I don't really see it as a beauty pageant... we had two ugly wins against crappy teams. Got Ws, but we didn't execute. IMO, we won on pure talent, even though a lot of that talent was sloppy. MichSt had a sexy road win. Iowa is undefeated. OK on the other hand had a sloppy hold-on win vs a team that used to be sexy... I do think we can jump OK with a sexy win at Stanford so long as OK does not pound OKSt.
Doesn't see it as a beauty pageant.
Describes every team as either sexy or ugly.
See, this is more what I expected from the beginning. We have no allies in that room, and we shouldn't expect to get in over a conference champ.
I'm disappointed that I ever believed we'd get a fair shake.
![]()
"Never tell me the odds." -Han Solo
![]()
See, this is more what I expected from the beginning. We have no allies in that room, and we shouldn't expect to get in over a conference champ.
I'm disappointed that I ever believed we'd get a fair shake.
There it is.I didn't realize that we are formally held to a higher standard than other teams in that we have to be "definitively" better than a conference champ to get into the playoff. I'm embarrassed to admit I didn't know that was actually a written rule (I assumed it was merely informal).
That means that we have to be clearly better than two conference champs to get in, which means that we have to be undefeated, which means that we aren't really in a better position than with the BCS. Which means we need an 8 team playoff.
There are no bad wins at this time of the year, but Notre Dame looked nothing like a playoff contender at Fenway Park. The Irish committed five turnovers (three in the red zone) and could have lost if Boston College posed a viable offensive threat. DeShone Kizer needs to be much sharper at Stanford, the best team Notre Dame has faced since Clemson. Remember, Notre Dame has to be definitively better than a conference champion vying for the No. 4 spot.
As someone pointed out on another site, this whole thing is starting to seem suspiciously hyped/controlled by ESPN. The committee rankings pretty much always reflect their power rankings. The committee also uses ESPN's completely-fucking-bogus FPI as one of their tools. Check out their power rankings from this week: NCAA College Football Power Rankings Week 13 - ESPN
Pay special attention to the narrative:
It mirrors the talking points from the hosts today... "out gained by Wake Forest" (despite beating them by more points than virtually anyone)... and the like. This is in direct contrast to what they said last week while slotting us at 4... ESPN goes "They whipped Wake Forest on Saturday, but their perch might not be secure with Oklahoma State and Iowa remaining unbeaten." So like what the hell is going on? It seems really clear someone had a producers meeting and said "OK, Notre Dame is getting moved down two spots... here is the narrative to justify that."
It really wouldn't surprise me if having ND high up in initial rankings was a ploy to drive ratings/buzz for these shoes and there was never any intent to have us over a conference champ.
So what's going to happen if ND beats Stanford? This week it's Stanford is a top ten team that has outside playoff chance and is the favorite to win the Pac 12. With an ND win the narrative will be "well they are a three loss team in a weak Pac 12". ND could win by three scores, no way they get in now without absolute pandemonium.
We just need to pound Stanford and let the chips fall while hoping for some luck...
Right now I'm wishing for.....
Iowa loss to Nebraska
Mich St loss to PSU
OhSU loss to scUM
OK loss to OKSt
Baylor Loss to TCU
Bama loss to Auburn
FL loss to FSU
I think we are going to get a lot of help this week. I'm not sure if it'll be enough, but help is on the way...
I'm really confident in Iowa losing to Nebraska this week. Nebraska is coming off a bye and is probably the best 6-loss team in the country. Plus, it's AT Nebraska. I just have a really good feeling about this one.
I think Florida loses to FSU. This doesn't really help unless Florida can then upset Alabama in the SEC championship.
I like the home teams' chances this week in the other matchups (Michigan, Oklahoma St and TCU).
I don't think PSU beats MSU, but it's possible. And, don't think there is much chance that Auburn beats Alabama, but that's the game that changes things for us more than any other game this week. I'll be rooting hard for the Tigers.
All this crap about "eye test" is going to bring back the days from the 80's where running up scores is all that mattered. Back then, teams like Oklahoma and Nebraska would be favored by 63 pts against Rice and still cover. The committee claims they are watching all these games, but I don't buy it. I think many still relying on media coverage to formulate opinions.
Or MSU losing this week and UofM beating Iowa for the B1G ChampionshipNebraska beating Iowa-> Iowa beating Sparty. No B1G.
Even though my brother in law graduated from Bama, my sister graduated from Auburn. So I will be rooting for the Tigers anyway, just as I have for them since her freshman year there, over 25 years ago.
Bonus points if they win just because it might help the Irish.