of course the Admin didn't handle it correctly because they meddled in the hiring process by keeping their boy Rees in place and thereby assured failure by having Marcus paired with an inexperienced OC, too. The hubris is amazing. Frankly the hubris by Jack and ND was clearly fueled by BK's success in turning the ND program around.
 

phillyirish

................
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
884
Matt Rhule did a great job at Temple, but it was Al Golden who took that program from biggest joke in CFB to a respectable mid-major. In between him and Rhule, Steve Addazio also found success and used it to leapfrog to a Power 5 team. Again Rhule was great there, but both at Temple and Baylor he had predecessors who first took the programs and made them respectable.
 

IHateMarkMay

IHateDavidPollackToo
Messages
3,902
Reaction score
1,020
How is hiring a DC with no experience as a HC a low risk endeavor? You have Fickel that is a proven HC.

And of course the Admin didn't handle it correctly because they meddled in the hiring process by keeping their boy Rees in place and thereby assured failure by having Marcus paired with an inexperienced OC, too. The hubris is amazing. Frankly the hubris by Jack and ND was clearly fueled by BK's success in turning the ND program around.
Had Fickel not been in the playoff, I bet he would have gotten an interview at least. Had we waited around until after the playoff, it probably would have negatively impacted recruiting and, had Fickel not wanted the job after the interview, sent a clear message to everyone that Freeman wasn't the first choice.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
Had Fickel not been in the playoff, I bet he would have gotten an interview at least. Had we waited around until after the playoff, it probably would have negatively impacted recruiting and, had Fickel not wanted the job after the interview, sent a clear message to everyone that Freeman wasn't the first choice.
Yes, it was a timing thing. Basically Fickell was off the board for any school not willing to wait until after the playoffs.
 

Irishdrunk

Not Banned Yet
Messages
2,861
Reaction score
807
Had Fickel not been in the playoff, I bet he would have gotten an interview at least. Had we waited around until after the playoff, it probably would have negatively impacted recruiting and, had Fickel not wanted the job after the interview, sent a clear message to everyone that Freeman wasn't the first choice.
Isn't it COMICAL in retrospect? We don't want to wait on interviewing a HC that is so successful that he takes his Non-P5 team to the Playoffs to hire an untested DC and retain a young bull OC. Because no way would Fickell been okay with an OC being put on him. Like the equivalent of a Jet Sweep with your slowest WR on the goal line

What a giant shit show Swarbrick engineered.
 

IHateMarkMay

IHateDavidPollackToo
Messages
3,902
Reaction score
1,020
Isn't it COMICAL in retrospect? We don't want to wait on interviewing a HC that is so successful that he takes his Non-P5 team to the Playoffs to hire an untested DC and retain a young bull OC. Because no way would Fickell been okay with an OC being put on him. Like the equivalent of a Jet Sweep with your slowest WR on the goal line

What a giant shit show Swarbrick engineered.
You are also assuming Fickel would have taken the job. Had he 100% (not Dante Moore's 100%, but actually 100%) for sure would have taken it, current hindsight shows it might have been a good hire. However, if we wait, and wait, and interview, and he turns us down. Man what a shit storm that would've caused.
 

NDMatt91

Well-known member
Messages
3,533
Reaction score
3,453
It's weird to see people pining for Kelly. This team's biggest problems are roster based and he was the primary architect of our current WR and QB issues.
I'm thankful for what he was able to do with the program after the Weis years, but I still prefer Freeman. I still want to roll the dice on having a relentless recruiter call the shots. No doubt, he has been screwed over by the QB room that Rees and Kelly put together and the WR room that Del put together. Marcus needs the chance to hire his own OC so they can attract a quality grad transfer and improve the abomination that is Rees' QB room.

If Marcus turns out to be a slightly above average HC but brings in better classes than Kelly then I'm fine with that because theoretically, his rosters will have more NFL talent than Kelly's.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,120
Reaction score
27,376
Everyone hated 11 - 1/12 - 0 and getting whipped in the CFP until it was gone, and now we want the previous HC who did it or the outside HC who accomplished the same thing.
 

IRISHMAN

Well-known member
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
176
Yep. He would've been aware enough to grab JT Daniels from the portal and we'd be 5-1 right now.
yeah, there was a reason BK brought in jack coan last year rather than going with drew pyne who he recruited. dont know if he would have landed jt daniels or someone else but he would have been smart enough to see the writing on the wall with his current qb depth chart. ND probably would have finished this season 9-3 with a NY6 bowl game apperence.
 

MacIrish75

The New Logo is a Jinx
Messages
9,198
Reaction score
17,760
I feel like this is the sort of weird shit you see with a first time HC. The defense has generally been fine bc Golden is a seasoned coordinator and Freeman is a defensive guy.

The problem is, Tommy has total reign on offense and mfMF doesn’t have the gravitas or experience on that side to do a whole lot. I’d feel a lot better if Mike Denbrock was our OC right now than Tommy. Freeman really needs a veteran guy who can develop talent to run his offense while he figures out how to be a HC.

I didn’t have us losing to Marshall or Stanford, but I had us at 9-3 at best this year with some solid wins (BYU was one) and at least one confounding loss. We’ll see how much growth MF has achieved if he has the ability to move on from Tom Rees. That will be the biggest testament to his growth.
 

BoredIrish

Well-known member
Messages
2,151
Reaction score
1,821
There was always going to be growing pains with a 1st time HC... losing to Marshal and Stanford = Pain.
Now the challenge is to see if Freeman actually grows.
BK lost some bad games in his 1st year but grew from there to a 10 win coach. BK's 1st Coordinators were Diaco and Charlie Molnar.
Let's hope MF can grow into a 14 win coach... only time will tell. If he does, chances are it wont be with Rees and Golden.
 

IRISHMAN

Well-known member
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
176
Everyone hated 11 - 1/12 - 0 and getting whipped in the CFP until it was gone, and now we want the previous HC who did it or the outside HC who accomplished the same thing.
no kidding. a lot of fans complained and wanted BK gone cause 10-2 or 11-1 wasnt good enough. well they got what they wished for BK gone and MF as the new coach hope there enjoying how it worked out.
 

IRISHMAN

Well-known member
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
176
There was always going to be growing pains with a 1st time HC... losing to Marshal and Stanford = Pain.
Now the challenge is to see if Freeman actually grows.
BK lost some bad games in his 1st year but grew from there to a 10 win coach. BK's 1st Coordinators were Diaco and Charlie Molnar.
Let's hope MF can grow into a 14 win coach... only time will tell. If he does, chances are it wont be with Rees and Golden.
yeah some of those early losses BK had were frustrating (USF, Tulsa, UM, MSU).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top