The Optimal Notre Dame Scheduling Model

Notre Dame Joe

Active member
Messages
296
Reaction score
173
Thats odd. ASU is actually a very normal and good OOC P4 opponent to have on the schedule?
The Texas boys are screaming about their OOC last year. If UT had scheduled Kent State instead of @OSU they would have been right there with us in the 2-loss rugby scrum.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
2,963
This will continue to become a thing. I think the Alabama games and others will be canceled. This is the squeeze that we’re actually going to feel. The ACC makes our schedules suck, but we’re gonna have a tough time picking up out of conference games.
 

Me2SouthBend

Well-known member
Messages
2,634
Reaction score
3,196

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
A by product of this would be a good Navy team helping SOS for ND w another win before the committee makes selections. May be moot if playoff is expanded beyond 12 teams anyway.
Navy could be 11-1 with an average margin of victory of 35 points except we shut them out, and we would never get one iota of credit for beating them.
 

GowerND11

Well-known member
Messages
6,534
Reaction score
3,282
All these teams canceling ND games or other tough OOC games, just so their conference schedule can have 2 teams that are good because the conferences have 40 teams now.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
All these teams canceling ND games or other tough OOC games, just so their conference schedule can have 2 teams that are good because the conferences have 40 teams now.
It's bad for the sport and for the fans but I don't really blame the schools themselves. They're responding to a system that has become entirely about making the playoffs.
And - at least for premiere programs in the two biggest conferences - the downside risk of losing an OOC game probably exceeds the upside of winning one. Texas sure could have been in this year if they hadn't lost to Ohio State, and Bama wouldn't have been on the bubble if they hadn't lost to FSU. Why take those chances when you can tune up against tomato cans instead?
 

Huntr

24 Karat Shamrock
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
10,419
I don't really blame the schools themselves. They're responding to a system that has become entirely about making the playoffs.

What?!

The schools are the ones who did this!

The schools created the conferences and NCAA.

The schools made the conferences huge and untenable.

The schools chased the tv money from CCGs and expanded playoffs.

The schools fucked the SA's since the inception of college football.

Not blaming the schools who are responsible for every aspect this monster is crazy.

To be honest, it speaks to the phenomenal communication job they've done in convincing fans that all this shit just...happened.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
What?!

The schools are the ones who did this!

The schools created the conferences and NCAA.

The schools made the conferences huge and untenable.

The schools chased the tv money from CCGs and expanded playoffs.

The schools fucked the SA's since the inception of college football.

Not blaming the schools who are responsible for every aspect this monster is crazy.

To be honest, it speaks to the phenomenal communication job they've done in convincing fans that all this shit just...happened.
Sure, the schools are the conferences and the conferences are the schools, and together they created the system that got us here. I'm aware.

I guess what I mean is I don't necessarily blame the current athletic directors and coaches at places like Bama and Texas, who are paid a whole lot of money to do one very specific thing (make the playoffs and then advance as far as possible), and will be quickly replaced if they do not succeed at that. Dropping games like us is a totally logical response to what they've seen unfold over the last couple of seasons.

It's a little different in USC's case because of the history and because the Notre Dame game means more to many of their fans than their actual conference games do. But for a Bama or Texas, playing us in September is just a fun appetizer for the season that actually matters, and I can see why they might decide it's not worth the risk of losing and replace us with North Texas or whoever. The fact that it screws us and offers a less-appealing product to their fans are secondary concerns.
 
Last edited:

Notre Dame Joe

Active member
Messages
296
Reaction score
173
All these teams canceling ND games or other tough OOC games, just so their conference schedule can have 2 teams that are good because the conferences have 40 teams now.
And a bloated conference makes it somewhat easier to get a lot of teams to 10-2+.

Examples. Bama played 3 ranked (at the end) teams in conference play (2-1). A&M played one (0-1).
 
Top