IrishSteelhead
All Flair, No Substance
- Messages
- 11,114
- Reaction score
- 4,686
After seeing an episode of "my super sweet 16" on MTV, nothing shocks me when dealing with kids.
I believe he faxed it in the AM, but had his announcement scheduled for the evening, and the cat was let out of the bag before then or something along those lines.
It's funny though, because I remember we were all on here trying to watch the feed on pins on needles. You'd think if it was revealed earlier, somebody here would have scooped it beforehand.
*i may be wrong, but this is what my memory tells me
The thing was, I knew it already, but didnt want to ruin the surprise for everyone. Got a PM about a month before NSD.
A thread discussing LOI should be made instead.
The important question is weather or not that thread would also be about spelling bee nightmares?
I'm over it. Time to turn the page.
The important question is weather or not that thread would also be about spelling bee nightmares?
The important question is weather or not that thread would also be about spelling bee nightmares?
We could go back to Vander nick names! With all this hate and venom I'm sure we could come up some great endings now!
The best way to fix the NLOI program is to make it a four year commitment by the schools. That would cut schools abilities to gray shirt. Force universities to spend more time educating their athletes (who wants to lose their stars) because replacement on a four year scholarship basis would be too unpredictable and costly. (Same problem ND has now when players leave. It takes a while to replace a player, thus forcing a 'bad' school to dip way below their 85 man limit.)
And in many cases the school gets an athlete who brings much more value than the value of that education. If there are athletes who have the talent that they can successfully get a school to take them without a NLI, more power to them. Some schools will pass, some will try it out.
Schools are making millions and millions. Kids can afford to have a little power, too.
The only issue I have with that recommendation is that if the school is forced to give a four year commitment then the player should as well. And that is never going to happen as the NFL is a talent driven league... if you have the talent they want you as soon as they can get you.
I think holding commitments to LOI's unless there is a bonafide family related issue is the best way to curtail players from backing out. The whole EV ordeal will pass but the fact that the Irish didn't back off from the LOI will speak volumes moving forward for players who waffle on their decision pre and post signing day.
For the love of God, please stop buying into the "slave labor" innuendo that these muckrakers keep tossing out there. What are these schools doing with these millions and millions? It's not like a bunch of old white guys are amassing tremendous personal wealth on the backs of these poor kids who can barely afford to drive their Lexus or Land Rover. Most of these Universities are using those millions and millions to allow thousands of other kids to have an opportunity that they would never have had, otherwise: A college education. These kids get a decent stipend, they travel in first class style, they get per diem while on the road, they get access to academic resources that other students could only dream of......... they are not exploited sweat shop workers in Indonesia, toiling away for $1 a day!
For the love of God, please stop buying into the "slave labor" innuendo that these muckrakers keep tossing out there. What are these schools doing with these millions and millions? It's not like a bunch of old white guys are amassing tremendous personal wealth on the backs of these poor kids who can barely afford to drive their Lexus or Land Rover. Most of these Universities are using those millions and millions to allow thousands of other kids to have an opportunity that they would never have had, otherwise: A college education. These kids get a decent stipend, they travel in first class style, they get per diem while on the road, they get access to academic resources that other students could only dream of......... they are not exploited sweat shop workers in Indonesia, toiling away for $1 a day!
For the love of God, please stop buying into the "slave labor" innuendo that these muckrakers keep tossing out there. What are these schools doing with these millions and millions? It's not like a bunch of old white guys are amassing tremendous personal wealth on the backs of these poor kids who can barely afford to drive their Lexus or Land Rover. Most of these Universities are using those millions and millions to allow thousands of other kids to have an opportunity that they would never have had, otherwise: A college education. These kids get a decent stipend, they travel in first class style, they get per diem while on the road, they get access to academic resources that other students could only dream of......... they are not exploited sweat shop workers in Indonesia, toiling away for $1 a day!
As a UCLA fan, I'm thrilled that Eddie Vanderdoes will play for the Bruins, but I'm obviously disappointed that Notre Dame is playing hardball and won't release him from his National Letter of Intent, thus costing him an entire year of eligibility. From Notre Dame's perspective, I semi-understand wanting to hold a high school senior to his commitment. But from a practical perspective, aren't the Irish shooting themselves in the foot? Will other coaches cite this instance to negatively recruit against Notre Dame? I don't seem to recall Brian Kelly sitting out a year when he left Cincinnati in the middle of a contract.
-- Jason Kingston, Los Angeles
I don't think anyone is going to use it to negatively in recruiting because they'd all do the exact same thing. I can't imagine any coaches are pitching recruits by telling them, "If you sign with us, we'll let you change your mind." As Andy Staples wrote on Tuesday, neither Kelly nor Florida State's Jimbo Fisher (who is refusing to release touted linebacker Matthew Thomas) wants to be the coach who sets the precedent that allows future recruits to start disregarding NLIs entirely.
Also, as Andy wrote, the NLI contract is entirely one-sided. Much like our discussion in the last Mailbag about Mike Gundy blocking Lunt's transfer options, it reeks of hypocrisy given the fact that coaches routinely break contracts. But even if the current NLI were scrapped, there would still need to be some sort of binding commitment from recruits. There comes a fair point -- whether it's the first Wednesday in February or some later date -- when coaches need to know if they should still hold a scholarship spot open or move on to someone else. Otherwise they could never fill out their class. And there are more logistics involved with bringing in a player than just handing him his practice gear. Dorm rooms need to be reserved. He needs to enroll in classes. However, when a situation like Vanderdoes' does arise, there should be some lesser form of recourse than losing an entire season of eligibility.
For the love of God, please stop buying into the "slave labor" innuendo that these muckrakers keep tossing out there. What are these schools doing with these millions and millions? It's not like a bunch of old white guys are amassing tremendous personal wealth on the backs of these poor kids who can barely afford to drive their Lexus or Land Rover. Most of these Universities are using those millions and millions to allow thousands of other kids to have an opportunity that they would never have had, otherwise: A college education. These kids get a decent stipend, they travel in first class style, they get per diem while on the road, they get access to academic resources that other students could only dream of......... they are not exploited sweat shop workers in Indonesia, toiling away for $1 a day!