Trump Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Cack got caught posting fake stuff so many times he’s now intentionally posting fake stuff so he can say it’s all in fun.
Jfc y’all can’t even laugh at stupid comedy. Holy shit. Y’all are some seriously dumb people if you actually thought that was a serious tweet. This is seriously perplexing. You can’t laugh at Cheeto and ketchup fingerprints. A corner of the paper were eaten off. Lol. Kind of concerning actually. Maybe you are not dumb and you just can’t handle people making fun of your cult of personality? Maybe you really do have such a thin veneer than any humor is lost on you. Blame me. That’s fine. Don’t bother me. Haha.

But to help y’all salty bitches a bit I’ll make sure I post the word “Humorous” of “NoT Real” so you don’t get triggered.
 
Last edited:

chisea03

Active member
Messages
368
Reaction score
157
No one is arguing the dynamics of the two. Taking away his law license was like telling him he can't eat anymore at a restaurant he hadn't dined at in the last 20 years.

For those of you who think I or anyone else is defending Trump, better go back to school for reading comprehension. What's been pointed out is 1) How this is being handled; 2) That it's political; 3) The indictments were written in such a manner that this may not hold water; 4) "This is it baby, Trump is going away" rhetoric which hasn't happened after so many claims before.

I've made it clear before that I liked what happened (economy, policy, etc.) while he was POTUS. I also made it clear that I was not a fan of how he conducted himself. I have said numerous times as others who you think are defending Trump, that I hope he goes away. Once again for the record, I didn't vote for Trump in either election.
You're being awfully defensive. I just answered your question.
FYI, those kinds of unwarranted and unnecessary comments comes across as the opposite.

Maybe schooling is actually in your future...?
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
You're being awfully defensive. I just answered your question.
FYI, those kinds of unwarranted and unnecessary comments comes across as the opposite.

Maybe schooling is actually in your future...?
I don’t know why they are behaving this way. I mean the people directly under Trump who took part in this conspiracy have already been convicted and done time for the same crimes and agreed to cooperate. The other party to the conspiracy signed a non-prosecution agreement to not do time. Makes no sense.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,008
Clinton wasn't a self centered idiot, he made a deal which included him giving up his law license
A symbolic gesture? Lol. Clinton is the definition of a self-centered idiot and the actions in question sorta prove that.
 

chisea03

Active member
Messages
368
Reaction score
157
I don’t know why they are behaving this way. I mean the people directly under Trump who took part in this conspiracy have already been convicted and done time for the same crimes and agreed to cooperate. The other party to the conspiracy signed a non-prosecution agreement to not do time. Makes no sense.
I’m not into drama but I’d suspect that they follow his words, and believe his ever changing lies because they share a major trait… like trump, they also have small hands !!!
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,367
Reaction score
5,716
Uh, c'mon man, have you seen the, uh, the, umm, uh, you know man, the uh, the, the thing in the White House right now?
Objectively - Biden is nowhere close to the level of corruption that Trump has enjoyed. Subjectively - Biden is not as stupid as Trump IMO.
They didn't go after Hillary though. They had a press conference where they acknowledged what she did and said "no thanks" unless I'm misremembering which is entirely possible.
Hillary did go through an FBI investigation, and the DOJ under DJT did investigate her as well.
If you think Slick willy was handled the same way, come see my bridge. Those were slaps on the wrist that were wrapped up neat and tidy behind closed doors. Taking away his license to practice law is laughable given he hadn't practiced in a while.
Slick got the same treatment as Trump if he didn't do them to influence an election. Trump in his infinite incompetence held discussions about how they could wait till after the election to deal with these stories. Of course, no serious person would compare Ken Starr to Mueller. Kenny boy did all he could to bring charges against Slick. One could argue Slick got it worse than Donald.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,082
Jfc y’all can’t even laugh at stupid comedy. Holy shit. Y’all are some seriously dumb people if you actually thought that was a serious tweet. This is seriously perplexing. You can’t laugh at Cheeto and ketchup fingerprints. A corner of the paper were eaten off. Lol. Kind of concerning actually. Maybe you are not dumb and you just can’t handle people making fun of your cult of personality? Maybe you really do have such a thin veneer than any humor is lost on you. Blame me. That’s fine. Don’t bother me. Haha.

