WakeUpEchoes
New member
- Messages
- 2,574
- Reaction score
- 101
Can you imagine the outrage if he won the Heisman and a national title... then got charged with rape? My god.
I think the NCAA could still strip it.
Can you imagine the outrage if he won the Heisman and a national title... then got charged with rape? My god.
the other thing i found strange was espn claims he can still be charged but will not be charged at this time. WTF!
the other thing i found strange was espn claims he can still be charged but will not be charged at this time. WTF!
I think the NCAA could still strip it.
I think the NCAA could still strip it.
Not surprised at all they won't charge. I do find it strange the ESPN report states they could not secure an indictment. I thought there was enough to get an indictment, but not a conviction. Meggs has insisted he would not charge unless there was a reasonable likelihood of a conviction, which to me made today a foregone conclusion.
EDIT: The language I found strange has now been removed from the ESPN story. It read something along the lines of "the source said no charges would be filed because Meggs felt he could not secure an indictment."
Pretty sure the NCAA has no power over the Heisman whatsoever...
Couldn't secure an indictment is not an explanation. The Grand Jury in basically every jurisdiction always takes its cue from the DA. If he indicated he wanted to press the case he would have an indictment.
I was in wait and see mode, just like with Trayvon and other national stories... if the DA had any reason to believe his guilt and had any amount of evidence to move forward I believe they would have charged him... innocent until proven guilty... let the kid alone...
Couldn't secure an indictment is not an explanation. The Grand Jury in basically every jurisdiction always takes its cue from the DA. If he indicated he wanted to press the case he would have an indictment.
That's my point. He has been consistently saying two things: 1. he would not go before a grand jury; 2. he would not file charges unless there was a reasonable likelihood of conviction. The original report's language that he did not feel he could secure an indictment made no sense in light of those two things, especially the first. I suspect he will make some sort of statement that implies #2 above.
Oh I see. I didn't know that he had said he wouldn't go before a grand jury. I wonder why not.
The news article was probably just inaccurate, unless it was a direct quote. I feel like most people don't understand the process of bringing charges or the difference between different charging instruments.
meggs press conference was interesting...up to this point i thought winston and this girl knew each other prior to the alleged assault and she claims they did not. she also claims she had consensual sex with her boyfriend that also did not know winston. Now im really conflicted.
I'm not a fan of that argument. "Innocent until proven guilty" applies to the legal system so we're not locking people up unless we can prove their guilt. I don't have to use that standard when I form personal opinions about people. I can apply whatever standard I'd like, whether it's "beyond a reasonable doubt," "a preponderance of the evidence," "yeah, he probably did it," or "I don't like his face, so there." OJ Simpson is a murderer, even if he wasn't "proven guilty" in a court of law. Michael Jackson was a weirdo creep who probably did stuff with little boys, even though I can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
meggs press conference was interesting...up to this point i thought winston and this girl knew each other prior to the alleged assault and she claims they did not. she also claims she had consensual sex with her boyfriend that also did not know winston. Now im really conflicted.
That's my confliction. Not only did she not know him, but she immedietely got a rape kit done.
This public announcement and media circus are despicable. Any victim who encounters a similar situation in the future will be hesitant to come forward because the last thing a rape victim wants is the case to be publicized.
Sorry if already mentioned but Darby was one of Jameis' teammates heavily mentioned in the case
Check out @JeffBurlew's Twitter feed
Sorry if already mentioned but Darby was one of Jameis' teammates heavily mentioned in the case
Check out @JeffBurlew's Twitter feed
Jameis Winston's teammate Chris Casher -- the witness who told cops JW didn't rape his accuser -- also told police he and the FSU quarterback would often share chicks sexually ... and TMZ Sports has learned, that kind of teammate relationship is shockingly common at colleges across the country.
In the police report, obtained by TMZ, cops say Casher stated that when he went into Jameis' bedroom during his sexual encounter with the accuser, he also asked "if [she] would engage in sexual activity with him as well."
Casher explained that kind of situation had happened in the past with other women they had brought to their apartment.
Read more: Jameis Winston -- TEAMMATE GROUP SEX ... Runs Rampant In College | TMZ.com
I found parts of this article interesting Attorney asks Fla. AG to investigate Winston case - NBC Sports | NBC Sports
In particular this part
The lead detective got a search warrant for her client's cell phone and social media accounts but failed to do the same for Winston and his two companions immediately after the accusations were made, Carroll said.
"The bulk of the investigation was into the rape victim," she said. "I'm looking at an investigation of a rape victim, not a rape suspect."
I found parts of this article interesting Attorney asks Fla. AG to investigate Winston case - NBC Sports | NBC Sports
In particular this part
The lead detective got a search warrant for her client's cell phone and social media accounts but failed to do the same for Winston and his two companions immediately after the accusations were made, Carroll said.
"The bulk of the investigation was into the rape victim," she said. "I'm looking at an investigation of a rape victim, not a rape suspect."
Ronald Darby, FYI.
On Nov. 13, after Tallahassee police turned the case over to Meggs and his staff, Tim Jansen, Winston's attorney, provided them with sworn affidavits from FSU players Casher and Ronald Darby, who said they were in the apartment on the night of the alleged incident. In eight-paragraph statements, Casher and Darby said the accuser followed them out of a bar and willingly climbed into a cab with them. Both players said the woman did not appear to be intoxicated and "was able to have a conversation with us," according to copies of the affidavits.