We are the only top team with a known quality entity at QB next year.
the Clemson QB will be better than the ND QB, that is known.
gonna be a big test for Bama next year. They have zero of their best athletic studs coming back. Lot of potential and Saban is the talent-whisperer, but he's never had to whisper as much as he'll have to next year.
gonna be a big test for Bama next year. They have zero of their best athletic studs coming back. Lot of potential and Saban is the talent-whisperer, but he's never had to whisper as much as he'll have to next year.
gonna be a big test for Bama next year. They have zero of their best athletic studs coming back. Lot of potential and Saban is the talent-whisperer, but he's never had to whisper as much as he'll have to next year.
I think they will be ok. Better than us.
I think it'll be the 1st year in a long time where if we have the better QB, we'll be the better team. Now, Bryce Young probably will be better than Coan. But, at least its also the first year in a long time where we don't KNOW before the season even starts that their QB is better.
I was fully onboard with ND was better than OSU entering the playoffs and would have preferred to play them. Until they absolutely embarrassed Clemson.
ND I believe is a regular top10 program now. But the top 3 are basically untouchable for the rest of the group.
BTW it's amazing how cfb has changed since we got spanked by Bama in 12. From ball control and stud defense to air raid and manageable defense.
Did people rate Mac Jones at the start of the year?
I knew nothing about him.
He played well coming in for Tua. And he's a Senior. Young could be great. But, over the past 10 years, more than half of the 5-star 1st year Frosh/Soph QBs have crapped the bed mentally/emotionally.
I agree with this.
I bet if Young is not great Saban just goes back to what he knows with that big RB Robinson and whoever else they have and they dominate against everyone that way again.
I think it'll be the 1st year in a long time where if we have the better QB, we'll be the better team. Now, Bryce Young probably will be better than Coan. But, at least its also the first year in a long time where we don't KNOW before the season even starts that their QB is better.
Oh wow! Are you guys really comparing ND to OSU?
What part in NDs recruiting the last ten years would make you think ND is on par with the likes of Bama, Clemson, or OSU? Do you believe that all of a sudden all of NDs 3 and 4 stars are going to divinely morph into 5 stars like those three teams have?
Ive read the Bible many times and I dont recall God coming to earth in flesh to save ND football, then or now.
ND is a great university. It is a good football team. It wins more than most programs.
It isnt a great football team. It loses against the great programs 95% of the time like all other teams do.
Just blows my mind that people expect ND to be on par with the elite teams when they arent anywhere similar in academic sense...you know, what universities are actually supposed to be about?
Love your team for what they are, not what they are not. If you want to love for NCs, cheer on another team.
I find it interesting how suddenly people who (justifiably) anticipated that OSU would get crushed by Clemson are now thinking that they are on the same level as Clemson and Alabama. 4 of those touchdown passes, if replayed 10 times, would have been intercepted or incomplete 8-9 times. Additionally, Clemson's D (and rush d in particular) was crippled with Turner out the 1st half and Davis and Skalski out the 2nd, as well as three other starters out for most of the game. Ohio State was playing a skeleton crew and got lucky. On the flipside, Clemson lost their playcaller in GAME WEEK!
Playing 10 games w/ everyone healthy, Alabama and Clemson are a wash and Notre Dame beats OSU 6 or 7 out of 10 times. Clemson and Bama beat OSU 8-9 times out of 10.
Alabama may have beaten us by less than OSU beat Clemson, but nothing they did was lucky. None of their passes could have easily gone the other way. Likewise when we beat Clemson the 1st time (aside from that McKinley catch) and when Clemson beat us. OSU's tight ends didn't have separation on 2 of those TDs. They got lucky. One cover man was in front of the TE and just wiffed on the INT and Fields threw into double coverage on the other and got away with it. OSUs WRs didn't have separation on the 2 bomb TDs. It was a coin flip both times.
This shows us: 1), even when you are outclassed, you can still win and win big if you at least put yourself in a position to get lucky. Had Clemson intercepted those 4 passes (not to mention 2-3 other bombs that had very little or no separation), which just as easily could have happened, OSU loses by 40+. But had OSU played it safe, they lose by 20 every time. So, OSU had to take the chance regardless and it worked out for them this time. Maybe it'll work out again against Bama. But the fact is that, unless they throw up 50/50 luck bombs, they would never beat either team assuming equal team health. 2). when Notre Dame or anyone else plays safe against a superior team, they literally have an almost 0% chance of winning.
Nostradamus is that you?! You were spot on.
Rep this man!
"I'd bet almost anything that unless OSU completes at least 3 50/50 balls of at least 40 yards and has 1 INT or less, they lose to Bama by 21+. Bama doesn't have to complete a single 50/50 ball to win."
Its good to not be Kool-Aid drinkers and expect more than we are capable of but just as bad to be perpetually negative. The truth is, we were clearly the #3 team in the country this year, in our own tier. We were a 1 lockdown corner, 1 gamebreaker WR and a QB willing and able to throw the long-ball away from being equal to fully healthy Clemson and Bama. Every other area we were their equal. OSU lacked on both lines, at LB, at safety and at tight end. A & M, Georgia and Florida would all beat OSU more than half the time.
Next year, with every top 10 team losing so much, we should be in the top tier at every position group other than CB (unless we can somehow pick up 1 stud in transfer portal), assuming Austin and Lenzy are healthy. Only Bama and Clemson will have as complete a team as we. We are the only top level team that can legitimately expect our OC to improve significantly and we shouldn't see a drop off at DC. Clemson stays the same and there is no way whoever Bama brings in will be as good as Sarkisian at OC. We are the only team who returns its best defensive player and who can expect that player to be better. We are the only top team to return its game-changing RB1 and likewise expect him to be even better. I would argue that Mayer will be the single most effective offensive weapon of any top team next year. Bama, Clemson, OSU, A & M, Florida, etc all lose their top weapons. And our schedule is the easiest we'll see for the next decade so our health should be better through the season than Bama or Clemson.
I don't agree with the bolded. OSU more than held their own at the line of scrimmage with Clemson.
I don't agree with the bolded. OSU more than held their own at the line of scrimmage with Clemson.
You mean Clemson's 2nd and 3rd string on OL and DL? Yeah, you're right.
But against Clemson's 1st string DL, had ANY of them been healthy for even a half, OSU OL would have performed the same way as they did against Northwestern and even Indiana, not to mention Bama...badly.
As for OSU's DL? Yep, they played pretty good against Clemson's mostly 2nd string OL.
But against Clemson's 1st string OL, had they been healthy and actually had a playcaller they had ever worked with before that day, which if you've played football is confusing as hell especially if you aren't even your normal unit...they would have been trucked...just like they were against Indiana and even Rutgers, not to mention Bama.
Geez, this reminds me of the guy who sucker punches a drunk boxer in a bar and then suddenly thinks they're as tough. Clemson is >>>>>>> OSU and ND is clearly > OSU. There's no way we'd ever win less than 6 out of every 10 from them this year. Not a chance.
The 2nd and 3rd string parts I don’t think is entirely accurate