Pa Golden Tate Fan
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,501
- Reaction score
- 162
Well wouldn't everyone seeing how Riggs has 1 year to play and Alexander has 4?
Yes.
Well wouldn't everyone seeing how Riggs has 1 year to play and Alexander has 4?
... Long Term Defiantly Alexander.
Riggs vs. Alexander's a silly argument. We didn't get Alexander. That meant we could take Riggs. It wasn't either/or and we're damn lucky to get him. He can contribute right away instead of maybe down the road. He can help make our younger guys better. And we have another schollie for our small class next year.
Who is it that doesn't like the staff taking Riggs?
I keep seeing that, but I haven't seen anyone not excited about this.
Go far enough back in the thread and you'll see them. People saying "he missed his chance" and other nonsense.
Are you Keith Arnold?
That's silly. This is zero risk, reward TBD.
Exactly, I don't know about the upside, but there's literally no risk involved.
1 year of Riggs. Because he is a proven starter on one of the best secondaries in the country. Alexander is a riskier pick. If he doesn't start, it means that Luke is very talented. Its at worst guaranteed depth for a one year stop gap.
Not to mention he opens up doors for other 5th year transfers for ND and he can hit like this:
![]()
"I am very thankful for this opportunity," said Riggs. "I fully intend to make the most of this opportunity by not only giving my absolute best effort, but also leading by example both on and off the field.
Why italics? That's exactly a #RKG thing to say.
Secondary is stacked
CB: Russell, Butler
CB: Riggs, Luke, Watkins
FS: Redfield/Baratti, Hardy, Fairley
SS: Shumate, Collinsworth