rtrn2glory
Well-known member
- Messages
- 16,169
- Reaction score
- 6,450
When did the last two work with Rees?
When did the last two work with Rees?
Refresh my memory, but how many guys did Saban go to first before Tommy?
Possibly 4 others over TR. What's your point? Saban sees a lot in TR to even have him on his list and that says a ton. He's a top 20 OC for sure. He just wasn't ever going to be viewed that way at ND because of his hire being lazy, nepotism, blah blah blah. Yet here we are with Parker as our new OC. Yipee.Refresh my memory, but how many guys did Saban go to first before Tommy?
Didn't have one. Asked a question.Possibly 4 others over TR. What's your point? Saban sees a lot in TR to even have him on his list and that says a ton. He's a top 20 OC for sure. He just wasn't ever going to be viewed that way at ND because of his hire being lazy, nepotism, blah blah blah. Yet here we are with Parker as our new OC. Yipee.
Yeah. They’re not afraid to add as many analysts as needed to succeed.Alabama has now hired three of Rees’ old co workers.
McNulty, Whisenhunt and John Aylward
Sure seems Saban possesses ample respect for Rees, as he’s allowed him to surround himself with his guys.
No clue if it's true, but I've seen posts that schools like Bama and UGA have over 30 analysts. I wonder how many ND has.Yeah. They’re not afraid to add as many analysts as needed to succeed.
There are militias in the upper Midwest that don't have 30 members.No clue if it's true, but I've seen posts that schools like Bama and UGA have over 30 analysts. I wonder how many ND has.
Another nepotism hire! Yea!Possibly 4 others over TR. What's your point? Saban sees a lot in TR to even have him on his list and that says a ton. He's a top 20 OC for sure. He just wasn't ever going to be viewed that way at ND because of his hire being lazy, nepotism, blah blah blah. Yet here we are with Parker as our new OC. Yipee.
Kinda crazy to think 10 years ago he was suiting up for the Irish and playing against Alabama, and now he's one of their highest paid coaches after Saban.
The coordinator positions at Alabama are a revolving door — which is truly remarkable given their consistent level of elite success.
Something tells me Rees won’t be there too long, though, and it it won’t be due to Rees being promoted / leaving for a head coaching position somewhere. I just don’t see it working out too well there. However, Golding lasted longer than I (or 9/10 Alabama fans) wanted and expected.
How much of the play calling responsibilities were on Rees? I was under the impression that Kelly either predominately called the plays or considerably inhibited Rees’ play calling. Even without Kelly, last year’s offense was … well … insignificant. Sure, the quarterback room was pedestrian, but he was working with an elite offensive line, an impressive tight end, and a stable of quality running backs.Rees has gotten to the playoffs before with far, far less. Why would he struggle with the best talent available and a stout defense on the other side of the ball? Alabama coordinators are setup for success, not failure.
How much of the play calling responsibilities were on Rees? I was under the impression that Kelly either predominately called the plays or considerably inhibited Rees’ play calling. Even without Kelly, last year’s offense was … well … insignificant. Sure, the quarterback room was pedestrian, but he was working with an elite offensive line, an impressive tight end, and a stable of quality running backs.
Wasn’t Locksley before Sark and the first one that started putting up big numbers as OC with Tua?I think the biggest problem for Tommy at Alabama is going to be living up to the standard and expectations set by Kiffin and Sark. O'Brien wasn't a bad OC, he just wasn't great. After several years of Sark & Kiffin going wild and putting up ridiculous numbers sometimes, anything less seemed pedestrian and unacceptable. I don't think Tommy has to be the next 2020 Sark, but he definitely needs to show he's an improvement over O'Brien. If he does that, he'll be a hero in Tuscaloosa, especially if he helps us win a championship.
It was also a young offense, and young players make mistakes. Estime had fumble problems early in the season. Merriweather struggled with the playbook early and didn't see much time as a result. Big Fish had a bit of a Sophomore slump in the early part of the season. Buchner certainly had his struggles even when he was healthy. There's a lot of talent there, and yes teams can be successful with a few young starters, but it's hard to be incredibly successful when over half your starters are underclassmen and one is a backup QB with limitations.How much of the play calling responsibilities were on Rees? I was under the impression that Kelly either predominately called the plays or considerably inhibited Rees’ play calling. Even without Kelly, last year’s offense was … well … insignificant. Sure, the quarterback room was pedestrian, but he was working with an elite offensive line, an impressive tight end, and a stable of quality running backs.
Locksley did pretty well and was well-liked by the fans. Joey F gets a lot of love for bringing Saban and the Bama O into the modern era. He generally did a very good job running the offense. He had a few dumb moments that set Saban off, but overall, he was a whiz at dialing up plays. His exit just before the Natty was because of lack of focus and time. He had taken the FAU job and was trying to put together a staff, recruit, and etc., and it showed. He did a poor job in the semifinal game and Saban invited him to go ahead and move on, replacing him at OC for the game with Sark.Wasn’t Locksley before Sark and the first one that started putting up big numbers as OC with Tua?
I thought Joey Freshwater was merely “ok” as OC and even on a lower level than BoB.
Saban and others seemed to not mind him leaving, even a few days before the Natty.
Doesn't matter how much talent you surround a QB with if the QB isn't good. He's the straw that stirs the drink. NFL teams are loaded with the best talent, but struggle because of their QB. Tommy had some question marks, but last years problems were primarily with the QB.How much of the play calling responsibilities were on Rees? I was under the impression that Kelly either predominately called the plays or considerably inhibited Rees’ play calling. Even without Kelly, last year’s offense was … well … insignificant. Sure, the quarterback room was pedestrian, but he was working with an elite offensive line, an impressive tight end, and a stable of quality running backs.
You can still win (see mainly LSU under Les Miles), and Notre Dame did win 9 games, but I absolutely agree with you. Quarterback is undoubtedly the most important position, and Notre Dame didn’t have an adequate one last year. Buchner may turn out to be a pretty good quarterback, but it was evident that he needed more time. Sitting behind Sam Hartman, gaining meaningful reps with the WRs, learning the (new) playbook, and continuing to learn, study, and dissect defense may be just what he needs. Further, hopefully Notre Dame is able to really lay it on to some its lesser opponents (Navy, Tennessee State, Central Michigan, etc.) so that Buchner can receive meaningful snaps in the second half.Doesn't matter how much talent you surround a QB with if the QB isn't good. He's the straw that stirs the drink. NFL teams are loaded with the best talent, but struggle because of their QB. Tommy had some question marks, but last years problems were primarily with the QB.