- Messages
- 27,769
- Reaction score
- 10,145
While in Chicago for my sisters wedding, we had a few hungover mornings, and rewatched quite a bit of last season in anticipation of the upcoming season. Extremely excited for this.
T-minus 67 minutes.
Huh? The new season doesn't start till Sunday.
Son of a bitch... My dvr had it on for tonight and I am an idiot. Back to my misery, nothing to see here folks...
Son of a bitch... My dvr had it on for tonight and I am an idiot. Back to my misery, nothing to see here folks...
GRRM would be proud of this misery
To some readers, the ideal screen adaptation is essentially a video illustration of the book: the thing that was in our heads, projected for us on a screen. Think of how some “Harry Potter” fans practically watched the movies with a checklist, praising them for how much of the source material they retained.
But book-based series succeed best when they choose to — or have to — declare independence. HBO’s “The Leftovers” became one of TV’s best shows in Season 2, when it exhausted the Tom Perrotta book. Syfy’s “The Magicians” took a scissors to the narrative of Lev Grossman’s fantasy novels, becoming nimble and funny in a screen-friendly way. Starz’s “Outlander” took liberties with Diana Gabaldon’s narrative but kept its spirit.
For all its stunning set pieces — the battles of the Blackwater and Hardhome, the duel between Oberyn Martell and Gregor (the Mountain) Clegane — “Thrones” at heart is a series of conversations. Varys and Littlefinger. Jaime and Brienne. Tywin and Arya. Cersei and Lady Olenna. Tyrion and … well, anyone. In the Season 5 finale, the swordsman Daario, assessing Tyrion’s suitability for a search party, sums up his abilities: “So mainly you talk.” It’s true — and it’s why Tyrion, a disinherited dwarf, is the series’ most dangerous character.
Mr. Martin’s anvil-size books are more expansive. They include vast downloads of Westeros history and religion, outlines of genealogy and toothsome descriptions of banquets, which are vivid on the page — and should stay there. “Thrones” has lost some of the books’ majesty, but it has given them a much-needed edit, a Valyrian sword hacking through the expository clutter.
It’s been a good marriage, but it’s past time for a separation. “Thrones” slowed to a jog in Season 5, and story lines like Jaime and Bronn’s road trip to Dorne were advertisements for the fast-forward button. Even if the rest of the series follows Mr. Martin’s plans (the showrunners David Benioff and D. B. Weiss have worked in consultation with him), it may be better off for being TV first, without the anxiety of a best seller’s influence.
Which version will be authentic? Each will be authentically itself. Sometimes a story doesn’t have a single, definitive narrative. Artworks evolve, be they the variants of Shakespeare’s plays, Kanye West’s revisions to “The Life of Pablo” or George Lucas’s edits to “Star Wars.” We grasp at canonicity — Han shot first! — to deal with uncertainty. But while we can argue which version is better, no one, not even Mr. Martin, can end the argument. “A Song of Ice and Fire” is not the novelization of “Thrones,” and now “Thrones” can be more than the serialization of the novels.
I’ll watch the new “Game of Thrones” as soon as it airs (HBO is not sharing it in advance with critics). I’ll read Mr. Martin’s final books whenever they come. It doesn’t matter which gets there first, because there is no single “there.” They share the same world, but they’re two different continents, separated by a narrow sea.
It’s been a good marriage, but it’s past time for a separation. “Thrones” slowed to a jog in Season 5, and story lines like Jaime and Bronn’s road trip to Dorne were advertisements for the fast-forward button. Even if the rest of the series follows Mr. Martin’s plans (the showrunners David Benioff and D. B. Weiss have worked in consultation with him), it may be better off for being TV first, without the anxiety of a best seller’s influence.
How are they blaming Martin for a shitty sub plot that was never in the books. Not only was the plot boring and lead nowhere, the casting and acting was also terrible. The shows first steps out of the nest flopped, but now we should be clamoring for them to diverge further?
How are they blaming Martin for a shitty sub plot that was never in the books. Not only was the plot boring and lead nowhere, the casting and acting was also terrible. The shows first steps out of the nest flopped, but now we should be clamoring for them to diverge further?
Is anyone not going to watch tonight? I'm going to because I know I'll be spoiled by the Internet anyway.
So... This is like... Really on tonight, right?
I guess I'll give it another try.
No italics?
No. I missed a couple episodes last season (apparently the ones people said were good), but I thought that the others were very boring.
It's definitely HBO that needs to get their shit together. Those first few episodes were utter crap.Get your shit together zelly...
It's definitely HBO that needs to get their shit together. Those first few episodes were utter crap.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk