UConn has signed up to play BC in '16 and '17. Maybe now Diaco can have a rivalry that actually makes some sense
UConn fans really dislike BC for keeping them out of the ACC. Apparently BC wanted to be "the New England school," which is laughable, as this map shows. UConn is in a small state, but it dominates the state in a way that no school in New England does. This is probably because there are no Big Four pro teams in CT, and the state is otherwise divided between Boston and New York loyalties.
This could become a solid rivalry.
I thought the fact that UConn has had no success outside of basketball, where they are known for breaking the rules, had more to do with it. Further, I'm not sure how well a 2nd-tier land-grant school fits in the ACC anyway. I think only VT fits in that category, and they're both higher-ranked and better at football.
While Syracuse presented no problem, UConn did - to BC, which was still fuming over what it perceived to be vitriolic comments made when BC was finally invited to join the ACC and started competing in 2005. UConn and Pittsburgh filed a lawsuit against BC, and Calhoun made comments about never playing BC again.
[Gene] DeFilippo [BC's AD at the time] does not deny that BC opposed the inclusion of UConn.
“We didn’t want them in,’’ he said. “It was a matter of turf. We wanted to be the New England team.’’
Power move by ACC, Mark Blaudschun, Boston Globe, October 9 2011
The Fightin' Diacos beat Tulane for win #5 and need one more to be bowl eligible. The problem is they only have two remaining games, Houston 11/21 and Temple 11/28.
The Fightin' Diacos beat Tulane for win #5 and need one more to be bowl eligible. The problem is they only have two remaining games, Houston 11/21 and Temple 11/28.
I think it would be hilarious if Temple got upset by the Fighting Diacos, although it's probably not likely unless them come in unprepared or overlook them. UConn really needed to beat USF to get bowl eligible this year, I don't see them picking up a win against Houston or Temple. Next year they may pull it off, and their team is improving, so I don't see them booting Diaco.
I think it would be hilarious if Temple got upset by the Fighting Diacos, although it's probably not likely unless them come in unprepared or overlook them. UConn really needed to beat USF to get bowl eligible this year, I don't see them picking up a win against Houston or Temple. Next year they may pull it off, and their team is improving, so I don't see them booting Diaco.
A win over Houston for the Fighting Diacos...bowl eligible for the first time in awhile. First win over an undefeated ranked team ever.
Was wondering the same thing.He's proven his salt.
I wonder if he will be considered for a bigger program
He's proven his salt.
I wonder if he will be considered for a bigger program

He's proven his salt.
I wonder if he will be considered for a bigger program
UConn second-year football coach Bob Diaco did not deny he was contacted by FBS schools that recently hired new coaches, but he would not say which schools reached out to him.
Just imagine having a Diaco defense this past year. We all complained and groaned but we would likely be undefeated right now (of course that is terribly revisionistic).
Without Daniel Cage?Would almost assuredly be undefeated and in the playoffs.
Just imagine having a Diaco defense this past year. We all complained and groaned but we would likely be undefeated right now (of course that is terribly revisionistic).
Would almost assuredly be undefeated and in the playoffs.
Without Daniel Cage?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Just imagine having a Diaco defense this past year. We all complained and groaned but we would likely be undefeated right now (of course that is terribly revisionistic).