Immigration

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Do you feel it's important that immigrants to this country respect our sovereignty or not? It really is that simple once you get rid of all of the emotional, mind job, bs...

That is true. This issue does not however, exist in a vacuum. What is US Sovereignty these days anyway? Corporations and the ultra wealthy do not have to respect it. Shit the royal family of the country that produced all of the people involved in the worst terrorist attack in US history owns half of Manhattan. Frankly I think that's a much bigger issue than a bunch of people entering illegally from
Mexico and Guatemala so Americans can gorge themselves on the fruits of that groups labor.
 
C

Cackalacky

Guest
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Federal judge orders government to continue DACA and accept new applicants, in toughest blow yet to Trump’s efforts to end program <a href="https://t.co/p2H4kYOJvT">https://t.co/p2H4kYOJvT</a></p>— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/988936584191008768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
What Will The Immigration Muddle Mean For Construction Employers? (Engineering New Record)
The Trump administration policies could play havoc at project jobsites
https://www.enr.com/articles/44245-what-will-the-immigration-muddle-mean-for-construction-employers

The exact number of immigrants in construction who could be affected by current and pending policy changes is difficult to track, with varying levels of reporting (see charts, at top). Studies identify about 41,000 DACA-covered workers and some 37,000 TPS-protected (Temporary Protected Status) Salvadorans in construction. Notably, the University of Kansas Center for Migration Research study found that, among working men, 23% reported employment in construction or in painting—the number one source of work.

More broadly, a 2017 Pew Research Center study reported that of roughly 10 million U.S. construction workers, 15% are undocumented immigrants and 12% are legal. About 21% of adult undocumented workers in California work in construction, according to the University of Southern California Center for the Study of Immigrant Rights.

In other estimates, the U.S. undocumented share is 24%, while Texas-based economist and longtime immigration trends analyst M. Ray Perryman says that the state has a 30% proportion.
The Associated General Contractors reported in January that 75% of firms plan to expand staff in 2018, and 82% expect key difficulties in filling worker gaps. TPS holders are a major construction workforce presence in large cities such as New York City, Los Angeles and Miami, says the National Immigration Forum. With the largest Salvadoran community in the U.S., the Washington, D.C., area is bracing for a significant local industry impact if TPS holders must depart.

“You think we have a tight labor force now? Wait until TPS ends—then we will really feel it,” says Dennis Desmond, business manager at Washington, D.C.-based Laborers’ union Local 11, whose membership has nearly doubled since the recession.

Of its 3,100 laborers serving nearly 200 contractors, he estimates 25% are TPS holders. Even if contractors are able to replace experienced skilled labor with new apprentices, there could be jobsite consequences.

Texas builders fear fallout of immigration crackdown on workforce (Houston Chronicle)
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/bu...ders-fear-fallout-of-immigration-10959823.php
 
Last edited:

Rogue219

Well-known member
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
1,080
Leviticus 19:33-34
Matthew 25:35
Deuteronomy 27:19
Hebrews 13:2
Luke 10:25-37
Zechariah 7:9-10
Ezekiel 47:22
Jeremiah 7:5-7
Deuteronomy 10:18
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
What Will The Immigration Muddle Mean For Construction Employers? (Engineering New Record)

https://www.enr.com/articles/44245-what-will-the-immigration-muddle-mean-for-construction-employers


Texas builders fear fallout of immigration crackdown on workforce (Houston Chronicle)
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/bu...ders-fear-fallout-of-immigration-10959823.php

I'm not going to feel sorry for builders who break the law by hiring people who break the law. I have a family member who owns a roofing/siding company. Trying to compete with companies who hire illegals has been detrimental and has forced legal wages down. The liberal economists who claim no impact to the working class need to step off their campuses or outside of the cushy think tanks and visit some builders, and employee's families who don't skirt the law.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Leviticus 19:33-34
Matthew 25:35
Deuteronomy 27:19
Hebrews 13:2
Luke 10:25-37
Zechariah 7:9-10
Ezekiel 47:22
Jeremiah 7:5-7
Deuteronomy 10:18

Since you brought the Bible into it....

King James Bible, Timothy 5:8
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

I'm all for treating others great. I'm very supportive of legal immigration. I'm also for enforcing the law. I'm also for individual giving, which I do (both in time and $) to a local refuge organization. We're in this mess because states have made a choice to selectively not enforce existing laws. When you reward those that break the law, you encourage others to do so as well. Each American should decide who they want to be charitable to.
 

Rogue219

Well-known member
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
1,080
Since you brought the Bible into it....

King James Bible, Timothy 5:8
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

I'm all for treating others great. I'm very supportive of legal immigration. I'm also for enforcing the law. I'm also for individual giving, which I do (both in time and $) to a local refuge organization. We're in this mess because states have made a choice to selectively not enforce existing laws. When you reward those that break the law, you encourage others to do so as well. Each American should decide who they want to be charitable to.

I'm talking about people who come to the border from Nicaragua, El Salvador, Mexico, Honduras, etc. who are seeking asylum, legally. These people present themselves to customs officers at our border and are not floating over the Rio Grande sneaking into the country illegally. They're seeking safe haven for themselves, their families, etc. because of oppression or because other family members have been murdered in their homelands.

This administration has decided to separate these families, children from their parents, for doing nothing wrong. So they are not breaking the law and are being far from anything that resembles being rewarded.

Continue to do whatever you want with your time and money. These asylum seekers, however, are not criminals and it would be nice if maybe our media would explain this to people not as informed as yourself. Of which there are plenty.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
I'm talking about people who come to the border from Nicaragua, El Salvador, Mexico, Honduras, etc. who are seeking asylum, legally. These people present themselves to customs officers at our border and are not floating over the Rio Grande sneaking into the country illegally. They're seeking safe haven for themselves, their families, etc. because of oppression or because other family members have been murdered in their homelands.

If fleeing oppression is their true driver, why didn't the Nicaraguans, El Salvadorians, or Hondurans, just stay in MX, or take a shorter trip even to Belize or Costa Rica? Instead, they come thousands of miles to the US. I'm not saying that every asylum seeker is full of shit, but the Left uses the whole asylum angle for political purposes. And the great majority of illegal immigrants are coached what to say. People can escape oppression a lot easier and not travel so far.... if that was their true purpose.

I'm friends with a Brazilian family, who came 20 ish years ago to the US illegally. I've known them since 2001. They've been guest at my house, and i spent last Thanksgiving as their guest. Awesome Brigadeiro. Wonderful folks. They had a son currently going to college here, and an upstanding young man. Both parents ended up marrying a US citizen so they could attain legal status. Pure sham marriages. The husband is a tax payer for the most part and has his own GC business, the wife runs her own "business" and does not pay taxes for the most part.

They actually did pretty well in Brazil, but came here for more opportunity. I've learned a lot from them about the illegal network, and how they are supported. They are coached very well about what to say to immigration officials. The means at which they entered illegally (visa overstay), stayed illegally, got IDs, got sham marriages, etc. was pretty well structured. Guess what they were coached to say in the early days of their stay... you got it, asylum....

Anyway, I love them dearly and I'm glad they are here. The funniest thing... they all love Trump, and the kid is actually a key campaigner for a far right GOP candidate here in GA....

This administration has decided to separate these families, children from their parents, for doing nothing wrong. So they are not breaking the law and are being far from anything that resembles being rewarded.

Number one, if they are here illegally, they broke the law. Number 2, the BS photo that the left was tweeting across social media was from the Obama administration. The left wants nothing short of THEIR WAY on the immigration issue. They could have had a DACA deal done. They would rather have the issue to run on at mid terms. What you are talking about, if it does happen, would not have happened at all if states would have enforced existing laws on the books in the first place.

Continue to do whatever you want with your time and money. These asylum seekers, however, are not criminals and it would be nice if maybe our media would explain this to people not as informed as yourself. Of which there are plenty.

Thanks, I will.
The media is doing it's best to sensationalize immigration. The left plays up the kids, the right plays up the criminals.

So here's an honest question. Would you exchange amnesty for any illegal (without a criminal record, and willing to pay taxes), for strict border security and law enforcement going forward?
 

Rogue219

Well-known member
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
1,080
If fleeing oppression is their true driver, why didn't the Nicaraguans, El Salvadorians, or Hondurans, just stay in MX, or take a shorter trip even to Belize or Costa Rica? Instead, they come thousands of miles to the US. I'm not saying that every asylum seeker is full of shit, but the Left uses the whole asylum angle for political purposes. And the great majority of illegal immigrants are coached what to say. People can escape oppression a lot easier and not travel so far.... if that was their true purpose.

This is what I get for actually pointing out what's in the Bible. Well, poke the message board hornet nest and get typing....

Belize and Costa Rica aren't America to some people. It's all about an idea, as you know. As I understand it, Costa Rica is having a refugee "crisis" of their own as well? We tout ourselves as the greatest country in the world, then get mad when people want to come here legally or otherwise. I don't know why people would risk coming all the way here. I don't know why my grandparents came here when they could have gone elsewhere. If I had to guess, I'd say the idea of America, but I don't know what is in the minds of others. I can guess.


I'm friends with a Brazilian family, who came 20 ish years ago to the US illegally. I've known them since 2001. They've been guest at my house, and i spent last Thanksgiving as their guest. Awesome Brigadeiro. Wonderful folks. They had a son currently going to college here, and an upstanding young man. Both parents ended up marrying a US citizen so they could attain legal status. Pure sham marriages. The husband is a tax payer for the most part and has his own GC business, the wife runs her own "business" and does not pay taxes for the most part.

They actually did pretty well in Brazil, but came here for more opportunity. I've learned a lot from them about the illegal network, and how they are supported. They are coached very well about what to say to immigration officials. The means at which they entered illegally (visa overstay), stayed illegally, got IDs, got sham marriages, etc. was pretty well structured. Guess what they were coached to say in the early days of their stay... you got it, asylum....

Anyway, I love them dearly and I'm glad they are here. The funniest thing... they all love Trump, and the kid is actually a key campaigner for a far right GOP candidate here in GA....

Who is coaching them? These are the people we would WANT, though, right? They are working, law abiding, filling their end of the social contract. The kid is wasting his time getting over-educated, but he's following their path to working and holding up his end of the social bargain. They're not behaving like criminals, regardless of their coaching.

Number one, if they are here illegally, they broke the law. Number 2, the BS photo that the left was tweeting across social media was from the Obama administration. The left wants nothing short of THEIR WAY on the immigration issue. They could have had a DACA deal done. They would rather have the issue to run on at mid terms. What you are talking about, if it does happen, would not have happened at all if states would have enforced existing laws on the books in the first place.

I don't know what photo you're talking about. I didn't mention a photo. I'm speaking about people who are presenting themselves to our officials legally and are not sneaking in. They're being put in empty Walmart stores and US Senators are not being allowed to see what's inside. Let's say regardless of who is in The White House, I don't really trust that kind of behavior at all. That exactly transparency, and we all love the T word until it gets used against the party of our choice.

I'm in full agreement with you about the illegals but it is a separate issue to the people who are not sneaking into the country and are not breaking any rules, regardless of what they're coached to say. I'm not in agreement with you at all about the DACA deal.

There wasn't a thread for migrants or asylum seekers. I may have misplaced my scripture passages with that said. Sorry.



Thanks, I will.

I was surprised you brought it up. I don't think my intent was to tell you what to do with your time and money. I just tossed a couple of Bible passages onto a message board. To hell with me if I tell you what you should be doing.

The media is doing it's best to sensationalize immigration. The left plays up the kids, the right plays up the criminals.

Don't be so hard on the media. I saw the story the other night on the news about a dog race on the last day of school at an elementary school not even in the state I live in. Oh, and Roseanne did something.

So here's an honest question. Would you exchange amnesty for any illegal (without a criminal record, and willing to pay taxes), for strict border security and law enforcement going forward?

Illegals who are willing to pay taxes should have to get on a road to citizenship.
I'll spare you the story of a tenant I had in one of my properties who became a citizen.
It's a long, expensive process, but the pride she felt when it was over is something I don't know that I could explain. Whatever this path to citizenship may look like, I don't know, that's up to Congress. With this Congress, I have no hope they can figure it out. They're busy worried about what their donors want. Maybe next year.

I don't want a fucking wall. Use the billions of dollars in resources that are already there as effectively as possible. I'm sure they can find ways they can be smarter and more efficient with what they have.


It is what it is, as the saying goes. I don't know what we have to gain as a nation for treating people this way who are coming here, regardless of whatever they're being coached to say, and presenting themselves to our border officials. Some data shows it isn't an effective deterrent. Again, I don't know. I don't think anyone supports the criminals or gang members either, but it makes for great commercial ads. Yeah, we have a problem when we throw them out and they get right back in again. This is why we elect our reps in the House. They should be solving this and other issues. They seem to care about who writes them checks, however. Sad.
.
 

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,518
Reaction score
3,263
I'm talking about people who come to the border from Nicaragua, El Salvador, Mexico, Honduras, etc. who are seeking asylum, legally. These people present themselves to customs officers at our border and are not floating over the Rio Grande sneaking into the country illegally. They're seeking safe haven for themselves, their families, etc. because of oppression or because other family members have been murdered in their homelands.

This administration has decided to separate these families, children from their parents, for doing nothing wrong. So they are not breaking the law and are being far from anything that resembles being rewarded.

Continue to do whatever you want with your time and money. These asylum seekers, however, are not criminals and it would be nice if maybe our media would explain this to people not as informed as yourself. Of which there are plenty.

If the threshold to gaining legal entry and residency in the US was simply getting to the border, presenting yourself to a federal agent, and alleging that you are being persecuted or oppressed in your native nation, how many people would migrate?

Mexicans and Salvadorans Have Positive Picture of Life in U.S. | Pew Research Center

Nearly six-in-ten Salvadorans (58%) say they would migrate to the U.S. if they had the means and opportunity to do so, including 28% who would move without authorization. Fewer say the same in Mexico – 35% would move north if possible, including 20% who would do so without authorization.

The Pew polls I linked above suggest the numbers are incredibly high in both Mexico and El Salvador. I think it's reasonable to assume it would be similar in Nicaragua, Guatemala and Honduras, where 60% of their populations live in poverty. Mexico's population is roughly 130 million and the combined population of Central America exceeds 40 million. Assuming 35% (that's probably a conservative estimate) of the combined populations, given the opportunity, migrate to the US, we'd have about 50 million migrants moving into the country. That's over 15% of our current population.
Does that strike you as reasonable?
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
This is what I get for actually pointing out what's in the Bible. Well, poke the message board hornet nest and get typing....

Apologies if it bothered you, but it looked like a passive aggressive implication that those who don't support the free flow of immigrants are un-Christian. I simply replied with another bible quote.....

Belize and Costa Rica aren't America to some people. It's all about an idea, as you know. As I understand it, Costa Rica is having a refugee "crisis" of their own as well? We tout ourselves as the greatest country in the world, then get mad when people want to come here legally or otherwise. I don't know why people would risk coming all the way here. I don't know why my grandparents came here when they could have gone elsewhere. If I had to guess, I'd say the idea of America, but I don't know what is in the minds of others. I can guess.

The discussion point was primarily people seeking oppression. Now you're making it all about an "idea". First of all, I'm very supportive of legal immigration. I'd also be willing to give those already here amnesty. That said, you are incredibly naive if you think we should let everyone come that wants to come. There are cultural and economic ramifications. We have laws for a reason, and you're suggesting we should be selective of the laws we enforce. Selective enforcement is what has created the problem we are facing in the first place.

Who is coaching them? These are the people we would WANT, though, right? They are working, law abiding, filling their end of the social contract. The kid is wasting his time getting over-educated, but he's following their path to working and holding up his end of the social bargain. They're not behaving like criminals, regardless of their coaching.

There is a well defined network her in Atlanta that helps and coaches them. Part of the network is informal but structured, and part of it is formal (organizations, attorneys, non-profits). Personally speaking, yes I want the family here. But do you how many laws they have broken? From full tax evasion prior to the illegal sham marriages and partial afterward, false IDs, etc.. And then there's the economic impact. Between unpaid taxes, education, medical, etc., I'm sure there's at least 1M over the 20 years they've been here. That said, I'm very happy they are here. I love them dearly but I'm not blind to the impact, nor do I think it's OK to break the law.

I don't know what photo you're talking about. I didn't mention a photo. I'm speaking about people who are presenting themselves to our officials legally and are not sneaking in. They're being put in empty Walmart stores and US Senators are not being allowed to see what's inside. Let's say regardless of who is in The White House, I don't really trust that kind of behavior at all. That exactly transparency, and we all love the T word until it gets used against the party of our choice.

Merkley tried to create a spectacle. He called the media and invited them as an attention getting stunt..... He could have discussed with others in the Senate, made formal requests, reached out to TX senators or reps, but no, he trips to TX from OR, invites the press, and bingo, you have nothing more than a political stunt. WAPO (yes WAPO) even game Merkley 3 Pinocchios for some of his claims.

Back to my conversation about being coached. Every immigrant now knows the word "asylum". And the BS is making it hard now for the US to differentiate those who are truly in danger from the ones who are not.

PS... I don't claim a party.... I've very far left on some issues, moderate right on others. Probably farther left when it comes to education and health than most libs on this board. Immigration however, on between center and moderate right (OK with amnesty, OK with DACA, but for law enforcement and border security going forward.

I'm in full agreement with you about the illegals but it is a separate issue to the people who are not sneaking into the country and are not breaking any rules, regardless of what they're coached to say. I'm not in agreement with you at all about the DACA deal.

There wasn't a thread for migrants or asylum seekers. I may have misplaced my scripture passages with that said. Sorry.

No worries. True asylum yes, coached asylum no.

Don't be so hard on the media. I saw the story the other night on the news about a dog race on the last day of school at an elementary school not even in the state I live in. Oh, and Roseanne did something.

Screw the media. Both sides... If you want to read true fact based reporting, try Reuters or some other non-biased source. If you get your news only from CNN, MSNBC, or Fox, your reading something that is designed to be bias, get clicks, and influence. The Forth Estate has lost it's soul a long time ago.

Illegals who are willing to pay taxes should have to get on a road to citizenship.
I'll spare you the story of a tenant I had in one of my properties who became a citizen.
It's a long, expensive process, but the pride she felt when it was over is something I don't know that I could explain. Whatever this path to citizenship may look like, I don't know, that's up to Congress. With this Congress, I have no hope they can figure it out. They're busy worried about what their donors want. Maybe next year.

I'm all for legal immigration, and a well defined, but inexpensive road to citizenship. There are plenty of orgs out there that help with guidance and free legal.

I don't want a fucking wall. Use the billions of dollars in resources that are already there as effectively as possible. I'm sure they can find ways they can be smarter and more efficient with what they have.

I don't care about a wall, but we do need to secure and enforce the border. Tough talk alone, and the assumption that laws would be enforced decreased illegal immigration significantly.

It is what it is, as the saying goes. I don't know what we have to gain as a nation for treating people this way who are coming here, regardless of whatever they're being coached to say, and presenting themselves to our border officials. Some data shows it isn't an effective deterrent. Again, I don't know. I don't think anyone supports the criminals or gang members either, but it makes for great commercial ads. Yeah, we have a problem when we throw them out and they get right back in again. This is why we elect our reps in the House. They should be solving this and other issues. They seem to care about who writes them checks, however. Sad.

Everything within reason. The PEW research that WB provided is real. While I'd love reality to be a Coke commercial, it's not. Politicians don't want to come together and compromise, they want to sensationalize and divide. They are doing a great job. Merkley is one of them.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,701
Reaction score
6,002
The furthest I'd go for any of the immigrants, DACA can stay. No citizenship. Ever. The fact that they'd be allowed to stay is as much as they could reasonably ask for.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
The furthest I'd go for any of the immigrants, DACA can stay. No citizenship. Ever. The fact that they'd be allowed to stay is as much as they could reasonably ask for.

What do you think we should do with the millions of American children who would see their parents deported?
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
What do you think we should do with the millions of American children who would see their parents deported?

They do have a choice.... they can stay, or return with their parents..

Seriously though, not many want mass deportation. But they also want to turn the faucet off. The problem is the extremes on both sides have done such a great job of creating a divide, nothing gets done.

So question...

Would you trade:

DACA approved and Amnesty for all illegals currently in the US who have no criminal record.

for....

Strict law enforcement going forward, increased border security, the end of sanctuary cities, no citizenship for those that entered illegally (they can stay permanently, but never a citizen), and an end to chain immigration.
 

Rogue219

Well-known member
Messages
5,430
Reaction score
1,080
If data claiming there is a labor shortage right now is close to accurate, I'd think we'd want America to welcome immigrants legally and get them into the system to contribute.

My white 30 year old college grad brother in law who is unemployed and living with his parents doesn't intend to work in a meat plant or pick vegetables. It's beneath him. He has his dignity, his parents' couch and no job.

There are a lot of people who feel like him and there are a lot of people who want to come here for work and to start a life. Enforce the laws we have, make them more efficient and get people on a path to citizenship.

I don't know that this happens with Wall Street Democrats in the Senate and Steve Miller whispering into Fat Donnie's ear.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Arizona lawmaker: Immigrants represent 'threat' to U.S. due to lack of 'white kids' (Az Central)

Text from video:
60 percent of public school children in the state of Arizona today are minorities. That complicates racial integration because there aren't enough white kids to go around. And when you look at that 60 percent number for public school students, just carry that forward 10 or 15 years. It's going to change the demographic voting base of this state. And that's what's going on around the country. Immigration is politically destabilizing. President Trump has talked about this. Immigration today represents an existential threat to the United States. If we don't do something about immigration very, very soon, the demographics of our country will be irrevocably changed and we will be a very different country. It will not be the country you were born into.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Ann Coulter: The Irish Aren’t Red-Headed Mexicans (Breitbart)

Yes, and the people who said it were right. Let’s not sugarcoat what wonderful immigrants the Irish were.

All immigrants have been a problem in their own way. Italian immigrants brought us organized crime, something America had never experienced before. Jewish immigrants brought us radicals, communists and anarchists, setting off bombs all over the place. Irish immigrants brought poverty and shocking levels of crime — also William Brennan and Teddy Kennedy, the two men who did more than any others to wreck our country.

In the draft riots of 1863, New York City’s Irish exploded in feral violence over the Emancipation Proclamation, fearful that they would soon have to compete with freed blacks for jobs.

The Irish ran wild, lynching blacks and burning black establishments to the ground. As described in Leslie M. Harris’ book “In the Shadow of Slavery: African Americans in New York City, 1626–1863,” the Irish rioters “made a sport of mutilating the black men’s bodies, sometimes sexually. A group of white men and boys mortally attacked black sailor William Williams — jumping on his chest, plunging a knife into him, smashing his body with stones — while a crowd of men, women and children watched.”

Luckily for the Irish, there were no ethnic activist groups leaping in to excuse their bad behavior. President Lincoln sent in federal troops to crush the savage uprising. (Hey, President Trump! Lincoln is a very popular president!)

History of the NYC Draft Riots linked.

And these were European immigrants, most of whom spoke English, contrary to the claptrap you’ve heard in reaction to Kelly’s remark this past week. Today we’re getting peasants who not only don’t speak English, they don’t even speak Spanish and are also illiterate in their own dialects.

The Irish were driven out of their country by a one-time calamity — the potato famine. This wasn’t how they always lived. Starving poverty wasn’t their culture.

Still, the Irish were — at one time — among the poorest immigrants we ever got and the slowest to assimilate. It took 120 years, by political analyst Michael Barone’s estimate. (Imagine a time when our worst immigrants were the Irish!)

Ann Coulter’s Immigrant Ancestors

All eight of her paternal great-great-grandparents (four couples) came to America from Europe. Six of these eight were Famine-era arrivals from Ireland, while the other two were from Germany. Her Irish ancestors wouldn’t have been welcomed with open arms as can be seen from these typical 19th century political cartoons showing the Irish as desperately poor, conniving, criminal, lazy, and impossible to assimilate (more examples here).
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
https://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/ge...came-white-immigrants-in-mid-19th-century-us/

How the Irish Became White is an interesting read. This history is always used to denounce the likes of Paul Ryan, Steve Bannon etc as Irish-Americans who don't deserve to identify as Irish.

I have enjoyed reading "The Graves are Walking: The Great Famine and the Story of the Irish People" by John Kelly (I assume the John K. to whom Coulter refers is the current Chief of Staff).

Another good read is "The Irish Americans" by Jay Dolan, formerly a ND prof.
 
Last edited:

loomis41973

Banned
Messages
4,055
Reaction score
203
Same as here...the actual average citizen understands the problem it's causing...Politicians and loony libs, not so much.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
Same as here...the actual average citizen understands the problem it's causing...Politicians and loony libs, not so much.

I actually disagree. I think there are segments of the population who understand it because they are actually impacted, an un-impacted segment who takes the time to understand it, and a large segment who rely on politicians and the media to tell they what they should "understand".

Let's face it, the largest direct impact is to low and lower middle class manual labor workers. Whole towns of working class people like Stillmore GA are crushed, while large urban populations are too big to see the individual crushing. The violence it brings is typically confined to low to middle class, and to a significant extent, is unreported when it's illegal on illegal violence. The biggest direct impacts are to African Americans.

Middle and upper class see more taxes / less paycheck, so the impact is more limited and their understanding is likely limited. Large business exploit the labor and increase their profits, so they sure in the hell understand it. The left sees identity politics, more taxes, bigger government, more votes, etc..

And I just love some of the pro-open border arguments

It's good for the economy - while partially true at a macro level, we certainly didn't need immigration in 50s to the 70s prior to the increases in the 80s through now. Check out Real GDP growth 50s-70s vs 80s-now. We did just fine....

We need them so that Social Security won't go bust - Who wants to give their money to a government sponsored Ponzi scheme. We're all fools for letting the government manage our money in the first place.

My favorite, we need them to cut our grass and do jobs others don't want. It's funny, people never had a problem getting their grass cut, or finding manual laborers in the 60s and 70s prior to all the immigration spikes.

We need them for US population growth - cough cough... we've got a great population density right now...
In 2017, more than a third of 50 Nobel prize-winning scientists surveyed by the Times Higher Education at the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings said that human overpopulation and environmental degradation are the two greatest threats facing humankind.[33] In November that same year, a statement by 15,364 scientists from 184 countries indicated that rapid human population growth is the "primary driver behind many ecological and even societal threats."[34]

And for all those that refuse to acknowledge the danger to existing society and culture, not sure how anyone can ignore a huge population demographic shift like the one the US is experiencing from 1960-2060. A huge flip flop in less than 100 years per Census projections is something you can't ignore. Well, actually, a lot of folks have.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-summit/merkel-presses-over-migration-as-european-solution-fails-idUSKBN1JJ176

Merkel presses over migration as 'European solution' fails

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Sunday she would seek direct deals with separate European Union states on migration, conceding the bloc had failed to find a joint solution to the issue threatening her government.

Since Mediterranean arrivals spiked in 2015, when more than a million refugees and migrants reached the bloc, EU leaders have been at odds over how to handle them. The feud has weakened their unity and undermined Europe’s Schengen free-travel area.

Sixteen EU leaders met for emergency talks in Brussels on Sunday hoping to get a deal for the full summit of all 28 states on June 28-29.

They will endorse further tightening of their external borders and giving more money to foreign countries to prevent people from setting sail for Europe. But they cannot agree on how to share out those asylum seekers who make it.

Wealthy Germany is where the newly-arrived mostly end up and Merkel is under pressure to curb the numbers. Her coalition partner is pushing for firmer action that could break her government.

“There will be bilateral and trilateral agreements, how can we help each other, not always wait for all 28 members,” she said.

French President Emmanuel Macron offered his backing, saying the solution should be “European” but it could just be several states together.

United Nations data shows only about 41,000 people have made it to the EU across the sea this year. But opinion polls show migration is the top concern of the EU’s 500 million citizens.

Since 2015, migration has decided elections across the bloc from Italy to Hungary, with voters favoring a tougher stance.

In response, the EU has turned increasingly restrictive on asylum and pushed to curb arrivals, a strategy denounced by rights groups.

ITALIAN GOVERNMENT
Italy has long struggled to cope with arrivals and its new populist government rejects any idea that would see it handle more people.

Rome has started turning away ships with migrants rescued at sea, saying it should not be the sole EU entry point. Malta could accept some in the coming days, sources said.

Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, who said he was leaving Brussels “decidedly satisfied”, also wants to drop the rules stipulating that the first EU country of arrival is responsible for any given person.

He said those who refuse to take in some of the new arrivals should get less money from EU coffers, an idea that is anathema to the four ex-communist states in the east who do not want to host anyone.

EU states will agree later this week to spend more money on Syrian refugees in Turkey and provide more cash for Africa projects.

They are considering setting up centers abroad to decide on asylum requests there and send back those whose cases fail. The EU would want the U.N. agencies for refugees and migration to run these sites.

A European solution means throwing more German money at things. We will be moving toward more cash and aid for places like Libya, we will beef up the EU border and coast guards, we will send more illegal migrants back,” one EU diplomat said.

“But we will always have legitimate asylum seekers who are entitled to our help. And we can’t agree how to divide the responsibility of caring for them.”

POLITICAL PRESSURE
Merkel’s conservative allies, Bavaria’s Christian Social Union (CSU), have threatened to start turning away at the German border those registered for asylum elsewhere unless the bloc agrees on spreading them around more evenly.

Migrants mostly stay in arrival countries like Greece and Italy or the wealthy ones where they try to start a new life.

But Hungary and Poland have refused to host any arrivals. Now backed by Austria, they want to end any further discussion on rules for sharing them out across the bloc.

Bad blood from the deadlock has spilled over to other areas of cooperation, including talks on the EU’s seven-year budget from 2021.

Merkel opposes the idea by the CSU, which faces off against the anti-immigration AfD party in Bavaria elections in October, as it would mean rigid border controls inside Schengen. That would have a knock-on effect on other EU states, hit cross-border business and travel.

A poll published in Germany on Sunday showed the dispute was weakening support for Merkel’s coalition and pushed the AfD to its highest ratings.

Even though EU leaders agree they want to go on curbing arrivals through working with third countries like Tunisia or Niger, such accords are complicated, slow and costly.

To convince the CSU, Merkel needs deals to stop migrants trekking north, as well as to send back to the coastal states those people who make it to Germany against EU rules.

Conte said such secondary movements would not be a problem if other EU states helped Italy more in dealing with arrivals.
 

Sea Turtle

Slow and steady wins the race
Messages
5,644
Reaction score
3,486
I just wish both parties would come together and better the situation for everyone instead of using it for political reasons.

Democrats want future voters.
Republicans want cheap labor.

It's just wrong and not fair to American laborors who are outbid by cheap labor or to existing citizens who have their vote artificially dilluted instead of a more natural dillution by legal immigration from all parts of the world.

Just my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Top