Who'saWildManNow
Bald Prick
- Messages
- 3,863
- Reaction score
- 485
The Yankees (and this Derek Jeter saga) represent everything that is wrong with baseball today. APac is right. If he weren't on the Yankees he wouldn't be getting half the attention he's getting now. He shouldn't be an all-star this season by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, he's been one of the worst short stops in the AL this season and if he hadn't pulled out of the ASG b/c of injury he would've been starting. (The ASG voting system is flawed but that's a whole other argument). The point is, ESPN and MLB push so hard to get ratings that it's hard for casual fans to see any other teams than the Yankees, BoSox, Phils, etc. It's no wonder half the country is made up of freaking Yankee fans if they play on half the nat'l TV games every year. If you're a casual fan sitting at home just watching whatever ESPN throws at you, you're bound to become at least a slight Yankees fan b/c THAT'S ALL YOU SEE. You'll rarely see someone born in North Dakota nowhere near a professional team become a fan of, for example, the Kansas City Royals, who are on nat'l TV maybe once a year.
I know it's driven by ratings etc. etc. and this is a business etc. etc. but one of the reasons baseball is losing fans to football is the extreme lack of parity between the teams. In the NFL, every team has an equal chance to succeed because every team has a salary cap. In MLB, the league basically says by not having a salary cap "we'll give you the World Series if you have a high payroll." It's not so much a competition between organizations as it is a competition between owners' wallets, and very few teams are fortunate enough to be able to stick with the big boys for that reason. It's impossible for small market teams to attract big time free agents because of the lack of spending money, and it's extremely difficult for them to keep their own homegrown talent for the same reason. Small market teams might as well become farm teams for the big market teams because that's really all they are, in effect. Take the Twins for example. They have had a few years of successful baseball, and now have some money to spend. So they spend it on the homegrown superstar, and it looks like a good deal for them. But so far, it hasn't worked out. And if it doesn't, that one contract will absolutely CRIPPLE them for its duration. Teams like the Yankees, with deeper pockets, have twice the room for error because they can just spend even more money. Carl Pavano deal doesn't pan out? That's ok, we'll just go buy CC Sabathia. No worries. Small market teams with less money to work with have razor thin margins for error, and thus will not be competitive NEARLY as often as big market teams. MLB will point to a team like the Rays and say "see? there's parity!" but there is absolutely no denying that the Yankees, BoSox, Phils, etc. will win more WS championships than the other teams because they can outspend them.
And THAT'S just the beginning of the problem.
Phew. Felt good to get that off my chest.
Also, roll Tribe.
If I wasn't so tired right now I'd argue your whole post. But, for now I'll leave it to the bolded statement. Jeter is literally the first player to spend his whole career as a Yankee and reach 3000 hits. It's a big deal no matter what team you play for. Your beef with your cheap organization pocketing it's revenue sharing (a lot of it coming from the Yankees), rather than spending it on top players is irrelevant to Jeter's accomplishment.
If your owner in 1995 was George Steinbrenner, you would have kept Lofton, Vizquel, Baerga, Belle, Murray, Thome, Ramirez and Alomar.. and you'd be singing a different tune these days. He might have gotten you a pitcher or two as well.. being that was the reason you lost to the Braves.
Last edited:
