The graph is highly assumptive but fun-ish nevertheless. It can be said to indicate whether your team is performing better accumulatively or worse than others. (A good half can raise a bad half.) The key line would be the diagonal line through the center point (I labeled it the "Waterline" --- is your team above or under water compared to the majority so far.) Drawing parallel lines upwards from that, your team gets into higher and higher Air. This, I know is obvious, but I threw it out as precis to showing what our schedule looks like on this basis so far.
I circled our opponents. If graphs like this were congruent with what analysts and voters thought about teams, it shows that we are rooting for a very few teams to make our schedule look good. OK. We knew that. But did we think that Wisconsin (if it continues to improve) would be one of them? or BYU have as much clout as this graph shows? We'll probably send Purdue underwater, but will MSU march on (if they can repair the injuries we did to them?) Can Belichek find any 4-quarter magic? Stanford?Can Angeli find any decent teammates or coaches? A bunch of these teams could get above the Waterline, and we might need them to.
