gkIrish
Greek God
- Messages
- 13,184
- Reaction score
- 1,004
1) You're going strictly on revenue? By that logic and your article, USC is outside of the top 10. Seems to contradict your argument, considering you agreed USC is ahead of Alabama, no?
But if you want to use articles, let's see some others than have Alabama outside of the top 5 best coaching jobs (not sure why we're using other people's sources, because we're talking about my opinion here, but hey, you started it and I'll play along:
Georgia - College Football's 20 Best Coaching Jobs - Photos - SI.com
The Sunday List: The 10 best head-coaching jobs in college football | Chris Murray's Blog
10 Most Desirable College Football Coaching Jobs | Bleacher Report
Texas, Ohio State headline 20 best college football coaching jobs - Andy Staples - SI.com
I could go on, but again, this is my opinion so IDK why were using other sources. But these people agree.
2) Almost all of the things you double spaced are true for most SEC teams. And the two that aren't (complete control and well paid assistants) comes with winning, something that is Saban-specific. If Saban leaves, you think they next Bama coach is stepping in at > 5 million per year? If so, pass me what you're smoking.
3) I'm sure it is. But better than Florida, California, hell, even Texas? I don't think you'll say that, but if you do, agree to disagree.
4) This is part of your argument in your more recent post which I didn't quote, but you say Florida is a bad job because they're not winning the past couple of years? Who cares? They're still a big name in the premier conference in a perfect location (although you disagree maybe), and have won titles recently. And I'd argue it's BETTER to take over a program who's last coach has struggled. Yes, taking over a huge program who hasn't won recently is more attractive IMO.
Think about this. Do you want to take over USC after Pete Carrol or Lane Kiffen? Lane Kiffen, all day. This isn't a huge deal, as Florida would be a more attractive job than Alabama IMO whether or not the current coach is winning or losing, but you mentioned their 'shambles' so I wanted to share.
I didn't bother looking at the Bleacher Report article you posted but of the other 3, only one even lists Notre Dame in the top 10 (#9). So either they are accurate and Alabama isn't a top 5 job but it's better than ND or they are inaccurate in general.