- Messages
- 27,769
- Reaction score
- 10,146
T. Alexander is a very good prospect and he has a good shot at starting from day 1 at Nickel CB. That doesn't mean he'll be playing every snap but he'll be on the field a lot, IMO.
You thought Garnett was though? Or are you referring to McKenzie?
Personally, I'd rather have Cage and Alexander. They can both most certainly contribute to this team.
T. Alexander is a very good prospect and he has a good shot at starting from day 1 at Nickel CB. That doesn't mean he'll be playing every snap but he'll be on the field a lot, IMO.
This year's Cole Luke.
Won't get a ton of snaps, but the one's he will get will be meaningful.
As talented as I believe Nick Watkins is, I don't think he could play inside against slot receivers.
with Brown apparently OUT now, IM OUT and Sawyers OUT...are we essentially down to:
the 3DT's: Cage, Garnett, C Nelson
Alexander
Quick
Juju
and then add a 7th guy: the mystery recruit if it wasnt Brown in the first place?
am i missing anyone?
so with any Nelson without a first name of quenton eliminated, and Garnett to OU...are we now down to:
Cage
Alexander
Quick
Juju
and the obligatory potential "unknown to all but the staff" guy(s)?
Bingo. Except Garnett is still visiting thus still considering ND.
McKenzie had some speed and moves that I think would have helped as a return man.
i thought garnett just committed to ou?
You're wrong Anna Hickey. You're wrong.
Sucks that both Hickey and ISD predict Alexander is going to Stanford. He is my biggest want on the board.
Sucks that both Hickey and ISD predict Alexander is going to Stanford. He is my biggest want on the board.
No way is he a bigger want than Quick.
Sucks that both Hickey and ISD predict Alexander is going to Stanford. He is my biggest want on the board.
No way he's a bigger want for IM8?
He can have an opinion, dude. haha
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Prediction: ND doesn't ink another DB or DT, b/ there's a shot @ WR. Summation of recruiting headed into wkend ($) <a href="http://t.co/CuIs6uiU5J">http://t.co/CuIs6uiU5J</a></p>— Anna Hickey (@AnnaHScout) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnnaHScout/statuses/429258310412296193">January 31, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
No way is he a bigger want than Quick.
She thinks if ND was involved with Alexander earlier there would be no doubt. Garnett's parents are not coming with him and believes Cage has MSU leading still. Quick 50/50
She thinks if ND was involved with Alexander earlier there would be no doubt. Garnett's parents are not coming with him and believes Cage has MSU leading still. Quick 50/50
Cage is still on his visit though, right? I'd think that would make it hard to tell if we've gained ground.
II has up the staff picks 3.0. Its Pete Sampson, Jake Brown, and Steve Hare.
T. Alexander-All think ND
D.Cage- Pete ND, Jake and Steve Mich. St.
C. Garnett- ALL OU
IM- Pete and Jake Ole Miss, Steve VT
Quick- Pete and Jake OU, Steve UCLA
Juju- All USC
According to them it doesn't look good right now for the finish to this class. With that said I'm not sure these are the best guys to be following for recruiting knowledge at this point.
Yeah, they are definitely out of the loop on Quick, which makes me doubt all of their conclusions.
II has up the staff picks 3.0. Its Pete Sampson, Jake Brown, and Steve Hare.
T. Alexander-All think ND
D.Cage- Pete ND, Jake and Steve Mich. St.
C. Garnett- ALL OU
IM- Pete and Jake Ole Miss, Steve VT
Quick- Pete and Jake OU, Steve UCLA
Juju- All USC
According to them it doesn't look good right now for the finish to this class. With that said I'm not sure these are the best guys to be following for recruiting knowledge at this point.