The scheme creates very few turnovers for being so aggressive. It's almost pointless at times.
Not to sidetrack the thread, but this is probably the biggest frustration of the BVG era for me.
I don't have a problem with BVG or the scheme, as he has been limited in what he can do with various injuries the last two years.
When Drue Tranquill has been on the field, totally different defense on 3rd down. You have someone that can bring pressure, but also cover. I don't know whether to count him as a LB, Nickel/Dime or S when he is on the field in third down, but good things happen haha.
In 2014, Notre Dame was solid when they have Matthias Farley in the nickel. He was able to play the run, but also showed the ability to play in space. The nickel masks some of Farley's weaknesses in terms of ability to go vertical with receivers.
The problem in 2014 was the lack of consistent safety play in my opinion.
That gets me to 2014. Notre Dame moved Farley out of the nickel, because of lack of depth and production at the safety spot. When Tranquill/Crawford got hurt, Notre Dame didn't have a nickel and BVG tried to get cute with Russell there.
When Russell didn't work out, ND went to a form of a base defense and started to drop Day/Okwara/Trumbetti more and more. I don't think it's bc BVG thinks he was smart at dropping DL into coverage, but more a product of not having a nickel, so he tried to guess and catch teams with zone blitzes.
Obviously, Notre Dame has better depth in the secondary after NSD and you can see the type of kid BVG really wants in his system. He wants guys at rush end that can drop, but also have skill in rushing the passer. I would almost say he is recruiting the ever famous "Diaco DOG" position.