There were a lot of claims and suppositions in that article- very little hard proof tying the alleged terrorist to the Iranian regime. Very thin gruel if we're looking for another war...
Iran has a long running policy of undercutting US policy in the Middle East, sometimes using guerilla tactics that can be described as terrorism. It does not have a record of picking direct fights with the US- it's very hard for me to believe that someone with any authority in the Iranian regime made the calculation that assassinating a Saudi ambassador on US soil would be worth the cost. I would expect a much greater level of proof before words like war even enter the conversation.
...don't disagree...response is always prefaced with "presuming it is true"...even if I didn't say it.
Holder sounds lined up to hang it on Iran...I don't like Holder at all, nor BO...but I refuse to believe they would in any way manufacture, distort, stretch anything associated with information that is, in effect, an act of war...I mean these guys have skewered W, and never gave him room for bad intel...just no way they go there themselves.
For Holder to even allude to Iran...I believe there is fire there my friend.