Irish YJ
Southsida
- Messages
- 25,888
- Reaction score
- 1,444
So lets ignore for a moment the veracity of your claims about there being stuff to be proud of...as all such claims apply a standard of "working" or "good" not universally experienced by all...and lets focus on the political strategy.
You seem to be alluding to the fact that all the political strategists and polsters don't have a clue...or that their view of things was simply ignored??? Put it this way, if the little propeller heads in the dark room thought that having folks tout the "accomplishments" you seem to think are brag worthy...don't you think that would have happened? Had the little propeller heads thought association with the President was a good thing, don't you think they'd have advised their folks to drag him in...
Is it possible more people currently DON'T like the results of the policies, now they can see results, and now the man is toxic?
Except I'm not. Which I've made crystal clear.
I just pointed out that there is an extremely basic and accepted Political Science principal that shows people with the "I can't believe you didn't vote" mantra are either uninformed or illogical. You pick. This is NOT opinion. It is also NOT opinion that your one singular vote treated as an independent choice for one individual HAS NEVER EVER MATTERED in United States federal elections.
And then I stated I, personally, made the choice to not vote because I personally was not willing/able to sacrifice the time. Which is my prerogative and nothing more.
Depends. Plenty of items that can be passed through bipartisan methods. As much as we all like to believe there is gridlock, both major parties do have some bipartisan agreements on important issues. As far as the fundamental disagreements, that's always harder no matter who is in the majority. I will say this. I think it is very important that the Republican leadership show that they can get some things done. And that's gonna take some compromise on their part as well. To me, the key issue will be whether the President accepts what bipartisan measures come out from both houses. If he makes it difficult, all parties involved lose in the end.
I'd rep ya if I could, but I've got to spread the love.
Except I'm not. Which I've made crystal clear.
I just pointed out that there is an extremely basic and accepted Political Science principal that shows people with the "I can't believe you didn't vote" mantra are either uninformed or illogical. You pick. This is NOT opinion. It is also NOT opinion that your one singular vote treated as an independent choice for one individual HAS NEVER EVER MATTERED in United States federal elections.
And then I stated I, personally, made the choice to not vote because I personally was not willing/able to sacrifice the time. Which is my prerogative and nothing more.
I have no problem with the idea that one singular vote treated as an individual choice for one individual has never mattered in US federal elections. That still does not change the fact that you made voting out to be pointless for all.Why? Voter's paradox is a very real thing. Your individual choice to vote or not vote is irrelevant to election results. I worked from 7 AM to 2 AM yesterday. No way I was wasting my time to wait in a 30 minute line.
However, it seems as though you are not being genuine. You made it clear that you would be wasting your time to vote. That is very different from choosing not to vote. It is the reason you chose not to vote. Which again is your prerogative.
I have no problem with the idea that one singular vote treated as an individual choice for one individual has never mattered in US federal elections. That still does not change the fact that you made voting out to be pointless for all.
OK I see where you're coming from here.
Exactly, and I see how you could imply I'm saying it's a "waste" for anyone... where really what I'm saying is to me it's a "waste" because my vote would not make any tangible impact on any policies/candidates I support AND my time spent elsewhere would be more productive or fun or in general have a higher net utility positive.
It's not a "waste" on any level to someone who derives any kind of utility from the process of voting, as that's all intrinsic to the person voting and opinion. I tried to say this in subsequent posts, but those posts were long and verbose so I understand if that didn't come through.
If that's the crux of everything, just change "waste" to "spend" and I think it better makes the point I was going for.
Ehhhh... definitely not "pointless for all"... and I do think that part is pretty clearly articulated.
Agree with everything except the whole "Dirty liberal hippies aren't dumb" part....![]()
OK, its a joke. Now what?
I think a legit third party of non-pandering, mindful, average Joes could restore some faith over time. With social media, messages should be easily and cheaply be disseminated. You have to start with Congress though. You should be able to find these well known, well liked individuals in most Congressional districts. If you got 10 or 20 Independent Congressmen, they suddenly become the tipping point votes for most legislation. They also get to caucus with either party, so guess what, they are always in positions of power and have leverage to negotiate key committee appointments.
Third party is the only way I see out of this mess, but on the legislative side, not executive.
me threeme too
![]()
I for one definitely put more weight on social matters.Yeah, I for one definitely put more weight on fiscal matters...
Careful now. This is one dirty hippie liberal who not only has the power of speech, but also knows how to write cogently.
You're jus' one of them there incest prone rednecks, ain't ya?

IMO, the Dems deserved to take the hit they took last night. They abandoned the president and his policies and treated him like a pariah. In doing so, they did not talk about the many months of job growth, the expansion of the economy, and health insurance being available to millions of uninsured Americans. They fell into the same old bad habit of letting the GOP set the agenda of issues, so in the days leading up to the election I heard politicians talking about how ISIS and ebola was Obama's fault, instead of having Democrat candidates pointing out how wrong the GOP was when they tried to reverse Obamacare 50 times. Their shameless disloyalty to the president and the priciples of the party almost ensured the losses they suffered last night. And now, the man that they treated as a leaper is the only thing that will prevent all of the progress that has been made from being systematically dismantled. I hope he has his veto pen ready as the GOP tries to roll back banking regulation, force the Keystone pipeline from threatening the environment, reversing the gains in insured citizens, and the gutting of the social safety net.
Haven't been able to post much lately. Engulfed in new job. Couldn't resist coming back for today and seeing this haha.
1) Dems abandoned Obama because he is their problem, not their solution. This election was about the Dems' failed policies, plain and simple. Repubs got the same in 2006, although not this ugly.
2) Talk about job growth? The economy? Middle class income is down 8% under Obama, the rich are getting richer, and we're at the lowest labor participation rate since WWII. Not much to brag about.
3) Obamacare: 28 senators who voted for it got their asses sent home. Americans want it repealed.
4) We will agree that very little is going to happen in the next 2 years. GOP should play its cards right for 2016 because Obama is still hell bent on fundamental transformation.
Are you a governor or senator? lots of new hires I hear.
Shhhhh...my chief of staff will take my tablet away if he sees me on IE.
J, you've been around this place how long and you haven't bought the unlimited rep thingy?
Need a short term lone with high interest?