Jfc y’all can’t even laugh at stupid comedy. Holy shit. Y’all are some seriously dumb people if you actually thought that was a serious tweet. This is seriously perplexing. You can’t laugh at Cheeto and ketchup fingerprints. A corner of the paper were eaten off. Lol. Kind of concerning actually. Maybe you are not dumb and you just can’t handle people making fun of your cult of personality? Maybe you really do have such a thin veneer than any humor is lost on you. Blame me. That’s fine. Don’t bother me. Haha.Cack got caught posting fake stuff so many times he’s now intentionally posting fake stuff so he can say it’s all in fun.
Stop posting fake pictures dude.
You're being awfully defensive. I just answered your question.No one is arguing the dynamics of the two. Taking away his law license was like telling him he can't eat anymore at a restaurant he hadn't dined at in the last 20 years.
For those of you who think I or anyone else is defending Trump, better go back to school for reading comprehension. What's been pointed out is 1) How this is being handled; 2) That it's political; 3) The indictments were written in such a manner that this may not hold water; 4) "This is it baby, Trump is going away" rhetoric which hasn't happened after so many claims before.
I've made it clear before that I liked what happened (economy, policy, etc.) while he was POTUS. I also made it clear that I was not a fan of how he conducted himself. I have said numerous times as others who you think are defending Trump, that I hope he goes away. Once again for the record, I didn't vote for Trump in either election.
I don’t know why they are behaving this way. I mean the people directly under Trump who took part in this conspiracy have already been convicted and done time for the same crimes and agreed to cooperate. The other party to the conspiracy signed a non-prosecution agreement to not do time. Makes no sense.You're being awfully defensive. I just answered your question.
FYI, those kinds of unwarranted and unnecessary comments comes across as the opposite.
Maybe schooling is actually in your future...?
A symbolic gesture? Lol. Clinton is the definition of a self-centered idiot and the actions in question sorta prove that.Clinton wasn't a self centered idiot, he made a deal which included him giving up his law license
I’m not into drama but I’d suspect that they follow his words, and believe his ever changing lies because they share a major trait… like trump, they also have small hands !!!I don’t know why they are behaving this way. I mean the people directly under Trump who took part in this conspiracy have already been convicted and done time for the same crimes and agreed to cooperate. The other party to the conspiracy signed a non-prosecution agreement to not do time. Makes no sense.
I’m referring to the point of knowing when fold em… and know when to hold emA symbolic gesture? Lol. Clinton is the definition of a self-centered idiot and the actions in question sorta prove that.
Objectively - Biden is nowhere close to the level of corruption that Trump has enjoyed. Subjectively - Biden is not as stupid as Trump IMO.Uh, c'mon man, have you seen the, uh, the, umm, uh, you know man, the uh, the, the thing in the White House right now?
Hillary did go through an FBI investigation, and the DOJ under DJT did investigate her as well.They didn't go after Hillary though. They had a press conference where they acknowledged what she did and said "no thanks" unless I'm misremembering which is entirely possible.
Slick got the same treatment as Trump if he didn't do them to influence an election. Trump in his infinite incompetence held discussions about how they could wait till after the election to deal with these stories. Of course, no serious person would compare Ken Starr to Mueller. Kenny boy did all he could to bring charges against Slick. One could argue Slick got it worse than Donald.If you think Slick willy was handled the same way, come see my bridge. Those were slaps on the wrist that were wrapped up neat and tidy behind closed doors. Taking away his license to practice law is laughable given he hadn't practiced in a while.
I guess this went right over your head. I guess I should also use the word “Humorous” of “NoT Real” so you don’t get triggered. lolJfc y’all can’t even laugh at stupid comedy. Holy shit. Y’all are some seriously dumb people if you actually thought that was a serious tweet. This is seriously perplexing. You can’t laugh at Cheeto and ketchup fingerprints. A corner of the paper were eaten off. Lol. Kind of concerning actually. Maybe you are not dumb and you just can’t handle people making fun of your cult of personality? Maybe you really do have such a thin veneer than any humor is lost on you. Blame me. That’s fine. Don’t bother me. Haha.
But to help y’all salty bitches a bit I’ll make sure I post the word “Humorous” of “NoT Real” so you don’t get triggered.
So exciting to see his fingerprints. I don’t think I’ll be able to sleep tonight.
Wait! What? Those weren't real either? lolStop posting fake pictures dude.
Doesn’t feel good does it. Haha 😂Wait! What? Those weren't real either? lol
I don’t know why they are behaving this way. I mean the people directly under Trump who took part in this conspiracy have already been convicted and done time for the same crimes and agreed to cooperate. The other party to the conspiracy signed a non-prosecution agreement to not do time. Makes no sense.
You keep going back to Trump and those who were under him being found guilty. Who questioned that? Can you show me where I or anyone else said he was innocent or shouldn't be punished if found guilty? Pointing out that there have been questions raised about how strong a case Bragg has isn't supporting Trump. Believing this is politically motivated isn't supporting Trump.You're being awfully defensive. I just answered your question.
FYI, those kinds of unwarranted and unnecessary comments comes across as the opposite.
Maybe schooling is actually in your future...?
I knew they weren't. That's why I said what I did. Wooosh!Doesn’t feel good does it. Haha 😂
Bro you just arnt picking up what Im alying down. I knew they were fake. I know that you know that they were fake. What I dont know is if you know that I know that these are fake.I knew they weren't. That's why I said what I did. Wooosh!
But we know that you didn't know that previous fakes were fake...before you knew that we knew they weren't fake and you didn't know they were fake?Bro you just arnt picking up what Im alying down. I knew they were fake. I know that you know that they were fake. What I dont know is if you know that I know that these are fake.
See if everyone could just take me as a dude having a bit of fun instead of some hothead with an agenda this will all go a lot more smoothly.But we know that you didn't know that previous fakes were fake...before you knew that we knew they weren't fake and you didn't know they were fake?
So we’re all agreed…. troll it is!See if everyone could just take me as a dude having a bit of fun instead of some hothead with an agenda this will all go a lot more smoothly.
Not sure I'd be quoting Avenatti. But he is being charged with crimes that people have already done time for and they did these crimes at his direction and for his benefit. IDK That seems important. In any event this is going to be very slow to move forward. His first in person hearing isnt until December.Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:
"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg
"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times
"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost
"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times
"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox
"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
C'mon man! Will you stop crushing Cack's dreams? He's been sitting at his desk at home with a bottle of lotion watching CNN and MSNBC for six years waiting for it to finally happen and he's just tired of going to bed every night dry and frustrated. Leave him alone. Let him have this one last moment to believe in something beautiful.Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:
"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg
"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times
"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost
"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times
"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox
"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
December? Sheesh, but I'm sure it'll drag into the election cycle.Not sure I'd be quoting Avenatti. But he is being charged with crimes that people have already done time for and they did these crimes at his direction and for his benefit. IDK That seems important. In any event this is going to be very slow to move forward. His first in person hearing isnt until December.
This is what I believe is called "grasping at straws"Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:
"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg
"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times
"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost
"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times
"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox
"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
He will get indicated in Ga and by Jack Smith before this. HahaDecember? Sheesh, but I'm sure it'll drag into the election cycle.
GEORGIA...He will get indicated in Ga and by Jack Smith before this. Haha