Immigration

[BuaConstrictor]

It was answered correctly.

It absolutely was not. One does not need to be "from here" to be a citizen or LPR.

So..try again.

Thats not moving goalposts.

It is.

Frankly it should not even be limited to criminal charges.

So now criminal charges don't even matter. Convictions, charges, none of it matters.

If the administration thinks some 30 year old foreign doctoral student is a commie, send him back lol.

Oh, so now we are fine with "thought police".

 

[BuaConstrictor]

All crimes.

What would YOU personally enforce? What level of crimes?

 

[Blazers46]

I believe we are doing the Lords work and keeping Bua from doing something stupid out in the real world and providing a distraction for him so he doesn’t get out of his mom’s basement. The Bua Vortex is real.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

I believe we are doing the Lords work and keeping Bua from doing something stupid out in the real world and providing a distraction for him so he doesn’t get out of his mom’s basement. The Bua Vortex is real.

So no examples of Christ saying to eradicate people?

 

[NorthDakota]

It absolutely was not. One does not need to be "from here" to be a citizen or LPR.

So..try again.

It is.


So now criminal charges don't even matter. Convictions, charges, none of it matters.


Oh, so now we are fine with "thought police".

It was. Citizens are from here. Either through birth or by jumping through the hoops necessary after living here X amount of time. Didn't expect a lib to be so blood and soil about where people are from!

Correct. None of it really matters. Crimes (charged, convicted, otherwise) is probably the best trigger, but it's absurd to have a structure in place where the government has to let a foreigner live here.

I'm very fine with thought policing people who don't have a right to be here.

 

[NorthDakota]

What would YOU personally enforce? What level of crimes?

All crimes.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Citizens are from here.

No they are not. You can hold dual citizenship and just because you jump through hoops does not mean you are "from" a place originally.

There are people who are American citizens who not only aren't from here...but currently don't even live here.

Try again.

re: jumping through hoops, what if in the years long process of jumping through hoops they are randomly chosen to be deported? They are adhering to your standard..but still end up being kicked out. We've now established that crimes don't matter and it can be for anything....and on to....

m very fine with thought policing people who don't have a right to be here.

How do you determine that?

All crimes.

How would you determine that?

 

[BuaConstrictor]

 

[ColoradoIrish]

It was. Citizens are from here. Either through birth or by jumping through the hoops necessary after living here X amount of time. Didn't expect a lib to be so blood and soil about where people are from!

Correct. None of it really matters. Crimes (charged, convicted, otherwise) is probably the best trigger, but it's absurd to have a structure in place where the government has to let a foreigner live here.

I'm very fine with thought policing people who don't have a right to be here.

What about citizens that are born here but won't be able to prove it based on new requirements in the save act?

 

[NorthDakota]

No they are not. You can hold dual citizenship and just because you jump through hoops does not mean you are "from" a place originally.

There are people who are American citizens who not only aren't from here...but currently don't even live here.

Try again.

re: jumping through hoops, what if in the years long process of jumping through hoops they are randomly chosen to be deported? They are adhering to your standard..but still end up being kicked out. We've now established that crimes don't matter and it can be for anything....and on to....


How do you determine that?


How would you determine that?

As far as the law goes, if your parent is an American so are you. Ted Cruz is born in Canada. He's still from here for all intents and purposes.

Randomly chosen? I mean I'd like them to at least check a box as to why this person needs to leave. But should the United States be able to deport a person who isn't a citizen? Obviously.

 

[NorthDakota]

What about citizens that are born here but won't be able to prove it based on new requirements in the save act?

Who won't be able to prove they are citizens?

 

[BuaConstrictor]

As far as the law goes, if your parent is an American so are you

Incorrect! This directly excludes your group of "jumping through the hoops" folks.

" re: jumping through hoops(by jumping through the hoops necessary after living here X amount of time.) what if in the years long process of jumping through hoops they are randomly chosen to be deported? "

Randomly chosen? I mean I'd like them to at least check a box

What are the choices? Who determines them? What recourse, if any, does the person have? What is the process? How is it adjudicated?

 

[ColoradoIrish]

Who won't be able to prove they are citizens?

Anyone without birth certificate matching their current name or without a passport. Personally I have plenty of trans friends that fall into this category and are at risk of not being able eligible to vote if it passes into law

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Who won't be able to prove they are citizens?

Millions of Americans Don’t Have Documents Proving Their Citizenship Readily Available

Requiring Americans to prove their citizenship to register to vote would exclude millions of citizens from the political process.

www.brennancenter.org

 

[NorthDakota]

Incorrect! This directly excludes your group of "jumping through the hoops" folks.

" re: jumping through hoops, what if in the years long process of jumping through hoops they are randomly chosen to be deported? "


What are the choices? Who determines them? What recourse, if any, does the person have? What is the process? How is it adjudicated?

incorrect. You are trying here, I get it.

you want me to draft a federal form and a whole legal process on a message board. I am flattered. Bare minimum people should have an opportunity to show they are a citizen. I don't care whether that goes to immigration judges, federal district court, etc. If someone can allow they are a citizen, then they aren't going anywhere. I think there is a process to remove citizenship from naturalized people and deporting them, but I am unfamiliar with it.

 

[NorthDakota]

Millions of Americans Don’t Have Documents Proving Their Citizenship Readily Available

Requiring Americans to prove their citizenship to register to vote would exclude millions of citizens from the political process.

www.brennancenter.org

Lol did you read the article or did you just copy the link?

Fun fact, you don't need documents to prove things in court. It's cetainly helpful. But you can go to court and tell them what happened.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

incorrect.

I'm 100% correct. You even stipulated to it.

Either through birth or by jumping through the hoops necessary after living here X amount of time.

Your words. Not mine.

you want me to draft a federal form and a whole legal process

Did I say that? I'm asking you to layout your idea.

Bare minimum people should have an opportunity to show they are a citizen.

How would they go about doing that? How much time would be given?

I don't care whether that goes to immigration judges, federal district court, etc

So you agree with even non-citizens having due process?

Do you disagree with the Trump admin deporting people prior to having due process rights in court? Your own system calls for it.

If someone can allow they are a citizen, then they aren't going anywhere

What about LPRs who get caught up in your thought police world?

. I think there is a process to remove citizenship

Pretty fucking easy to look up

 

[BuaConstrictor]

Lol did you read the article or did you just copy the link?

Yes. You asked who wouldn't have access to prove they are citizens specifically related to the SAVE Act.(referenced by Colorado)

That link answers that question. Try and keep up.

 

[NorthDakota]

Anyone without birth certificate matching their current name or without a passport. Personally I have plenty of trans friends that fall into this category and are at risk of not being able eligible to vote if it passes into law

That's voter registration. Not appealing a mythical deportation order.

If you went to a judge it wouldn't be an issue.

 

[NorthDakota]

I'm 100% correct. You even stipulated to it.


Your words. Not mine.


Did I say that? I'm asking you to layout your idea.

How would they go about doing that? How much time would be given?

So you agree with even non-citizens having due process?

Do you disagree with the Trump admin deporting people prior to having due process rights in court? Your own system calls for it.

What about LPRs who get caught up in your thought police world?


Pretty fucking easy to look up

What are you talking about? This is a mess lmao

 

[NorthDakota]

Yes. You asked who wouldn't have access to prove they are citizens specifically related to the SAVE Act.(referenced by Colorado)

That link answers that question. Try and keep up.

You seem confused.

 

[ColoradoIrish]

That's voter registration. Not appealing a mythical deportation order.

If you went to a judge it wouldn't be an issue.

If it went to judge, which we've seen doesn't necessarily happen, and would it even matter if they don't listen to the judges orders? Which we've seen they just ignore

 

[BuaConstrictor]

you don't need documents to prove things in court

Re: more broadly to immigration... I'm sure you and the rest of the MAGA mongoloids would totally accept the explanation in court that the person is a citizen and they just lost their paperwork! "Trust me!" I'm sure that would fly with you.

 

[ab2cmiller]

What are you talking about? This is a mess lmao

I'm just imagining Bua's comments. LMAO

 

[BuaConstrictor]

You seem confused.

I'm not. You for sure are though.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

That's voter registration.

Yeah, dumb shit....that's the SAVE act that Colorado specifically mentions..in this post...right here.

What about citizens that are born here but won't be able to prove it based on new requirements in the save act?

 

[NorthDakota]

If it went to judge, which we've seen doesn't necessarily happen, and would it even matter if they don't listen to the judges orders? Which we've seen they just ignore

I already provided for that in my hypothetical.

If someone says they are a citizen, they should have an opportunity to prove that.

That hasn't been the case.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

If someone says they are a citizen, they should have an opportunity to prove that.

How would they do so?

 

[NorthDakota]

Re: more broadly to immigration... I'm sure you and the rest of the MAGA mongoloids would totally accept the explanation in court that the person is a citizen and they just lost their paperwork! "Trust me!" I'm sure that would fly with you.

It's not just losing paperwork lol. You'd have to be a legit psychopath to have nothing in your life that makes it seem more likely than not that you are a citizen.

 

[BuaConstrictor]

You'd have to be a legit psychopath to have nothing in your life that makes it seem more likely than not that you are a citizen.

Re: to the SAVE Act..what else could you provide?

What if you provide proof, the judiciary sides with you..but the executive doesn't and they still remove you?