Fatal shooting Charleston SC

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
I agree with you except for a deflection in your last paragraph.

I can state to you unequivocally that the US Flag flew over the Wounded Knee and Me Lai Massacre (As well as many other lesser know incidents.) But each of these black episodes were an act on the part of an individual or group without the support of the entire population. And at times did the act spread wider because of the fear or greed of the people? Yes. Were reparations made, responsibilities taken? Yes, also!

It wasn't unknown to the German citizenry, particularly those that surrounded the death camps that mass murder was going on. From the highest officials down to the common citizenry, the horrors of the death camps were denied, until Dwight Eisenhower took matters into his own hands. I always found the film of German citizens being forced by the Allied military to provide mortuary patrols to police and clean up the piles of bodies at the camps were particularly fitting, and offered some consolation.

Like that, when an imperfect but free society attempts to change (for the better) itself, a specific symbol can be picked, identified, and ostracized to achieve the same sort of healing. Is it "fair" for buffs or proponents of those symbols? No. But is it "hypocritical" of a society attempting to heal some old wounds? Not hardly.

The entire purpose for that battle flag was to fly as a symbol of traitorous rebels who were attacking a country that decided to do the right thing, take the moral high ground, and denounce slavery. I defy anyone who has defended that confederate flag to state that the meaning of Old Glory is so one dimensional! Any takers?

So in my opinion the hypocrisy lies in denying all the other things Old Glory stands for, and forgetting the true meaning of the battle flag of the Army of Northern Va.

As far as the rising sun (my dad always kept the head band a dead Zero pilot wore and a big chunk of the meatball from his fighter); few would find any redeeming quality with that symbol, other that imperial aggression and racism. I asked my father why he kept it. He replied to never forget.

My question would be, who would want that shit, anyway? We could go through all the other symbols that were brought up, but I guess you get the idea.

You do know the comparison was inclusive of a number of symbols, the american flag being one. The issue is that those symbols are seriously offensive to groups of people...but they are still for sale by the various retailers. I get the American Flag, and the rationale for why it makes sense...but on the whole the point i...do the ebays, amazons, etc. really care...or are they using sentiment to raise their good will...I choose the latter.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
My point was never that there was racist symbolism in the Wizard of Oz. I was merely refuting the idea that monkeys (flying or otherwise) were not used in a racist manner, in regards to African Americans. If your comment was limited strictly to the context of the movie, then I have no opinion on that. But you didn't specify "only in regards to the movie". You merely said that there was no connection between flying monkeys and racism towards African-Americans. I responded by pointing out where monkey was used in reference to an African American and it was absolutely interpreted to be a racist remark. It was deemed to be so racist that it cost arguably the greatest sports announcer of his era his job. And this is a discussion, not a court of law.

Thank you for making one of my points. There are times that you just have to say, "Goodnight Irene!"

No difference that Cosell was excused and the battle flag permanently retired.

That notwithstanding, my only and original point about GWTW versus WO is that GWTW was like Birth of a Nation, conceived by a racist, and promoted a racist view. Further, that both were subject to politicized historical revisionism. The Wizard of Oz, was not, no matter how those that suffer from a racist point of view want to interpret its symbolism.

I think I have made two clear points.

GWTW can be perceived as racist, or a tool of racists, much like Birth of a Nation, and the Wizard of Oz is not, and both films are contemporaries. This answers the question posed whether all films from that era were bathed in racism; they are not.

And at times events conspire, and times coalesce, so that some act or symbol needs to be publicly ostracized, banned, or retired, to remove it for its negative aspects from the public discourse.

Here is the entirety of the Cosell event :

During the "Halftime Highlights" segment of Monday Night Football on September 24, 1973, Cosell said "Look at that little monkey run!" when describing a 97-yard kickoff return by Washington Redskins player Joe Washington during the Sunday game against the St. Louis Cardinals. There was no outcry over this comment.