But to help y’all salty bitches a bit I’ll make sure I post the word “Humorous” of “NoT Real” so you don’t get triggered.
I guess this went right over your head. I guess I should also use the word “Humorous” of “NoT Real” so you don’t get triggered. lol
So exciting to see his fingerprints. I don’t think I’ll be able to sleep tonight.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,605
Reaction score
20,082
I don’t know why they are behaving this way. I mean the people directly under Trump who took part in this conspiracy have already been convicted and done time for the same crimes and agreed to cooperate. The other party to the conspiracy signed a non-prosecution agreement to not do time. Makes no sense.
You're being awfully defensive. I just answered your question.
FYI, those kinds of unwarranted and unnecessary comments comes across as the opposite.

Maybe schooling is actually in your future...?
You keep going back to Trump and those who were under him being found guilty. Who questioned that? Can you show me where I or anyone else said he was innocent or shouldn't be punished if found guilty? Pointing out that there have been questions raised about how strong a case Bragg has isn't supporting Trump. Believing this is politically motivated isn't supporting Trump.

Take the emotion out of it and don't read between the lines. There's nothing there.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,401
Bro you just arnt picking up what Im alying down. I knew they were fake. I know that you know that they were fake. What I dont know is if you know that I know that these are fake.
But we know that you didn't know that previous fakes were fake...before you knew that we knew they weren't fake and you didn't know they were fake?
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
But we know that you didn't know that previous fakes were fake...before you knew that we knew they weren't fake and you didn't know they were fake?
See if everyone could just take me as a dude having a bit of fun instead of some hothead with an agenda this will all go a lot more smoothly.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,401
Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:

"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg

"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times

"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost

"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times

"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox

"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:

"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg

"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times

"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost

"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times

"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox

"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
Not sure I'd be quoting Avenatti. But he is being charged with crimes that people have already done time for and they did these crimes at his direction and for his benefit. IDK That seems important. In any event this is going to be very slow to move forward. His first in person hearing isnt until December.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:

"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg

"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times

"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost

"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times

"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox

"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
C'mon man! Will you stop crushing Cack's dreams? He's been sitting at his desk at home with a bottle of lotion watching CNN and MSNBC for six years waiting for it to finally happen and he's just tired of going to bed every night dry and frustrated. Leave him alone. Let him have this one last moment to believe in something beautiful.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,401
Not sure I'd be quoting Avenatti. But he is being charged with crimes that people have already done time for and they did these crimes at his direction and for his benefit. IDK That seems important. In any event this is going to be very slow to move forward. His first in person hearing isnt until December.
December? Sheesh, but I'm sure it'll drag into the election cycle.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,008
It could be resolved before December I think. His lawyers will try to get charges dropped in meantime. Ted Cruz went into it a bit on his podcast. Love or hate the guy, he's pretty good at explaining legal things in plain english.
 

PolishDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,472
Reaction score
2,337
Some skepticism that Bragg can land the plane among liberal media and anti-Trump proponents:

"Legally weak." — Noah Feldman, Bloomberg

"These are hard charges to get excited about." — Michelle Goldberg, New York Times

"There are novel elements to this case that could complicate Bragg's legal pathway to a conviction while arming Trump and his allies with talking points about a supposedly overreaching prosecutor." — HuffPost

"[Bragg is] plunging forward with a premise that has given pause to even some of Mr. Trump's toughest critics." — Charles Savage, New York Times

"Dubious legal theory … painfully anticlimactic … It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him." — Ian Millhiser, Vox

"You can't build a case on the testimony of [former Trump attorney Michael] Cohen and [porn star Stormy] Daniels." — Michael Avenatti
This is what I believe is called "grasping at straws"
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
I like this guys channel. He sums it up really well and mentions the potential issues the case has with proceeding. Good stuff imo


Follow up after indictment
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top