- Messages
- 20,894
- Reaction score
- 8,126
I could easily see how someone would feel that his scandal disqualifies him based on #2. There are plenty of people, not only outside our fanbase, but within it that believe that Teo knew that she was fake well before the title game and lied to maintain the "grieving hero". That deception, if one felt it was true, would certainly not be up to the standards of the values Notre Dame represents.
That's like saying, "I can see how people who believe America faked the moon landing might have mixed feelings about Buzz Aldrin." The dude's an American hero, full stop, and the fact that some credulous idiots believe a crackpot conspiracy theory doesn't change anything.
At this point, it's pretty clear that Te'o was duped and didn't mislead anyone in an attempt to boost his Heisman campaign. If there are any Irish fans here who still believe that vicious slander against one of our own, they need to be corrected.
Regarding those standards being high, that same person may feel that they absolutely should be. That the moniker is the highest honor, and by definition, extremely exclusive. Left only for those that absolutely nailed all three of the criteria.
If your standard is so high that no ND player in recent memory makes the cut, that's a strong indication there's a problem with your standard, and not with the exceptional young men our program regularly turns out. Then again, one need only browse Rock's House for a few moments to understand that absurdly unrealistic standards and general self-loathing seem to be quite common among our fan base...
Ahh yes....the staple of a good liberal democracy....voter intimidation.
That's not what Men of Action are wearing these days:
Last edited: