Who is Likely Next (2013)

Messages
2,475
Reaction score
237
Right, the reality is that no one is going to have to choose between Carlo and Mack. We have a spot reserved for an elite DB; if Mack wants it, he better speak up, or it's going to Redfield/Hawkins/Willis/Moore/Luke. Even if someone else speaks up first, and then Mack decided he wanted in, we could probably still take Mack instead of Folston/other slot/RB player. Not sure how bad the staff wants another slot/RB, but I don't see that we really need one this year; could be wrong. But that's the hard choice: between Mack and another offensive 2013 player. There is no choice between an experienced ILB like Carlo and Mack, when we NEED experience at ILB next year and we don't need four cornerbacks in the 2013 class.

This is where things get tricky. Fox and Carlo play the same position, so only one will be on the field and IMO that's where experience helps the most (See Zeke showing players what to do before the snap). At Mike we have Grace who will be a Jr and Moore will be Sr, they shouldn't need that much help.

The only thing is injuries, if Fox gets hurt then it will likely be a walk on in Schmidt or a true freshman playing.

Lastly never said it had to be Mack (although he is most likely going all the way to SD which makes him an obvious candidate). I'm saying we have X spots if we take back all 5 5th year guys. So who gets bumped if a star wants to come, I say Carlo every time.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
This is where things get tricky. Fox and Carlo play the same position, so only one will be on the field and IMO that's where experience helps the most (See Zeke showing players what to do before the snap). At Mike we have Grace who will be a Jr and Moore will be Sr, they shouldn't need that much help.

The coaching staff has allegedly been telling recruits that the physical profiles and responsibilities of Diaco's WILB and MILB are virtually identical. The main difference is that the MILB "quarterbacks" the front-7 by calling out shifts, etc. Thus, it's very possible that Calabrese could end up as our starting MILB, given his extensive experience, instead of Grace.
 
G

Grahambo

Guest
U can move people out of position to play OLB in NDs scheme...but its important to have a middle linebacker at middle linebacker. Spond is an outside guy who can work in space. MLB is the exact opposite. Fox as we all know showed that it takes a full yr to get used to playing inside. Its alot more than just learning plays. Its recognition/exp/flow...thats something you dont tinker with.

Reps.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,769
Reaction score
10,146
Thought it would post this in here and not sure what to make of it. But some of the pretty consistant USC posters on rivals have already written off Redfield stating he's eventually gonna be on his way here. Now that could be classic over reaction to recruiting like we all know and love. Or maybe they have heard something more substantail. The same guy also said that Hawkins isn't going anywhere and that his dad already posted that today. However I wasn't able to find that.
 

Ricochet

Well-known member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
295
So you guys are willing to trade 3/4 years of a player like Mack for 1 more year of Carlo???
Yes. Willing to trade a 5th year players for elite prospects majority of the time. Carlo is a nice player but IMO if Fox is back there is no question you trade Carlo for one of the elite prospects.
 

jason_h537

The King is Back
Messages
6,945
Reaction score
581
Carlo is far from useless, he is a run stuffing middle linebacker. He struggles against coverage but he plays with a mean streak the team needs. He should be playing Te'os position but obviously that spot is taken. I do not know whether they will bring him back or not but I am certain Kelly will not bring back both Fox and Calabrese.
 

ryno 24

Well-known member
Messages
2,419
Reaction score
100
It sounds like Grace and Moore will be playing Manti's spot next year. They fit the mold better I believe. Correct me if I am wrong?
 

jmurphy75

Well-known member
Messages
1,036
Reaction score
63
U can move people out of position to play OLB in NDs scheme...but its important to have a middle linebacker at middle linebacker. Spond is an outside guy who can work in space. MLB is the exact opposite. Fox as we all know showed that it takes a full yr to get used to playing inside. Its alot more than just learning plays. Its recognition/exp/flow...thats something you dont tinker with.
Exactly
 

Irishman77

Well-known member
Messages
5,132
Reaction score
445

Good thing nonemof our starters ever switch positions. Can you imagine if a rb was asked to play defense? Impossible! Who needs versatility in kellys system....forgot italics. Anyay like i said i would only consider this if councell was a boss next year. Ayway love the debate and opposing views.
 

jmurphy75

Well-known member
Messages
1,036
Reaction score
63
Good thing nonemof our starters ever switch positions. Can you imagine if a rb was asked to play defense? Impossible! Who needs versatility in kellys system....forgot italics. Anyay like i said i would only consider this if councell was a boss next year. Ayway love the debate and opposing views.

I'm not saying a position change can't be done, I'm saying why risk it if you have 2 proven starters able to return.
 

NDhoosier

Well-known member
Messages
2,706
Reaction score
346
I dont think we should ask back both Fox and Calabrese either... Grace has been praised quite a bit by Diaco... The only reason he isnt playing that much is because he is playing behind Te'o. I think we all can admit that is a pretty good reason to be benched. If you think about it, the only spots we will be seeing "new" people at is Safety (Motta's spot) and MLB (Teo's spot). Only two spots we need to replace, I think having Grace step in there and prove he is a stud that has been sitting only because he was playing behind a legend is acceptable. I would rather replace 2 spots every year instead of 8 spots every 2 years.

2 DBs, only if one is elite (Redfield, Alexander, Willis)
A. Muhammad
Folston
 

pkt77242

IPA Man
Messages
10,805
Reaction score
719
I dont think we should ask back both Fox and Calabrese either... Grace has been praised quite a bit by Diaco... The only reason he isnt playing that much is because he is playing behind Te'o. I think we all can admit that is a pretty good reason to be benched. If you think about it, the only spots we will be seeing "new" people at is Safety (Motta's spot) and MLB (Teo's spot). Only two spots we need to replace, I think having Grace step in there and prove he is a stud that has been sitting only because he was playing behind a legend is acceptable. I would rather replace 2 spots every year instead of 8 spots every 2 years.

2 DBs, only if one is elite (Redfield, Alexander, Willis)
A. Muhammad
Folston

DE as well as KAP is gone.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
So I've been considering our roster in light of the scholarship crunch and the remaining "big fish" we've got a good shot at closing with, and there seems to be a disconnect between those kids and our positions of need.

QB: 5/4.
RB/ Z WR: Assuming Wood goes pro, 8/8.
X/W WR: 8/8, though Robinson could end up at TE.
TE: 4/4, though one could argue we need more than 4 TEs with Kelly's new-found love of 12 and 13 personnel.
OL: 13-15, depending on Watt and Z. Martin.
DL: 9/12.
ILB: 6-7, depending on Carlo & Fox; Rabasa likely moves back inside.
OLB: 8-9, though Rabasa and Mattingly could get moved.
CB: 8/8, though Shumate could move back to SS.
S: 7/8, though Shumate could fill it out.

The only real position of need for us is on the DL, particularly at DT. But most of the big names left on our board are DBs, RBs, and an OLB. Do we simply not have a shot with any other elite DL this year, or am I missing something with our DL numbers? And what if Matuska ends up at TE for some reason?
 
Last edited:

DCIrish

New member
Messages
336
Reaction score
37
The only real position of need for us is on the DL, particularly at DT. But most of the big names left on our board are DBs, RBs, and an OLB. Do we simply not have a shot with any other elite DL this year, or am I missing something with our DL numbers? And what if Matuska ends up at TE for some reason?

I also think think they need more DL in this class. The DL is big reason why this team is winning and they need as much depth as possible to make sure that continues. The only player I think they may have a shot with right now is Austin Hooper.
 

Emcee77

latress on the men-jay
Messages
7,295
Reaction score
555
Yep this has been bothering me as well. Puzzling that it obviously doesn't bother the staff. It has been clear that they are fine with Matuska and Rochell in this class. Bear in mind that the thinking is that A. Muhammad will bulk up into a DL, but it has always seemed to me that we need at least one more pure DL.
 
Last edited:

Irishman77

Well-known member
Messages
5,132
Reaction score
445
I agree about dt and think that is the focus in 14. Trumbetti,jay hayes,enoch smith and Mr. Malik Mcdowell would do....
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
Assuming, as some have said, that A. Muhammad is already factored in... do you think the staff takes Folston? That'd leave only ~1 spot for another DB.

Also, the way things are going right now, I wouldn't be totally shocked to see Wood come back for another year... which most people aren't counting on right now.
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Assuming, as some have said, that A. Muhammad is already factored in... do you think the staff takes Folston? That'd leave only ~1 spot for another DB.

Also, the way things are going right now, I wouldn't be totally shocked to see Wood come back for another year... which most people aren't counting on right now.

I would be shocked at Cierre leaving too. This is his stat line halfway through the season.

ATT YDS AVG LNG TD REC YDS AVG LNG TD
47 279 5.9 37 2 2 9 4.5 9 0

Unless he is fine with being drafted in rounds 4-6, then he should consider coming back for a big senior season.
 

GoldenIsThyFame

Well-known member
Messages
10,899
Reaction score
789
Assuming, as some have said, that A. Muhammad is already factored in... do you think the staff takes Folston? That'd leave only ~1 spot for another DB.

Also, the way things are going right now, I wouldn't be totally shocked to see Wood come back for another year... which most people aren't counting on right now.

I don't think Martin has played at an NFL level either to be honest. If we bring back Wood, Martin and Watt then only one of Carlo or Fox could come back. Also are we really only going to have one kicker on the entire roster in Brindza?
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
I don't think Martin has played at an NFL level either to be honest. If we bring back Wood, Martin and Watt then only one of Carlo or Fox could come back. Also are we really only going to have one kicker on the entire roster in Brindza?

I know this isn't the popular answer, but I think we should. I know Tausch got hurt this year, but Brindza is a big, strong kid and kickers don't battle a lot of injuries. If he got hurt, there is someone on the team could finish out a game for us. Then after that, scout the soccer team for a replacement.

Kickers, man...
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
I know this isn't the popular answer, but I think we should. I know Tausch got hurt this year, but Brindza is a big, strong kid and kickers don't battle a lot of injuries. If he got hurt, there is someone on the team could finish out a game for us. Then after that, scout the soccer team for a replacement.

Kickers, man...

i agree 100% with you...but if he does somehow get injured on a KR or punting...game on the line and we need a FG to win....my tune would change..

win win: preferred walk on ???
 

GoldenIsThyFame

Well-known member
Messages
10,899
Reaction score
789
I know this isn't the popular answer, but I think we should. I know Tausch got hurt this year, but Brindza is a big, strong kid and kickers don't battle a lot of injuries. If he got hurt, there is someone on the team could finish out a game for us. Then after that, scout the soccer team for a replacement.

Kickers, man...

Haha, who? Is Heggie gonna kick it? I am good with not using another scholly on a kicker but we definitely need to pick someone up from interhall.
 

felkey72

New member
Messages
230
Reaction score
11
I think we will be fine with dine as long as we get a good crop next year, and maybe the staff feels better about next years class. What worries me is nose tackle, if Nix were to leave we would be screwed.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
You should be able to find 5-10 kids who are pretty good at kicking/punting and want an elite education. Then you find the 2-3 that can afford it as walk-ons and sign them up. There is absolutely no reason to use a scholarship on a backup K/P in our current situation... you tell them they can earn a scholarship a la Ruffer if they play well.
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Haha, who? Is Heggie gonna kick it? I am good with not using another scholly on a kicker but we definitely need to pick someone up from interhall.

I don't know who, but I promise you that if the coaches had a 15 minute tryout for any player currently on the team that wanted to be the backup punter/kicker that one of them would be able to do it. It's kicking dude. I can kick an extra point and punt at least 30 yards, I have no doubt that there is an athlete currently on the roster that could do the same. If Brindza actually got hurt, we could look at interhall, but we could cross that bridge if we came to it.

Heggie can probably kick bombs, just sayin'...
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
dont sleep on Jude Rhodes!!

This kid is only a junior and is a walk-on so we would have a back up.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gbevxcyyt0Q" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9ozr9e6fKLw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Top