However, during a Monday Night Football telecast on September 5, 1983, Cosell said of Washington Redskins wide receiver Alvin Garrett, "That little monkey gets loose, doesn't he?"[23] The Rev. Joseph Lowery, then-president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, denounced Cosell's comment as racist and demanded a public apology, but Cosell refused, citing his past support for black athletes and stating that "little monkey" was an affectionate term he had used in the past for diminutive white athletes (including Mike Adamle, for whom Cosell was on record using the term 11 years prior), as well as for his own grandson. Cosell left the Monday Night Football booth following the 1983 season.

Cosell's ultimate dismissal from Monday Night Football may have come as the result of using the same "monkey" allusion with respect to Redskins wide receiver Art Monk ripping many after-catch yards into the end zone. "Look at that monkey go," he said, even though the moniker for Monk was an affectionate diminutive form like Jimmie for James.
 

GoldenDome

New member
Messages
808
Reaction score
61
You do know the comparison was inclusive of a number of symbols, the american flag being one. The issue is that those symbols are seriously offensive to groups of people...but they are still for sale by the various retailers. I get the American Flag, and the rationale for why it makes sense...but on the whole the point i...do the ebays, amazons, etc. really care...or are they using sentiment to raise their good will...I choose the latter.

My relatives were forced into internment camps in WW2 and they are celebrating 4th of July this week with a USA flag in their front yard.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
From Charlie Daniels:

"I have no desire to reinstate the Confederacy. I oppose slavery as vehemently as any man, and I believe that every human being, regardless of the color of their skin, is just as valuable as I am and deserves the exact same rights and advantages as I do.

Unfortunately, the Confederate battle flag has been adopted by hate groups - and individuals like Dylann Roof - to supposedly represent them and their hateful view of the races.

Please believe me when I say that, to the overwhelming majority of Southerners, the flag represents no such thing, but is simply a banner denoting an area of the nation and one's pride in living there."

I think most Southerners would agree with this sentiment.
 

GoldenDome

New member
Messages
808
Reaction score
61
From Charlie Daniels:

"I have no desire to reinstate the Confederacy. I oppose slavery as vehemently as any man, and I believe that every human being, regardless of the color of their skin, is just as valuable as I am and deserves the exact same rights and advantages as I do.

Unfortunately, the Confederate battle flag has been adopted by hate groups - and individuals like Dylann Roof - to supposedly represent them and their hateful view of the races.

Please believe me when I say that, to the overwhelming majority of Southerners, the flag represents no such thing, but is simply a banner denoting an area of the nation and one's pride in living there."

I think most Southerners would agree with this sentiment.

The Bellamy salute was also banned after the Nazi's adopted the 'heil Hitler'. How is this any different? Do you think we should still apply the Bellamy salute while saying the Pledge of Allegiance?
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
The Bellamy salute was also banned after the Nazi's adopted the 'heil Hitler'. How is this any different? Do you think we should still apply the Bellamy salute while saying the Pledge of Allegiance?

I don't have a problem with it. Intelligent and reasonable people realize it's not a show of Nazi support or subtle slap at Jews. It's just a gesture that happened to be used by another group whose views most of us don't agree with. If you don't draw a line somewhere we'll soon be banning all sorts of things because of some vague, tenuous, and outdated association with something that never crosses the minds of most people and does not represent any sort of support or belief on their part with the unacceptable group.

Do you want to ban red circles or balls because the Japanese Imperial army once fought under a flag with such a design? Let's force UGA to change their uniforms because they have the same color scheme as the Nazi flag. Let's do away with all dogs since Hitler was a dog lover. Do you use a hammer around your house? Want to be labeled a supporter of the Soviet pogroms against various ethnic groups because of it? Silly, right? Then let's cut the crap and stop stretching and twisting and turning one thing into something it isn't because of such nebulous and false associations just to push some sort of agenda or to worship at the holy altar of political correctness.
 

IrishJayhawk

Rock Chalk
Messages
7,181
Reaction score
464
I don't have a problem with it. Intelligent and reasonable people realize it's not a show of Nazi support or subtle slap at Jews. It's just a gesture that happened to be used by another group whose views most of us don't agree with. If you don't draw a line somewhere we'll soon be banning all sorts of things because of some vague, tenuous, and outdated association with something that never crosses the minds of most people and does not represent any sort of support or belief on their part with the unacceptable group.

