This Sorority Girl Is NOT Happy

Whiskeyjack

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
IrishLax said:
Dunno who you all hung out with at Notre Dame. She's barely a 7... if that (i.e. 30% hotter, 70% uglier)... really might be closer to a 5 or 6. People tend to skew high, IMO... as they rarely will hand out a 1 or 2 or even a 3 when it is readily deserved. A 3 really isn't that bad... still means they're hotter than almost 1/3 girls.
Click to expand...

You're using a uniform distribution. I think most people assume a normal distribution when using the 1-10 scale. In other words, a strong majority would be considered "average" (4-6).
 
BeauBenken

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
clashmore_mike said:
apparently this is the author of the letter

rebecca-martinson-maryland.png



and now I see pics have already been posted and debated
Click to expand...

Would definitely smash.
 
woolybug25

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Only Notre Dame guys argue the validity of the distribution model used to scale the looks of women. haha
 
ACamp1900

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,946
Reaction score
11,225
She's a 7...

that I would smash.

Since LAX went there though, I can say my wife is hotter... got it in the right places more and has a better face... and I already posted pics... do your own research.
 
Last edited:
felkey72

felkey72

New member
Messages
230
Reaction score
11
I think she might be closer to a 6, although her body might be an 8, but that face just doesnt do it for me.
 
ACamp1900

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,946
Reaction score
11,225
felkey72 said:
I think she might be closer to a 6, although her body might be an 8, but that face just doesnt do it for me.
Click to expand...

Who needs the face when prone is the way to go anyway.....

just sayin
 
woolybug25

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
I'm gonna need pics of your wives, fellas.

To.. you know... check the consistency of the data points.
 
gkIrish

gkIrish

Greek God
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
1,004
That girl is an 8+. Y'all are crazy if you think she is average. Neck is a little long, that's about the only negative thing about her.
 
Last edited:
gkIrish

gkIrish

Greek God
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
1,004
So I have this long post about how to scale a girl from 1-10 typed out but I'm worried I'll be called a pig and get neg repped. Anyone care to take a look in a PM first?
 
gkIrish

gkIrish

Greek God
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
1,004
woolybug25 said:
ben-stiller-do-it.gif
Click to expand...

Here's how I scale things. And frankly it's the way most guys I know scale. Some things to keep in mind:

1. You can't include most celebrities, porn stars, and anyone else who has ever appeared in a magazine on the scale. Totally skews the numbers because they are all hot. So the scale is limited to normal people.

2. Have to define the scale. Is it local or national? Since we are all from different areas of the country, have to use a national scale on this site.

3. If you haven't ever lived in another part of the country, you are probably going to scale on a local level whether you intend to or not. So keep that in mind. Somebody from California is going to have higher standards than someone from Pennsylvania. Vacation doesn't count.

So here's my scale (I've lived in the Midwest, Northeast and Greece/Italy for extended time periods)

9.5-10: No doubters. No physical flaws. Perfect body and a face that's at least in the upper 10% of women. Only about 1-3% of women fit this bill.

8-9.5: Very hot girls. Face is in the top 25%. Body is very good and likely not overweight at all. May have minor issues such as smaller breasts (although some men like that), a small mole, or are shorter/taller than the median. About 15-20% of women should fall in this range. These are girls you would absolutely have no hesitation dating and showing off to your friends.

6-7.5: Average to Above Average: Nothing spectacular about the girl, but nothing bothersome either. May lack in one area but excel in another. This also covers girls with very nice faces but less than stellar bodies. About 30-35% of girls fall in this range. You wouldn't brag about this girl's looks if she was your girlfriend but you wouldn't get ragged on either. Most guys will marry a girl like this as having a wife in the higher ranges creates other problems.

4.5-5.5: Girls with average bodies but a below average face. Or girls that are moderately overweight but are naturally pretty. About 30-35% of women fall in this range. Wouldn't hook up with this girl unless drunk and she grabs your junk or if she becomes a Mermaid.

<4.5: Reserved for girls with clear weight problems and girls you wouldn't hook up with under any circumstance. Bad teeth, excessively hairy arms, etc. All these girls get lumped into this category and it's not really worth defining further. 10-15% of women here.
 
Last edited:
PANDFAN

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
gkIrish said:
Here's how I scale things. And frankly it's the way most guys I know scale. Some things to keep in mind:

1. You can't include most celebrities, porn stars, and anyone else who has ever appeared in a magazine on the scale. Totally skews the numbers because they are all hot. So the scale is limited to normal people.

2. Have to define the scale. Is it local or national? Since we are all from different areas of the country, have to use a national scale on this site.

3. If you haven't ever lived in another part of the country, you are probably going to scale on a local level whether you intend to or not. So keep that in mind. Somebody from California is going to have higher standards than someone from Pennsylvania. Vacation doesn't count.

So here's my scale (I've lived in the Midwest, Northeast and Greece/Itay for extended time periods)

9.5-10: No doubters. No physical flaws. Perfect body and a face that's at least in the upper 10% of women. Only about 1-3% of women fit this bill.

8-9.5: Very hot girls. Face is in the top 25%. Body is very good and likely not overweight at all. May have minor issues such as smaller breasts (although some men like that), a small mole, or are shorter/taller than the median. About 15-20% of women should fall in this range. These are girls you would absolutely have no hesitation dating and showing off to your friends.

6-7.5: Average to Above Average: Nothing spectacular about the girl, but nothing bothersome either. May lack in one area but excel in another. This also covers girls with very nice faces but less than stellar bodies. About 30-35% of girls fall in this range. You wouldn't brag about this girls looks if she was your girlfriend but you wouldn't get ragged on either. Most guys will marry a girl like this as having a wife in the higher ranges creates other problems.

4.5-5.5: Girls with average bodies but a below average face. Or girls that are moderately overweight but are naturally pretty. About 30-35% of women fall in this range. Wouldn't hook up with this girl unless drunk and she grabs your junk or if she becomes a Mermaid.

<4.5: Reserved for girls with clear weight problems and girls you wouldn't hook up with under any circumstance. Bad teeth, excessively hairy arms, etc. All these girls get lumped into this category and it's not really worth defining further. 10-15% of women here.
Click to expand...

PANDFAN
 
felkey72

felkey72

New member
Messages
230
Reaction score
11
gkIrish said:
Here's how I scale things. And frankly it's the way most guys I know scale. Some things to keep in mind:

1. You can't include most celebrities, porn stars, and anyone else who has ever appeared in a magazine on the scale. Totally skews the numbers because they are all hot. So the scale is limited to normal people.

2. Have to define the scale. Is it local or national? Since we are all from different areas of the country, have to use a national scale on this site.

3. If you haven't ever lived in another part of the country, you are probably going to scale on a local level whether you intend to or not. So keep that in mind. Somebody from California is going to have higher standards than someone from Pennsylvania. Vacation doesn't count.

So here's my scale (I've lived in the Midwest, Northeast and Greece/Italy for extended time periods)

9.5-10: No doubters. No physical flaws. Perfect body and a face that's at least in the upper 10% of women. Only about 1-3% of women fit this bill.

8-9.5: Very hot girls. Face is in the top 25%. Body is very good and likely not overweight at all. May have minor issues such as smaller breasts (although some men like that), a small mole, or are shorter/taller than the median. About 15-20% of women should fall in this range. These are girls you would absolutely have no hesitation dating and showing off to your friends.

6-7.5: Average to Above Average: Nothing spectacular about the girl, but nothing bothersome either. May lack in one area but excel in another. This also covers girls with very nice faces but less than stellar bodies. About 30-35% of girls fall in this range. You wouldn't brag about this girls looks if she was your girlfriend but you wouldn't get ragged on either. Most guys will marry a girl like this as having a wife in the higher ranges creates other problems.

4.5-5.5: Girls with average bodies but a below average face. Or girls that are moderately overweight but are naturally pretty. About 30-35% of women fall in this range. Wouldn't hook up with this girl unless drunk and she grabs your junk or if she becomes a Mermaid.

<4.5: Reserved for girls with clear weight problems and girls you wouldn't hook up with under any circumstance. Bad teeth, excessively hairy arms, etc. All these girls get lumped into this category and it's not really worth defining further. 10-15% of women here.
Click to expand...

Pretty spot on man
 
Irish#1

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
After reading that, I would question the wisdom of any guy who would want to be her boyfriend. Your life would be a roller coaster. Seeing clearer pics, she's a 6.5 end of debate.
 
woolybug25

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
gkIrish said:
Here's how I scale things. And frankly it's the way most guys I know scale. Some things to keep in mind:

1. You can't include most celebrities, porn stars, and anyone else who has ever appeared in a magazine on the scale. Totally skews the numbers because they are all hot. So the scale is limited to normal people.

2. Have to define the scale. Is it local or national? Since we are all from different areas of the country, have to use a national scale on this site.

3. If you haven't ever lived in another part of the country, you are probably going to scale on a local level whether you intend to or not. So keep that in mind. Somebody from California is going to have higher standards than someone from Pennsylvania. Vacation doesn't count.

So here's my scale (I've lived in the Midwest, Northeast and Greece/Italy for extended time periods)

9.5-10: No doubters. No physical flaws. Perfect body and a face that's at least in the upper 10% of women. Only about 1-3% of women fit this bill.

8-9.5: Very hot girls. Face is in the top 25%. Body is very good and likely not overweight at all. May have minor issues such as smaller breasts (although some men like that), a small mole, or are shorter/taller than the median. About 15-20% of women should fall in this range. These are girls you would absolutely have no hesitation dating and showing off to your friends.

6-7.5: Average to Above Average: Nothing spectacular about the girl, but nothing bothersome either. May lack in one area but excel in another. This also covers girls with very nice faces but less than stellar bodies. About 30-35% of girls fall in this range. You wouldn't brag about this girl's looks if she was your girlfriend but you wouldn't get ragged on either. Most guys will marry a girl like this as having a wife in the higher ranges creates other problems.

4.5-5.5: Girls with average bodies but a below average face. Or girls that are moderately overweight but are naturally pretty. About 30-35% of women fall in this range. Wouldn't hook up with this girl unless drunk and she grabs your junk or if she becomes a Mermaid.

<4.5: Reserved for girls with clear weight problems and girls you wouldn't hook up with under any circumstance. Bad teeth, excessively hairy arms, etc. All these girls get lumped into this category and it's not really worth defining further. 10-15% of women here.
Click to expand...

So I take it that you aren't one for "hoggin'"?

Shoot... Irishog doesn't leave this area of expertise. One could say, he's cornered the market.
 
PANDFAN

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
gkIrish said:
Na man. That **** grows back thicker than ever. And why waste time trying to fix a girl anyway?
Click to expand...

if she doesn't care enough to shave the pits what makes you think she is taking care of other grooming habits down there????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top