JughedJones
Banned
- Messages
- 3,147
- Reaction score
- 359
Surely you don't mean our ' post racial ' president...
Unfortunately, I think that's exactly what he meant.
Surely you don't mean our ' post racial ' president...
Being here in California, it seems funny to hear about people being arrested for marijuana possession. You'd have to have a LOT of pot to accomplish that here.
Lulz.....
This case shows us exactly the norm.
Edit: "African Americans are 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than whites, despite the fact that both racial groups use weed in virtually identical percentages."
Edit to the edit: I know I said I was done posting here... but this is crap. Racism is just that, racist.
The worst type is 'color blind' racism. It hurts more than the overt kind. Recognize.
I wish there were more women here, because I'm also a woman....and a lesbian.
Bobd- good explanation but the numbers don't match the theory of its just the dummies in each race.
Also if the majority in here think there is still not racism I may have to simply bow out of this thread gracefully. I thought this was well known. The kkk isnt hanging folks still, the police are doing a pretty good job of filling the jails with them. I have friends of many races and can tell you without a doubt, racism still exists as strong as it as In a long time. If you don't believe me that's ok. If you want to take a ride on the wild side, come with me on a field trip and I can show you easily. Black ppl can be racist too, not denying that at all. However that's not the issue because of the tilt of power and numbers in the usa. Not a conspiracy theorist gentlemen, only relaying actual facts that I have seen with my own two eyes. Seems black ppl feel the same way, have you heard any hip hop albums lately?
This has got to be a joke, right?
Where is your "wild side"?? Please, tell me.
And hip hop albums only contribute to the ignorant mindset of SOME black youth. You got some dumba$$ artist, that is totally detached from reality, complaining about a problem that he never encounters. Yeah, sounds like a REAL strong reference. I wonder how many buses Jay-Z has to sit in the back of....
Get a clue
Before you go all "will cost many thousands more lives" on us I'd like to see just how many lives the "stand your ground law has cost people so far. I'd also like to see in contrast how many times it has helped. The origin of reasoning behind the stand your ground comes from too many people getting convicted of defending themselves. The laws used to read more along the lines of you have to attempt to flee first and then if that doesn't work you can defend yourself with deadly force (not getting into exact wording or detail). There were good people getting sent to jail because they didn't attempt to flee first. In a situation like this it happens in the blink of an eye and most don't have the ablility to weigh whether they could run or if they should stand and fight.Did anyone else see the complete jury instructions in this case?
Earlier in the thread a bunch of posters were arguing back and forth about "stand your ground - castle theory" versus "stand your ground, hearing based upon 2005 FLA law." What almost no one I know knew, was that in the jury instructions the self defense requirements were lowered because of stand your ground, to a ridiculously low level.
As opposed to a fight along political or not being a racist, racist lines, I would just like to make the following statement. The execution of stand your ground laws as currently written by the gun lobby are going to have to be repealed or will cost many thousands more lives. I am upset because I legally and morally carry, and I don't want to have to give up my right.
I've honestly had this convo with a bunch of friends (mixed race group) and everyone agrees that there is still racism but that it is equally distributed from whites to blacks to Hispanics in both directions. I understand the empathy that people should have towards others and find that there is less empathy from blacks to black than one would think. There is a divide among them and the group that I would call educated and successful has a definite distain towards the group associated with screaming racism at every turn. They also feel that AL and Jesse are embarrassing to their race, and are moving things in the wrong direction. Sorry to hijack your question to Pat but the subject of this giant persecution against black america just does not exist. The past is the past and no one can move forward while still holding on to the past.Maybe people confuse racism with lack of empathy for people of other racial groups. Maybe they are two different things. I don't know. After all, we are tribal creatures.
I can state that of the people have not shown any empathy to members of another racial group, only a couple have tried to constantly turn that conversation to some meaningless topic to avoid the real issues. Pat, with all respect, do you believe African-American are better at dealing with pain because they have been toughened up by the troubles of their history?
I've honestly had this convo with a bunch of friends (mixed race group) and everyone agrees that there is still racism but that it is equally distributed from whites to blacks to Hispanics in both directions. I understand the empathy that people should have towards others and find that there is less empathy from blacks to black than one would think. There is a divide among them and the group that I would call educated and successful has a definite distain towards the group associated with screaming racism at every turn. They also feel that AL and Jesse are embarrassing to their race, and are moving things in the wrong direction. Sorry to hijack your question to Pat but the subject of this giant persecution against black america just does not exist. The past is the past and no one can move forward while still holding on to the past.
