A LOT of the "clean Wehrmacht" myths are little more than surviving Germans conveniently finding a suitable home for their BS within Cold War propaganda. The Allies needed Germany to bounce back quickly and it was convenient for Allied PR to build up German generals as super human figures because the Allies won. Not a whole lot different than hoping the team you beat in September finishes 11-1...it just makes you look all that better. Plus the former Nazis were now our friends and it was reallllly the Communists and Socialists who are the baddies!!
Also not a whole lot different than when the earliest Christians needed to convert Romans and couldn't pin the Roman Empire with killing Jesus, so they conveniently ignore hoe Pontius Pilate was a brutal governor who showed up to Jerusalem annually on the Passover (read: Jewish 4th of July) and cruxified anyone who didn't bend to Rome's authority....and conveniently put in the Bible that Pilate washed his hands and it was really the Jews who killed Jesus lol History is fun like that I guess...
Anyway Rommel is an enormous POS whose own vanity and self-interests made him worship Hitler's charisma/persona. Given that Hitler is himself among the biggest pieces of shit in human history, Rommel deserves no mercy. I mean people don't even really get just how bad Hitler was. Forget the Jews for a moment, Hitler and the Nazis wanted to kill every man, woman and child in ALL OF EASTERN EUROPE. They hadn't even really got started. The Final Solution was a last ditch effort to exterminate the Jews while they could--but they were going to exterminate everyone from the Black Sea to Leningrad. And they wrote it down in their fucking book and Nazis were somewhat aware....
In short, fuck Rommel and all of the Nazi leadership.
George Washington owned slaves that he could not legally free, big big difference. Washington was not a fan of slavery and thought it was expensive and inefficient. It's the big reason he never had liquidity to live as the rich guy that he was on paper.
His wife owned a minority share of her slaves since they were of her family's estate. His slaves had intermarried with hers. He didn't see freeing them while their spouses were still enslaved as a viable solution. So he spent more time in his will than any other topic discussing their future, instructing how the slaves were to be emancipated when Martha died, how they were to be funded and taught how to read, write, and learn a trade, etc.
Martha didn't share those views and the slaves she did own outright she gave to her grandson.
If you're going to pin a founding father with slavery, use Jefferson. Much easier target.
You missed 99% of the post.
The crux of it is Lee gets held to a standard few others are held to.
I dont know how "clean" the Wehrmacht was... or wasn't. I know for a fact, because it's literally documented, that millions of krauts weren't Nazis. It then stands to reason that a large number of the young men who served were also not Nazis.
Literally could not care less about 99% of a good general's personal views because I wasn't there at that time. I dont have the slightest clue what I would do.
North Dakota could declare itself a free country tomorrow and whether or not I agreed politically we should be free, I'd be in the first wave storming the AFB's we have here.
Love you trying to whitewash Washington. Its cute. Making excuses for him lol. You can avoid all the cringeworthy nonsense and just say "they didn't have the same values we do today."
Its literally that simple. Look how you twist shit to protect a Founding Father, it's borderline embarrassing. If Robert E. Lee is bad, so is every founding father who was tolerant of slavery. This shit is easy.
I personally don't think less of any of them. It was a barbaric practice, genuinely awful, but rhats how the world sold at the time.
People love taking a high horse when they have the benefit or foresight. In all likelihood, you and the VAST majority of this board would have been signing up to fight for your state if you were alive and in the South in the 1860's...or for Germany in the 1930's/40's.
You are a joke. You seem insecure at the idea that you would have defended a bad opinion or advanced a objectively bad worldview lol. Everyone wants to think of themselves as the guy who would've done the "right thing".....yet when these situations manifest themselves......well...lol you generally will be one of those guys believing in the "final victory"for Germany or freedom for the Confederate states.
Candy ass and arrogant way of viewing the world that came before you. Really... it must be great to believe your shit doesn't stink and you have no views that future generations won't frown upon. I'd be jealous but...I prefer taking a realistic view of the world