I agree with ESPN's Matt Schick . . .
I agree with ESPN's Matt Schick . . .
and his comment that the Committee might have gotten "a little too cute last week, by putting TCU at No. 3, and that they have now painted themselves into a corner, as a result of it."
basically, if they are going to now drop TCU below OSU, then they MUST also drop FSU below BOTH OSU and TCU, because they just said last week that they thought TCU was better than FSU, and nothing really happened yesterday, that SHOULD change that view.
so, by logic, FSU would have to be the team on the outs. again, all because the Committee was too cute last week, by putting TCU over FSU.
but, most likely, the Committee will end up putting both FSU and OSU in, which makes no sense, as it relates to TCU vs FSU.
their ONLY justification will be if they now say they discounted BOTH TCU and Baylor, as a result of Oklahoma losing to Oklahoma State.
but if that is your argument, then what about Northwestern beating Wisconsin, and how that relates to Ohio State's win over Wisconsin yesterday?
and I especially like Schick's other comment that, if they now put TCU at No. 5, then why are we even having these weekly votes? they have zero meaning.
P.S. This may also be a situation where the Committee throws in the "key injuries" argument, I.e., that OSU had a key injury (i.e., Braxton Miller) in its loss to Va Tech. But if that is their argument, why wait until now, to make it?
PPS. Even Joey Galloway (Ohio State grad) is making this exact same point re TCU right now, on ESPN.