Was Elston key in landing any of our recruits, or was he one of the coaches that needs to do more? Outside of Alford and Booker, I'm not too familiar with how our individual coaches do on the trail.
His biggest recruiting accomplishment to date is getting ND to finish a distant second/third to USC and Oregon for Juju Smith.
He flipped Barajas from PSU and 247 ranked him as the #19th best recruiter in the nation.
So there's that...
His biggest recruiting accomplishment to date is getting ND to finish a distant second/third to USC and Oregon for Juju Smith.
Barajas flipped himself.
The podcast pointed out that when Barajas committed to PSU, ND (apparently Eslton) stopped talking to him completeley, which was a major mistake. Thankfully he fell into our lap because he liked ND and wanted to be closer to home.
He was also the lead recruiter for Jaylon Smith. Not to mention Brandon Tiassum, Dew-Treadway and Justin Yoon.
It is what it is, Koon. He does what is asked of him from Kelly and nothing more. Not every coach on our staff can be Tosh. The other side of the coin is that his actual coaching performance has been pretty solid.
He'll be the "lead recruiter" for pretty much every local guy... word is, he does practically no recruiting on them. Which is part of the reason Tiassum even got an offer because he was too lazy to put in effort for higher rated prospects when there was a guy who actively wanted to jump on board. IMO, DL class is pretty atrocious this year (unless Tillery pans out).
The fact remains that he is a good coach. He got the guys that he was asked to get and that is what Kelly wanted from him. There are guys like that on every staff in the country. Their expectation is to be a good coach and not eff up on the low hanging fruit of recruiting. Elston has done exactly that.
I just get frustrated with the black/white-instant gratification crowd that Koon is representing where every coach needs to recruit like Tosh and coach like Saban or they are complete shit. That's not reality and shouldn't be the expectation.
The fact remains that he is a good coach. He got the guys that he was asked to get and that is what Kelly wanted from him. There are guys like that on every staff in the country. Their expectation is to be a good coach and not eff up on the low hanging fruit of recruiting. Elston has done exactly that.
I just get frustrated with the black/white-instant gratification crowd that Koon is representing where every coach needs to recruit like Tosh and coach like Saban or they are complete shit. That's not reality and shouldn't be the expectation.
I just have a hard time when guys like Mike Frank (who's closer than anyone on here to the program) call out their work ethic and commitment.
Skill is one thing, want-to is another and I hate when the latter is lacking in almost any role.
I just have a hard time when guys like Mike Frank (who's closer than anyone on here to the program) call out their work ethic and commitment.
Skill is one thing, want-to is another and I hate when the latter is lacking in almost any role.
“Mike Elston is always good for a couple big recruiting wins a year,” Wiltfong said. “He’s done some (good things) against some formidable foes.”
I'm pretty sure your nature will attract you to anything sensationalist. You listen to one snip from Mike Frank and now suddenly you think Elston is the worst thing since fig pudding. The reality is that your expectation for every coach is unrealistic. Elston is a good "on the field" coach who recruits to the level that BK asks of him. Frank is out of his element on this topic, imo. Which is a strong statement from me considering I like Mike Frank.
Here is what Wiltfong said about Elston back in June:
If you think that every coach on our staff is going to recruit like Tosh, then you need to look at the staffs of previous years. Elston would have been the best recruiter on Ty Willingham's staff, and that is a fact. On this staff, his recruiting efforts are an afterthought because that is all that is asked of him. BK hired him for his coaching abilities, not his recruiting abilities.
This is what upsets me about the whole thing. People in the real world get fired for their lack of effort. If ND can find someone better to recruit in our area then sign him up IMO, we should be getting all of the local talent and EVERY recruit in state!
My nature? And on Mike Frank, who has a closer view of the program than him? And he tries to not be overly negative and he says that, but he's essentially slamming the efforts of the staff outside of Booker and Alford.
I don't expect every coach to recruit like Alford... But there's a big difference in being Alford and being called out by ISD, who has a $ interest in maintaining a relationship with the current staff. That's a pretty big statement when they need to staff's trust as part of their business. IMO.
Yes... your nature. When have you ever not been the first person to jump on a sensationalist topic? (Fire Longo?)
It's your nature to put too much stock into one Power Hour and suddenly want to make broad generalizations about a man's work ethic and character. You don't think laterally about topics like these. You always hear a piece of information, make immediate judgement and then start puking opinion all over the board.
Ok, lets step back because I'm assuming Mike Frank knows everything about the current program.
Does he really know what he's talking about? I know nothing about him other than he runs ISD.
How in the hell does Mike Frank know what kind of effort goes into Elston's role?
Just because in his mind he isn't putting effort on a kid he likes suddenly means that he is just sitting at home watching tv?
Not every coach on a staff is expected to be a crack recruiter. They are required to be a good coach.
Elston does that, and Mike Frank is attacking his character by acting like they are mutually inclusive. They are not.
Ok, lets step back because I'm assuming Mike Frank knows everything about the current program.
Does he really know what he's talking about? I know nothing about him other than he runs ISD.
Instead of looking at who Elston was able to snag, who did Elston miss out on? Who was a realistic option for Elston and he completely dropped the ball? As for coaching, I think you could do worse but I certainly think you could do better.
Personally, I think its high time BK gives Tony Alford a Co-OC designation. I think he's earned the title. I'm not sure why Quinn is name people clamor for though. Its an honest question and not troll material. How much of it was Quinn and how much of it was Kelly, if that makes sense.
I would really prefer to find a true defensive coach should Elston leave instead of plugging the hole just so Jeff Quinn can come on board. Sure, Booker was a defensive coach prior to ND but he was a DB coach so not sure how that translates to the DL in terms of coaching. If you want better DL play, get a DL coach.
Y'all are crazy. I gotta get back to work. But I hope those of you that are so quick to attack a man's character (work ethic is one of the pillars of character, imo) without knowing him or the expectations he has been given, one day get that same treatment.
For instant, it's 10am on a Tuesday. One could say that all of you posting today are lazy and bad workers. After all, shouldn't you be at work right now? See... the whole story isn't something that is black & white, and some of you should consider that when attacking a man's character.
You're getting too philisophical. We're not attacking his character, I'm sure he's a good guy. If you'll accept the idea that he's not working hard (listen to the podcast if you have time) on the recruiting trail, that's an issue and is not a direct indictment of his character. Maybe he's not good at it? Maybe he doesn't realize how important it is? Maybe he's spending too much time watching film? Or maybe he is lazy? Whatever it is, it isn't good enough in Mike Frank's opinion (this is about the staff as a whole, not just Elston).
But the Barajas story on Elston is pretty bad.
Yep... always black and white with you.