NeuteredDoomer
RIP - You are missed
- Messages
- 6,714
- Reaction score
- 434
Hey I am not trying to BS anyone. I know that the true veer started with split backs I also know that it did start with it being a wider option. But it has eveolved some, and my high school did run an inside veer with I formation. It was based off the read on the dtackle(d-end in 3-4) for the give. While the hole was the 4 or 3 hole (between tackle and guard) the give itself was tight off the guard's butt. It seemed to me that Navy ran that instead of a traditional midline between guard and tackle.
PS. New to this how do I PM here?
Well, I taped the game. Did not see fullback veering that wide. Seemed right twixt C and G. But like I say, if you want to discuss, I'll check video and we can p.m. DLIne was vanilla (again, at a quck glance) and simply got spanked. I thought they could have used more interior slants, shifts, and crosses with backers. They were sitting ducks. Reaks of a coaching staff inexperienced with covering any form of option. I'll take veer and bone or double slot option over that crap spread anytime. Hate that backs run sideways to get a handoff then have look over and find a hole. That's just me. I hate the spread, although I know it works for so many. Just not ND this year.
Last edited: