C
Cackalacky
Guest
Am I closer?
Wouldn't be refreshing for Dem memes to be funny instead of just bitter?
That statement ignores the rather significant role the US has had in terms of creating the chaos that is modern day Mexico.
The role of the US as it relates to Mexico now can be debated. Doesn't mean it's legal or justified to drop off thousands of people across the border and say,"here take care of them."
with that philosophy I can't wait to go to the UK, demand reparations for what they did to ky Irish amcestors, then sign up for free housing, education, and health care. Sounds like a deal!
So, none of that stuff is relevant to the US Mexico relationship or a discussion about it. The US has consistently worked to destabilize the Mexican economy as well as the governmental institutions in Mexico vis a vis drug consumption and or the war on drugs as well as through direct military intervention and economic strong arming. Now then, why is anyone surprised when Mexicans then wish to come to the US legal or otherwise? If you want to be angry about the current situation the US government and those policies should be at least one focus of said anger and a part of the discussion in terms of what needs to change. Frankly, repelling NAFTA and or requiring Mexico to honor it's own environmental and labor laws in order for goods or services produced there to have access to the US market would be a good place to start. Considering how destabilized Mexico is I would think these kids could have as good of an argument for amnesty as the average Cuban. Don't you?
1) You ignored everything I said.
2) Mexico sucks for a lot of reasons. The US and NAFTA fall in around numbers 223 amd 224 on that list. We still have NO responsibility for THEIR citizens and visa versa
3) Everyone has the right to come here legally. No one is entitled to amnesty. If you disagree open the Constitution and show me where I'm wrong. And I don't care if they're from Denmark or Honduras. Illegal is illegal.
1. What you said was completely off topic and a bait and switch.
2. Actually NAFTA is pretty much #1 or 2 on that list. That policy destroyed the agrarian economy of Mexico(particularly corn) and displaced millions of Mexicans. Not surprisingly illegal immigration to the US explodes, the Mexican family and social structure in many places falls apart, an open and ongoing armed rebellion erupts in the form of the Zapatista's and narco trafficking explodes. So again I would say NAFTA is either 1 or 2 in terms of what has shaped present day Mexico (the IMF induced debt crisis of the 80's being the other) and it is that turd of a trade agreement (which has clauses stipulating that each country needs to enforce environmental and labor laws to be a party to it) that is at the core of Mexico's problems. As a party to that agreement the US does indeed bare some responsibility in the same way consumers who purchase illegal drugs do to supporting the Mexican drug cartels or people who buy clothes produced by sweatshop labor.
3. I already provided you with an example of making a case for granting amnesty as political refugees. Not saying it should be done but I would argue that there is as strong a case for grating it to these kids as there is to a Cuban who just happens to make it to Miami sans a Visa. So the argument then becomes should these kids be granted amnesty? If not why, given there is already a precedent for doing it for an entire group of people, Cubans.
Give me you tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breath free ...
This is what America is ... one of the things that makes it strong and vibrant. Embrace the nation's history on immigration. We should not abandon our principles by turning inward.