- Messages
- 20,894
- Reaction score
- 8,126
Yea, thats a pretty ridiculous point. Saying that is we took Treadwell over EO that are defense would somehow be comparable to WV's is insane.
I didn't say I'd take EO over LT. Let's assume we've got 4 spots left, and EO wants in immediately. Do we take him? Maybe. At least we should give it serious thought, since DL is a major need for us, and he's a solid 4
recruit with significant upside potential. We'd obviously hold 2 of the remaining spots for AQM and Redfield, which means one of either Treadwell or Folston gets left out.And OMM didn't say we'd suddenly be WVU if we passed on EO. It's about priorities; defense wins championships, and DL is our #1 position of need. We're full at WR. Yes, LT is a better prospect overall, but you can't recruit with a blind eye toward the areas of need on your depth chart.
No offense but Tuitt and Nix are rolling right now.
And they both may be gone after 2013. Gotta look further ahead than one year.