I can totally appreciate this perspective.

I guess we just disagree what constitutes "vague" and "tenuous." The confederate battle flag has "battle" right in its name. To my understanding of history, there's no doubt what it was about prior to the 1950s and 60s. And there's no doubt why the Dixiecrats adopted it as a symbol at that time.
 
Last edited:

dshans

They call me The Dribbler
Messages
9,624
Reaction score
1,181
It was just fine. Everyone should sing...regardless of the perceived quality. It was powerful.

Dance as though no one is watching, sing as though no one is ls listening.



Cut loose. Let your freak flag fly. Let it all hang out.

Emotion trumps "pitch perfect" every time.
 

choo choo

crusty veteran
Messages
1,019
Reaction score
543
From Charlie Daniels:

"I have no desire to reinstate the Confederacy. I oppose slavery as vehemently as any man, and I believe that every human being, regardless of the color of their skin, is just as valuable as I am and deserves the exact same rights and advantages as I do.

Unfortunately, the Confederate battle flag has been adopted by hate groups - and individuals like Dylann Roof - to supposedly represent them and their hateful view of the races.

Please believe me when I say that, to the overwhelming majority of Southerners, the flag represents no such thing, but is simply a banner denoting an area of the nation and one's pride in living there."

I think most Southerners would agree with this sentiment.

you are EXACTLY right sir...my son (grown up in the south) is very very proud of his region...he has a confederate flag in his room...and his best friend (justice) is black..doesnt seem to both jutice any...i think what frustrates him most is that talk of anyone flying that flag is racist (he is admitingly regionalist)...he is a tennessee fan (ive done my best and he does love the irish - just not as much) but i dont hold that against him...not everyone in the south belongs to the kkk...i dont know any...i dont think these people are any more racist than anyone else
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
I don't have a problem with it. Intelligent and reasonable people realize it's not a show of Nazi support or subtle slap at Jews. It's just a gesture that happened to be used by another group whose views most of us don't agree with. If you don't draw a line somewhere we'll soon be banning all sorts of things because of some vague, tenuous, and outdated association with something that never crosses the minds of most people and does not represent any sort of support or belief on their part with the unacceptable group.

Are you confident that "most people" includes the ~25% of Southerners who are African-American? Because that seems not to be true for a lot of them. I don't doubt that most modern Southerners who endorse the Confederate Battle Flag do so out of a sense of regional pride instead of racist animosity. But it's not about their intent; it's about the message that symbol sends to the millions of African-Americans in the Deep South; citizens who are supposed to be equal in dignity under state governments that continue to fly the flag, despite its painful history for them.

I'll re-up my hypothetical about New York City adopting the Swastika as its municipal flag. Do you think that would be a legitimate decision for the majority of New Yorkers to make (over the objections of a significant minority)? If not, how is that different from the Confederate Battle Flag?
 

IrishJayhawk

Rock Chalk
Messages
7,181
Reaction score
464
Are you confident that "most people" includes the ~25% of Southerners who are African-American? Because that seems not to be true for a lot of them. I don't doubt that most modern Southerners who endorse the Confederate Battle Flag do so out of a sense of regional pride instead of racist animosity. But it's not about their intent; it's about the message that symbol sends to the millions of African-Americans in the Deep South; citizens who are supposed to be equal in dignity under state governments that continue to fly the flag, despite its painful history for them.

I'll re-up my hypothetical about New York City adopting the Swastika as its municipal flag. Do you think that would be a legitimate decision for the majority of New Yorkers to make (over the objections of a significant minority)? If not, how is that different from the Confederate Battle Flag?

Also, the Swastika has a longer history than the Confederate Battle Flag. That history includes wide usage in various religious traditions (Christianity included).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
If not, how is that different from the Confederate Battle Flag?

I agree with your view on the Confederate flag, but to just this one point, in particular:

The City of New York doesn't have any kind of history with the Swastika, so any claim of ancestral or regional pride would be impossible to support. Whereas, many cities and states in the South DO have a historical connection to the Confederate flag.
 

