Means that he has the most career receiving yards returning into next year, maybe I worded it weird but not something to get all snarky about.
Obviously, in this scenario Sanders will be pushing Hunter to the outside. Which is fine cause Hunter could do fine out there but I just don't think Sanders starts next year, I know he has been exciting in the return game but hasn't even been on the field for a catch. I get it St. Brown is getting raved about, but how often do players get praised during spring traing and such only to never translate to the field. He will be a great receiver but at this point, 1 catch fro 8 yards doesn't indicate he will be our #1 receiver next year.
Correct. Except about Kelly playing him no matter what. I get people think Kelly has that mentality (a la Joe Schmidt). I just think him being our most experienced receiver, combined with the fact that he showed (at least last year) that he can be a product receiver.
Hey Philly, glad you took my post more charitable than it was originally worded. I think despite Robinson's production, he's been fairly unreliable and didn't see many targets on the field.
And I also understand that we often hear praise for a player and some never pan out but it would be dishonest to lump all praise together. Some players Kelly gets really excited about and others he mentions good things when prompted.
He's gone out of his way to say that ESB would be starting at most colleges right now but Fuller is in front of him. Couple that with ESB having a full year+ to learn the offense and I expect him to be a day one starter.
I don't believe CJS would be "bumping Tori out" but instead, Kelly will be looking to get the most dynamic group of players on the field. I believe, given everything we've seen and heard, that would be ESB, CJS and THJr.
Of course, Robinson could right the ship or Boykin/Guyton/Holmes could have monster springs or another freshman could join and tear things up.
All of this is contingent on Fuller leaving for the NFL.
I'm happy it's a conversation we're having, it means we actually have options.
I also imagine we'll lose at least one, maybe two WRs to transfer. No inside knowledge, no visions, just the roster coupled with the staff's intention to take 25 this cycle makes me believe we'll lose at least a few players who've been buried.