I'm not saying that McKinley can't or won't be great - hell, he could turn out to be an NFL Hall of Fame player some day. Anquan Boldin is the main player that comes to mind for me when I'm thinking of a guy with less than ideal measurables that turned out to be a stud. Wes Welker is another. But that said - measurables still matter when identifying elite talent. It's not all there is to the game but speed and size still play a huge role in football. A player that is bigger/stronger/faster than another player will always have a higher ceiling until he proves he can't understand the nuances of his position that keeps him from being great. Sorry for this clusterfvck of a post - my son is crawling all over me.
Not true. Or more specifically, not true enough. Sure intelligence figures into it and physical gifts come first. But there are other qualities, many of which can be summed up by asking, "how good of a football player is he?"
Every coach has seen and talked about it. Kelly made a big point about it this fall saying the guy with the fastest forty may not be able to play ball well, at all.
And the classic player example is Taylor Mays. Faster forty than prey that eludes a cheetah, at least 6'3" and all of 220, yet his most remarkable highlights were his illegal hits, and penalties. Looking at him he should have been all everything forever, at every level. Not so much. Just wasn't a football player.