I think your definition is correct but I doubt we will be making a new term to describe teams that have been good at football since the boomers made it to college or where "championships are the standard" or whatever phrases people want to say.
While I didn't think of myself as "arguing" with anybody, I wonder if you ever converse with CFB fans outside of this board. Try polling the people at r/CFB. Ninety percent will call Georgia a blueblood, and that same ninety percent would have called all three bluebloods before recent embarrassments to Clemson and Penn State. Of course, reddit skews young. If you're accustomed to conversing with older folks, you'll find different results.
What sticks out to me is your use of extremist phrases like "no one" and "every time." I do see graphs like this occasionally, but they're very rare unless the post itself centers on the question of who the bluebloods are. Meanwhile, the term chronically sneaks its way into casual conversation many times a day without this chart being posted.
Anti-ND bias to not include the Dickinson system
Freeman (external monologue): “Again, I have a lot of respect for any coach, but what (Franklin) has done for college football has been tremendous"
I would agree a large part of that was classy, but I wouldn't call pointless bullshit classy, and "what (Franklin) has done for college football has been tremendous" is pointless bullshit. I wouldn't even call it outrageous hyperbole, because that implies at least a tiny bit of truth.
Brother, have you ever gone back and read your posts? About 90% of your posts are contrarian takes and very pedantic. If pressed I think you would argue about if the sky is blue.
I agree with the 8 there. If I were looking for a slightly more liberal and expansive definition of the term "blue blood," at the very least it would have to include sustained success with more than one coach. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Paterno basically build PSU and they've never had any long term success outside of him. For that alone, even with a wider view of "blue blood" I wouldn't consider PSU.
You seem to have mastered the art of psychological projection.
Sparty would be funny. He would experience getting “little brothered” on a daily basis.
If I were him, I’d take one of those jobs for a dollar so PSU still has to pay me every dime.
Duke basketball doesn’t have enough history, does it?
"Everyone" makes perfect sense in the context of that old saying, though the saying doesn't remotely fit here. I've indeed insinuated that Bane at times acts like an asshole when chastising me unfairly, but I've certainly never said that "everyone" I meet is an asshole. Where would you even get an idea so completely divorced from reality? So yes, you could say your attempt to spin me in this manner is extremist at best.
It’s not just this thread. If you look through your posting history you’ll find several examples.
I thought about this if he picked a Cali team. Would the PSU money be taxed from Pennsylvania instead of Cali?
