dshans
They call me The Dribbler
- Messages
- 9,624
- Reaction score
- 1,181
Hell, who in their right (or left) mind would want to spend an afternoon with dshans drinking beer now?
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/u4D0yx4DvBk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Yup.
I miss Minnesota.
It sent my spirits soaring.
It almost made the results of that Navy game tolerable.
I'd drop everything and run to have one more beer with my grandfather. I'm sure your children or grandchildren would do the same.
I was talking about illegals...based on your own data they are demonstrably low skilled. As well it is disingenuous to ignore children of immigrants who DO receive aid...and even if you attribute the same percentage rate of welfare fraud as is perpetrated by citizens to the illegal population, that is money worth having...so this idea that no new illegals means it isn't a problem is just not something I am willing to cede...and I really don't GAF where they come from.
Edit: as for employment...seriously, how many illegals are skilled. They didn't all go home, which means the non-skilled job pool, shrinking as it is, makes it harder to have illegals here...you make it sound as if they've all gone home.
Based on their immigration policies, we'll be describing it as Japanese for the foreseeable future.
I understand they have unresolved economic problems, but they are not willing to gamble on the safety of their citizens or the future of their culture/country on the idea that mass immigration will be the answer to their economic problems.
They seem more interested in fixing their own economic and low birth issues with their own citizens - provide incentives to increase native birth rates and use automation to replace a dying workforce. That strikes me as more reasonable than mass immigration.
We can grab beers in thirty years and talk about how this one played out.
Welfare fraud and "money worth having" is pretty much accounted for by the usage taxes being paused. Sales tax, gas tax, tolls, fraudulent FICA, etc. Their presence itself is an increase in demand for products, boosting jobs inherently. They make up the population of Ohio, it's a lot of costumers.
I never stated they all went home. Some have. Plenty of kids here and stayed. I'm saying if they don't have income they are pressured to find it elsewhere. They aren't eligible to sit at the unemployment line.
And there is no evidence that their presence drives up the unemployment rate an appreciable amount. We saw this trial run in Miami with Cubans too. Productive economies create jobs. Economists agree that we would need a tsunami of immigrants to drive up unemployment.
Wages though, are a different story. But given that illegal immigration hasn't increased from Mexico in a decade, it is your side that needs to justify a wall and figure out how to handle the 12 million (7ish from Mexico) who are here. It looks like a fait accompli to me.
‘Crime does pay!’ Report: San Francisco awarding $190K to illegal immigrant turned over to ICE – twitchy.com
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/o5dlRDdkS4">https://t.co/o5dlRDdkS4</a></p>— The Safest Space (@TheSafestSpace) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheSafestSpace/status/880555724408889344">June 29, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The city approved a Sanctuary City policy in 1989 prohibiting city officials from enforcing immigration laws in most cases as a way to encourage immigrant communities to trust and cooperate with police.
A second 2013 ordinance, Due Process for All, prohibits San Francisco law enforcement from detaining people on behalf of immigration authorities for deportation unless they are wanted for a serious crime.
Figueroa-Zarceno’s attorneys said the ICE document released Friday indicates that the sheriff’s department contacted ICE on Dec. 2 stating that a “final order fugitive” had been contacted by San Francisco police.
At the same time, the document states, a San Francisco police officer contacted the ICE duty officer directly and told him Figueroa-Zarceno was at the police station. He was taken into custody by ICE around half an hour later.
San Francisco To Pay Undocumented Immigrant $190K For Violating Sanctuary Policy
More than Twitchy headlines
Unless "Crime does pay" refers to settlements for violating city policy and ordinances...
Sand Mountain is Alabama's slice of Appalachia, a once-remote area that in the past few decades has directly experienced the kinds of divisive issues constantly in the national news: immigration, job outsourcing, the war on drugs. But it's a region too long defined by its challenges rather than its resilience.
In this multi-part series for AL.com, we'll take you up to Sand Mountain and show you a world in transition. Get to know this place through the people who live there, who are working to mend what's broken and restore their communities.
Although working-age adult refugees who enter the United States often initially rely on public assistance programs, a study by researchers at the University of Notre Dame indicates that the long-term economic benefit of admitting refugees outweighs the initial costs.
The study, published as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper this week, was conducted by William Evans, Keough-Hesburgh Professor of Economics, and Daniel Fitzgerald, undergraduate research assistant at Notre Dame’s Wilson Sheehan Lab for Economic Opportunities, or LEO. The study is a comprehensive assessment of the fiscal costs and benefits of refugee resettlement in the United States.
Using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, Evans and Fitzgerald analyzed the costs and benefits of resettling an average refugee who entered the United States between 1990 and 2014.
"If the Republican leadership will bring a bill to the floor of the Senate and the House, I'm confident we could pass [an immigration] bill," Cardin told CNN's "New Day" program. "The Senate did that a few years ago. We passed comprehensive immigration reform that did deal with the dreamers."
In new study, professor and undergraduate find economic benefits of admitting refugees outweigh costs (ND College of Arts and Letters Newsletter)
Net benefit long term?
Unskilled unvetted labor does nothing but drives the wages working class Americans to third world levels.
Worse than the economic cost is the cost to our way of life. These immigrants have no desire to become Americans...they are only here for money...
if they cared to be Americans they would have respected the laws of this country and entered the country legally.
Bullshit. 15k to resettle? My ass. Net benefit long term? Unskilled unvetted labor does nothing but drives the wages working class Americans to third world levels. Worse than the economic cost is the cost to our way of life. These immigrants have no desire to become Americans...they are only here for money...if they cared to be Americans they would have respected the laws of this country and entered the country legally.
Isolating these paragraphs because I think they're the most relevant. The problem with open borders immigration, whether legal or otherwise, is that it doesn't allow for assimilation. No, our ancestors didn't come here thinking George Washington was the bee's knees, but they came around to that way of thinking as they adopted American culture. They came to Ellis Island but then their kids learned English, rooted for the Yankees, and fought in two world wars.Bullshit on the former, and so what on the latter. Your ancestors didn't come here because they thought George Washington was the bee's knees, they came because of the economic opportunity to build a better life as Americans. It's not much different today.
It's also probably worth noting that the "we're not ignorant xenophobes, we actually like legal immigration a lot!" is an excuse that was torn to shreds when Donald Trump came out saying that we should slash legal immigration by 50% a few weeks ago.
Isolating these paragraphs because I think they're the most relevant. The problem with open borders immigration, whether legal or otherwise, is that it doesn't allow for assimilation. No, our ancestors didn't come here thinking George Washington was the bee's knees, but they came around to that way of thinking as they adopted American culture. They came to Ellis Island but then their kids learned English, rooted for the Yankees, and fought in two world wars.
Well the net benefit long term is a boost in GDP, maintaining a younger population that can extend the life of SS/Medicare, keep up with China/India on population so we have a puncher's chance of being the #1 world power in 2100, etc.
Immigrants also start companies at twice the rate of native-born Americans.
So the flip side is it increases the purchasing power of Americans, is that what you're saying? There is a degree of wage pressure, no doubt about that. But 1) Americans haven't shown a willingness to work picking vegetables (See: Alabama), and 2) wake me up when Republicans aren't backing right-to-work laws in an effort to gut the negotiating power of unions.
I work in the construction industry, in my experience it's not the Mexicans putting people out of work. If you're not on drugs and can show up on time, you'll have a job.
Back to the topic: the taxes they pay despite not being eligible for entitlement/retirement programs provides a one-way subsidy of Americans' vital Social Security/Medicare programs, that's noteworthy. The usage taxes on things like the sales tax, property tax, gas tax, tolls, etc etc etc etc are also enormous. The demand for goods and services is also enormous, and creates jobs.
Bullshit on the former, and so what on the latter. Your ancestors didn't come here because they thought George Washington was the bee's knees, they came because of the economic opportunity to build a better life as Americans. It's not much different today.
I'm going to take a wild guess and say that you don't have the slightest clue just how byzantine and stupid our immigration processes are.
It's also probably worth noting that the "we're not ignorant xenophobes, we actually like legal immigration a lot!" is an excuse that was torn to shreds when Donald Trump came out saying that we should slash legal immigration by 50% a few weeks ago.
It was, is, and will always be a two-way street chief. Each generation is different than the one before it. There has never been a timeless and strict "American culture." But our general American culture is being spread around the world every day, and people like it. Turns out, people like freedoms, sports, and consumerism. Immigrants are no different, it's why they work so hard laying brick to afford this better lifestyle.
You present a very sloppy version of events. Fact is most first-generation immigrants don't learn perfect English, and previous waves of immigrants weren't shedding their native tongue either. Hell the federal government went ahead and cracked down on German-language newspapers during World War I, and there were certainly clashes with German-language protestant churches too.
But their kids are put through the public school system and turn out as American as you and I. They root for pro-sports teams, they join the military, they jump all of the weird hoops that you set out for them.
Things would be much different if we were taking on Muslims by the millions, like Europe did. I have no respect for the idea of welcoming people who don't appreciate things like equality of women and minorities, and secular government. But that's what makes the American immigration matter a no-brainer, our pool of low-skill labor is Mexican/Central American, Christian, and very assimilate-able.
Maintain a younger population? Corporate America has outsourced all the decent jobs and pushed for open borders to the point that prudent middle and lower classes have to make a financial decision whether to have children. There was a time when one income could support a family. Not anymore. Spare me the Americans won't do the job. They will do the job as long as the pay is commensurate to the work.
Illegal immigrants are not eligible for anything yet they take advantage of entitlements..welfare, Medicare,Medicaid, and tax subsidized schooling. So the buying power you speak of is an illusion, corporate America reaps the profits stemming from cheap labor and the American taxpayer covers the economic and social costs. You espouse the same arguments that were made in the 80's and Reagan gave those illegal immigrants Amnesty...here we are again. This time the giving nature of Americans have nearly reached their limit. Of course, if we don't accept Amnesty, we are Nazis and ignorant xenophobes.
There is a naivety in your comment. Back then, there wasn't affirmative action or diversity officers milking the taxpayer and cultivating a generation of victims and ethnic strife. Being white or espousing white/American culture wasn't vilified as it now. What culture are these immigrants going to assimilate to? You can burn the flag, tear down monuments, and riot as an illegal and at the same time demand the rights of US citizens....do you really think it will be the same?
Nah, I'd call you an ignorant xenophobe because, judging by your posts, you're clearly an ignorant xenophobe. It's really that simple.Of course, if we don't accept Amnesty, we are Nazis and ignorant xenophobes.
Ugh.
Yes, maintain a younger population. In case you missed it, the developed world is aging--quickly. It's worse in Europe and much worse in Japan. This will cause these nations to fade into economic oblivion if they don't change course, which is why you see Europe take on immigrants out of desperation. Demographics do not lie, and you can see the problem decades before it hits.
No, corporate America hasn't outsourced "all the decent jobs." For every 1 job outsourced, 7 were eliminated by automation. So for every 1,000,000 factory jobs lost to China or Mexico, 7,000,000 were lost to machines improving. In other words, just ~12.5% of "all the decent jobs" were eliminated via outsourcing.
This is the percentage of jobs in manufacturing, note the spike for World War II production....and then a remarkably consistent shift to other sectors. Please, point out where NAFTA causes a massive drop, or China joining the WTO, etc.
![]()
I am fully behind strengthening the bargaining power of employees and believe wage growth is one of the biggest problems with the US economy, but outsourcing and immigration aren't half the boogeyman you want them to be (because, I'd guess, they're easy targets).
Please note: illegal immigrants are not eligible for "welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, and tax subsidized schooling." In fact not even legal immigrants are eligible for welfare and such immediately. And please note that illegal immigrants who fraudulently obtain a job generate more than 11 billion annually in tax receipts for Social Security, Medicare, etc despite being ineligible to obtain benefits.
Again yeah it's pretty hard to shake the ignorant xenophobe moniker when people walk around spouting inaccurate talking points and back a guy who makes boneheaded moves just to appease said ignorance.
There are a number of factors that have lead to the middle class' reduction, illegal immigration and outsourcing aren't where I'd start.
Nah, I'd call you an ignorant xenophobe because, judging by your posts, you're clearly an ignorant xenophobe. It's really that simple.
And btw, you're a fucking "illegal" too. I'm just not a dick so I don't refer to you as one, but you're just as "illegal" as the next guy.