Before you go all "will cost many thousands more lives" on us I'd like to see just how many lives the "stand your ground law has cost people so far. I'd also like to see in contrast how many times it has helped. The origin of reasoning behind the stand your ground comes from too many people getting convicted of defending themselves. The laws used to read more along the lines of you have to attempt to flee first and then if that doesn't work you can defend yourself with deadly force (not getting into exact wording or detail). There were good people getting sent to jail because they didn't attempt to flee first. In a situation like this it happens in the blink of an eye and most don't have the ablility to weigh whether they could run or if they should stand and fight.
McCain backs Obama's call for 'stand your ground' review
1 hour ago
Sen. John McCain is backing President Barack Obama's call for the so-called "stand your ground" laws in Florida and other states to be reexamined in the wake of the George Zimmerman case.
"The 'stand your ground' law may be something that may needs to be reviewed by the Florida legislature or any other legislature that has passed such legislation," McCain said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday, two days after President Obama discussed Zimmerman's acquittal in the killing of Trayvon Martin.
The Arizona Republican said he thinks the self-defense law should be reviewed in his home state, too. "I'm confident that the members of the Arizona legislature will, because it is very controversial legislation," McCain said. Florida and Arizona are among 30 states with "stand your ground" laws on the books.
On Friday, Obama held a somber press conference at the White House to discuss the case, which is currently under review by the Justice Department for possible civil rights violations.
The president hinted that he didn't expect the review would lead to federal charges against Zimmerman.
"Traditionally, these are issues of state and local government, the criminal code, and law enforcement is traditionally done at the state and local levels—not at the federal level," Obama said. "The judge conducted the trial in a professional manner. The prosecution and the defense made their arguments. The jurors were properly instructed that in a case such as this reasonable doubt was relevant, and they rendered a verdict. And once the jury has spoken, that's how our system works."
But the commander in chief called for a review of the controversial "stand your ground" laws.
"And for those who resist that idea—that we should think about something like these 'stand your ground' laws—I just ask people to consider: If Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman, who had followed him in a car, because he felt threatened?" the president said.
"What I got out of the president's statement, which I thought was very impressive, is that we need to have more conversation in America," he said. "I need to talk to more of my Hispanic organizations in my state. I need to talk to more African-American organizations."
McCain's support was in stark contrast to fellow GOP Sen. Ted Cruz's reaction to Obama's remarks.
“It is not surprising that the president uses, it seems, every opportunity that he can to go after our Second Amendment right to bear arms,” the Texas senator said Friday in Iowa. “This president and this administration has a consistent disregard for the Bill of Rights.”
I understand your point, I think, but I never said anything close to "thousands."
...
... I would just like to make the following statement. The execution of stand your ground laws as currently written by the gun lobby are going to have to be repealed or will cost many thousands more lives. ...
Actually you said, "many thousands".
Murph quoted you accurately. See your post, below, with the quote highlighted (and emphasis added) in context. I used the IE quote function to transcribe your words. I added the emphasis.
Your use of the word "more" clearly indicates that many thousand have already died as a result of SYG.
Do you have a cite or is this just more of your usual hyperbole?
Obama co-sponsored legislation strengthening Illinois' "stand your ground" law
CHICAGO - This past week President Obama publicly urged the reexamination of state self-defense laws (see remarks below). However, nine years ago then-State Sen. Barack Obama actually co-sponsored a bill that strengthened Illinois' 1961 "stand your ground" law.
The Obama-sponsored bill (SB 2386) enlarged the state's 1961 law by shielding the person who was attacked from being sued in civil court by perpetrators or their estates when a "stand your ground" defense is used in protecting his or her person, dwelling or other property.
The bill unanimously passed the Democrat-controlled Illinois Senate on March 25, 2004 with only one comment, and passed the Democrat-controlled Illinois House in May 2004 with only two votes in opposition. Then-Governor Rod Blagojevich (D) signed it into law.
![]()
Record of Obama co-sponsoring SB 2386 | Source: Illinois General Assembly
![]()
Roll call of SB 2386 | Source: Illinois General Assembly
As U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) prepares to hold Senate hearings in September to scrutinize states' self-defense laws, he may wish to consider his home state's public policy, which his former colleague and fellow Illinoisan - President Obama - helped craft.
* * * * * * *
This past Friday when discussing the George Zimmerman case, President Obama suggested revisiting state "stand your ground laws" to determine whether the laws encouraged altercations rather than avoiding them, a position he didn't raise while a state senator.
Remarks from President Obama:
"Along the same lines, I think it may be useful for us to examine some state and local laws to see if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations, confrontations and tragedies as we saw in the Florida case, rather than diffuse potential altercations," Obama said.
"I know that there's been commentary about the fact that stand your ground laws in Florida were not used as a defense of the case. On the other hand, if we're sending a message as a society in our communities that someone who is armed has a right to use those firearms even if there's a way for them to exit from the situation, is that really going to be contributing to the kind of peace and security and order that we'd like to see?" he asked White House Press reporters.
"And for those who resist that idea that we should think about these stand your ground laws, I just have to ask these people to consider if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk, and do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt threatened?" Obama said.
"And if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we might want to examine those kinds of laws."
Obama co-sponsored legislation strengthening Illinois' "stand your ground" law - Illinois Review
Well isn't that inconvenient...
Obama co-sponsored legislation strengthening Illinois' "stand your ground" law
CHICAGO - This past week President Obama publicly urged the reexamination of state self-defense laws (see remarks below). However, nine years ago then-State Sen. Barack Obama actually co-sponsored a bill that strengthened Illinois' 1961 "stand your ground" law.
...
Obama co-sponsored legislation strengthening Illinois' "stand your ground" law
CHICAGO - This past week President Obama publicly urged the reexamination of state self-defense laws (see remarks below). However, nine years ago then-State Sen. Barack Obama actually co-sponsored a bill that strengthened Illinois' 1961 "stand your ground" law.
The Obama-sponsored bill (SB 2386) enlarged the state's 1961 law by shielding the person who was attacked from being sued in civil court by perpetrators or their estates when a "stand your ground" defense is used in protecting his or her person, dwelling or other property.
The bill unanimously passed the Democrat-controlled Illinois Senate on March 25, 2004 with only one comment, and passed the Democrat-controlled Illinois House in May 2004 with only two votes in opposition. Then-Governor Rod Blagojevich (D) signed it into law.
![]()
Record of Obama co-sponsoring SB 2386 | Source: Illinois General Assembly
![]()
Roll call of SB 2386 | Source: Illinois General Assembly
As U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) prepares to hold Senate hearings in September to scrutinize states' self-defense laws, he may wish to consider his home state's public policy, which his former colleague and fellow Illinoisan - President Obama - helped craft.
* * * * * * *
This past Friday when discussing the George Zimmerman case, President Obama suggested revisiting state "stand your ground laws" to determine whether the laws encouraged altercations rather than avoiding them, a position he didn't raise while a state senator.
Remarks from President Obama:
"Along the same lines, I think it may be useful for us to examine some state and local laws to see if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations, confrontations and tragedies as we saw in the Florida case, rather than diffuse potential altercations," Obama said.
"I know that there's been commentary about the fact that stand your ground laws in Florida were not used as a defense of the case. On the other hand, if we're sending a message as a society in our communities that someone who is armed has a right to use those firearms even if there's a way for them to exit from the situation, is that really going to be contributing to the kind of peace and security and order that we'd like to see?" he asked White House Press reporters.
"And for those who resist that idea that we should think about these stand your ground laws, I just have to ask these people to consider if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk, and do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt threatened?" Obama said.
"And if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we might want to examine those kinds of laws."
Obama co-sponsored legislation strengthening Illinois' "stand your ground" law - Illinois Review
Obama sure is doing his best to become the most hypocritical President in history.
Yeah, cause they don't all do stuff like that. Right?
Yeah, cause they don't all do stuff like that. Right?
Seriously? I have never heard of a politician sponsoring legislation that he later asked to be repealed, all in response to a single incident. ("Whoops, my bad Illinois")
If it's out there, please someone enlighten me, because this seems like totally new ground.
Yeah, cause they don't all do stuff like that. Right?