B
Bogtrotter07
Guest
Carslile could still be there in '15. As will CJ.
Carslile could still be there in '15. As will CJ.
In 2015, Bryant, Folston, and Hood will all be in that backfield.
Rather brain-reeling, but how does Kelly get them the ball? {Sure, somebody may not work out, but with these three guys the odds that any of them are flops seems VERY small.}
Prosise?
My man he is slot/wrYers.
My man he is slot/wr
Word. Watch out for James Onwualu. He is perfect for the slot/RB spot.Yers, he iss. But did you see the end around in the spring game? They are going to bring the slot into the backfield as another hands on the ball kind of guy, here. I will bet my next to last dollar. Better yet, ask TP.
Does anyone think he has a done enough to move up in the rankings to around 96?
He should've been at least 97 or 98 before the SPARQ camp. 247 is slacking abit on his recruiting. Should be a 5-star across the board. IMO, he should move up to 98 or 99. Only RB that should be ranked higher is Fournette.
Nelson is likely a significant mover. Hood should go up some, too.
JC Shurburtt
Hood is currently a 93 Rating
Nelson is currently a 90 Rating, #21 OT (lol).
I would expect Nelson to be Top 10 OT.
When are they updating? I can't seem to find it
He should've been at least 97 or 98 before the SPARQ camp. 247 is slacking abit on his recruiting. Should be a 5-star across the board. IMO, he should move up to 98 or 99. Only RB that should be ranked higher is Fournette.
Fournette, Mixon, then Hood.
I wish 247 would list him as a RB rather than as an Athlete (#8 by 247). If they did, he would be ranked the #12 RB by 247 (too low) and #7 RB according to the composite rankings (pretty accurate IMO).
I agree with you though, 93 seems a bit low for him and he will probably get a bump to the 95-97 range, but I don't agree with NDSean about being a 98-99. I fear my friend has had a bit too much Irish Whiskey this evening.![]()
Not true at all. Perfectly sober when I wrote that. I'm basing it off what I've seen. And I'm not the only one who thinks this. Rivals has him as the #3 RB in the class and 5 stars.
Not true at all. Perfectly sober when I wrote that. I'm basing it off what I've seen. And I'm not the only one who thinks this. Rivals has him as the #3 RB in the class and 5 stars.
Irish Whiskey, Irish Koolaid, same thing. I was joking. Tom Lemming also has him as the #3 RB in the country so you're in good company. Rivals #3 RB, ESPN #8 RB, Scout #11 RB, 247 #12 (if ranked as RB). I agree 247 is slacking as you said.
I'm excited to see what he can do in a spread offense. He basically plays FB for a single-wing HS team against loaded boxes that know he's getting the ball and his stats are still ridiculous.
Fournette, Mixon, then Hood.
Then why no note in his timeline or change in rating history graph?
Also, they've already done some updates.
Big bump in updated 247 rankings. #17wr, #122 overall (up 285 spots), 94 rating.
Then why no note in his timeline or change in rating history graph?
Also, they've already done some updates.
I don't know but the Weishar, Brent, & Hood updates were on 6/17. ShakeDown posted them in some threads, I noticed it in Brent's thread.
I noticed this the other day. Hood was a 94 when the initial rankings came out. At some point they dropped him to a 93 but didn't note it on his timeline. It's not his "new" ranking.
STL:
is that for an EE?