I think Joe Montana was one of the greatest athletes in pro sports ever because he was a WINNER. He won a National Championship at Notre Dame. He played better in the clutch. His teammates had absolute confidence he would get the job done when the game was on the line.
I think Joe Montana, Michael Jordan and Bill Russell are among the greatest pro athletes not because of statistics but because they had a fierce desire to win, they won and they inspired their teams and carried their teams to victory.
If you google "collinsworth montana god" and read you might see what I am getting at.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en data-scribe-reduced-action-queue="><p>Source at Gillette Stadium said QB Tom Brady was first player in building at 7 am today for the start of the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Patriots?src=hash">#Patriots</a> offseason program.</p>— Christopher Price (@cpriceNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/cpriceNFL/status/590156855441289216">April 20, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Gunning for Super Bowl #5 to completely end this argument.
What's the big deal. I'm in at 7 every day.
fvck Meatchicken
What's the big deal. I'm in at 7 every day.
It's amazing to me how little respect Noll and Bradshaw get.
...and if I made Brady's money for playing a game...I'd be bangin' on the glass at 5:30
Bradshaw was a winner no doubt. But he really wasn't that great of a QB. He benefited from a great defense, a strong running game and two very good and acrobatic WRs. He has a career TD-INT ratio of nearly 1:1 which even in his days is not very good by any stretch.
Is Belichick really any better than Noll, Lombardi? Or LA dry and Shula who did it with multiple Qb's?
I get that Belichick is great but he really is the only GREAT coach of his generation and was doing nothing until Brady fell into his lap.
Not a lot of players, QBs even less, are considered elite at both college and NFL. I feel like no one will ever touch Joe in that category, but I think Brady has got him in the NFL.
I don't, at all... he plays a a prefect era/system for stat whore QBs, I seriously doubt he'd have been all that good at all in the 1980s... and he's a skunkbear... fvk him and his tainted ass legacy.![]()
That's fair and I barely remember Montana as a NFL QB. But seriously, who can trump Montana if both CFB and NFL 'greatness' are both equally weighted?
Maybe Greg Bryant when all is said and done.
So Belichick ended the discussion of greatest coach ever but now we've got a serious debate about greatest football player ever.
Montana or Brady: Who do you got?
After his 1968 rookie season with the Pittsburgh Steelers, Bleier was drafted into the U.S. Army in December 1968.[3] He volunteered for duty in the Vietnam War and shipped out in May 1969, serving with the 196th Light Infantry Brigade. On August 20, while on patrol in Heip Duc, Bleier was wounded in the left thigh by a rifle bullet when his platoon was ambushed in a rice paddy. While down, an enemy grenade landed nearby after bouncing off a fellow soldier, sending shrapnel into his lower right leg. He lost part of his right foot in the blast as well.

I'm sure the last part is trolling, but are you serious about the first part? Modern passing stats might be inflated, but that has nothing to do with championships. Opposing quarterbacks also benefit from the modern game, so it's no easier to win even though it might be easier to throw for yardage.I don't, at all... he plays in a prefect era/system for stat whore QBs, I seriously doubt he'd have been all that good at all in the 1980s... and he's a skunkbear... fvk him and his tainted ass legacy.![]()
That's fair and I barely remember Montana as a NFL QB. But seriously, who can trump Montana if both CFB and NFL 'greatness' are both equally weighted?
Maybe Greg Bryant when all is said and done.
I'm sure the last part is trolling, but are you serious about the first part? Modern passing stats might be inflated, but that has nothing to do with championships. Opposing quarterbacks also benefit from the modern game, so it's no easier to win even though it might be easier to throw for yardage.
...except for a quarterback. It's the most individual position in modern team sports.rings factor into an individual players' overall greatness almost not at all in teams sports...
Yes, those are very individual and goalie might be the closest comparable. A pitcher would be, but they only pitch once every five days and even then for about seven innings or so. A pitcher has the ball for 50% of each inning, 78% of each game's innings, 20% of the games. So a good starting pitcher has the ball about 8% of his team's plays. A quarterback has the ball for 50% of his team's plays (every offensive play). Even if you only want to say 50% of those plays are passes, that's still 25% of the game.disagree, pitchers, catchers, goalies all say hi.
Yes, those are very individual and goalie might be the closest comparable. A pitcher would be, but they only pitch once every five days and even then for about seven innings or so. A pitcher has the ball for 50% of each inning, 78% of each game's innings, 20% of the games. So a good starting pitcher has the ball about 8% of his team's plays. A quarterback has the ball for 50% of his team's plays (every offensive play). Even if you only want to say 50% of those plays are passes, that's still 25% of the game.
I don't think that's right. Unless the opponent swept their series and had the opportunity to get their rotation in order and you were coming out of a short-rest situation, playoff series are usually ace versus ace, number two versus number two, etc. Plus, you have a lot of makeup opportunity in a seven-game series. I'd say facing Tom Brady in a single elimination game in January is worth at least 1/7 of a chalked up loss.I don't disagree, however:
No one in the NFL goes into the playoffs and sees a game against a specific QB and just pencils it in as a loss. MLB teams do.