B
Bogtrotter07
Guest
Two reasons in my estimation:
1. He had a knack for finding the football last year and he made some big plays, i.e., stripped a ball against Michigan, the interception against FSU, etc. I agree with Koon that he wasn't as disruptive as one would want against the run (very few tackles for loss) but he was a solid run defender last year - he got to the ball carrier and was a sure tackler.
2. Expectations. This is the big one, IMO. Most people expected him to struggle last year and he didn't. He played well and everyone was ecstatic about his performance. Expectations were much higher this year and he hasn't met them. The more you give the more people will want. That's life.
Note to a Brilliant football mind, great looking guy with magnificent friends, and a guy with a great name :
Please add to your estimation : All his fellow players realized with his leadership and other intangibles he made them play better than they otherwise would.
My only analogy is having the right NCOIC. If you have a marines' marine, who cares for his men, and really knows the ropes, that really helps during tough times or facing uncertain situations. And remember last year, once the frozen five started playing out, the only thing that was for sure was that the team, particularly the defense, were going to be young!
This is a perfect scenario for a non-playmaker with leadership skills to max the value chart. Remember, when you look at last year in any conversation about Joe, you have to look at Jaylon's productivity post Navy, (Joe's injury.)
Or ask Jaylon. He said last year that even with his play which got recognition nationally, Joe was more important to the defense.
So I see this conversation as follows :
Some are arguing that Joe isn't athletic enough to be a playmaker at this level; they are right.
Others are arguing that Joe's intangibles are worth more than his athletic limitations; they are right.
The only people that are wrong are those that want to lay a lot of the defensive miscues and inadequacies at his feet; the fact is most of them are on the back end of the defense.