IrishJayhawk

Rock Chalk
Messages
7,181
Reaction score
464
I agree with your view on the Confederate flag, but to just this one point, in particular:

The City of New York doesn't have any kind of history with the Swastika, so any claim of ancestral or regional pride would be impossible to support. Whereas, many cities and states in the South DO have a historical connection to the Confederate flag.

See above. The Swastika (hooked cross) has an ancient tradition in multiple faiths and worldviews.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
I agree with your view on the Confederate flag, but to just this one point, in particular:

The City of New York doesn't have any kind of history with the Swastika, so any claim of ancestral or regional pride would be impossible to support. Whereas, many cities and states in the South DO have a historical connection to the Confederate flag.

Understood, and it's not a perfect analogy, but as Jayhawk mentioned above, the Swastika is an ancient symbol with, AFAIK, only positive connotations before the Nazi's adopted and tainted it. So NYC could adopt it and honestly state they're only endorsing its positive pre-20th century meaning; just as defenders of the Confederate Battle Flag claim they're only endorsing it as a symbol of regional pride.

The point of the analogy is that the intent of those adopting it is largely irrelevant when it's a tainted symbol that is deeply offensive to a significant minority of those whom the symbol is supposed to represent.
 

JughedJones

Banned
Messages
3,147
Reaction score
359
Have you guys really been going on about how the Confederate Battle flag isn't quite as bad, or just a little similar to the Nazi Swastika?


Sweet.

So... How are we coming down on this one? Is it barely not as bad?
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
But does it have a connection to NYC, specifically? I didn't see it, if it does.

Does it matter? If I found some connection between NYC and the Swastika, would you be OK with the city adopting it as its municipal flag over the objection of 2 million Jews who still remember the Holocaust?
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Does it matter? If I found some connection between NYC and the Swastika, would you be OK with the city adopting it as its municipal flag over the objection of 2 million Jews who still remember the Holocaust?

No. But I also have stated that the violence and hatred that the Confederate flag symbolizes, should take precedence over any cultural/regional pride. I was just commenting on one narrow portion of the hypothetical, because the question was asked.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
My relatives were forced into internment camps in WW2 and they are celebrating 4th of July this week with a USA flag in their front yard.

...because they understand what the flag means...

It was not solely devised to represent the Japanese internment camps....or even the struggle described generally as WWII. To those coming here as immigrants, or their children, it represented freedom from oppressive government, and opportunity based on what you could do.

That for a time it flew when those in power made unfortunate decisions is not all that it symbolizes...thank god your folks could see that.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
Are you confident that "most people" includes the ~25% of Southerners who are African-American? Because that seems not to be true for a lot of them. I don't doubt that most modern Southerners who endorse the Confederate Battle Flag do so out of a sense of regional pride instead of racist animosity. But it's not about their intent; it's about the message that symbol sends to the millions of African-Americans in the Deep South; citizens who are supposed to be equal in dignity under state governments that continue to fly the flag, despite its painful history for them.

I'll re-up my hypothetical about New York City adopting the Swastika as its municipal flag. Do you think that would be a legitimate decision for the majority of New Yorkers to make (over the objections of a significant minority)? If not, how is that different from the Confederate Battle Flag?

My comments about "most people" were concerning the Bellamy salute and its association with the Nazis. It wasn't specifically about the Confederate flag, but was (in a general sense) about the issue of how two groups using the same or similar colors, symbols, songs, flags, etc. doesn't necessarily mean they see those things in the same way, use them for the same reasons, or hold the same views as the other group.

Native American tribes who used the swastika long before the Nazis aren't anti-Semitic nor trying to insult Jews by continuing to use the symbol just because the Nazis later corrupted it. Jews might find the symbol itself offensive, but I believe most would be able to discern the difference between its usage by the two groups and understand that the Native Americans using it weren't trying to insult them.

As for the Confederate flag itself, most white Southerners never thought of it nor intended it as a symbol of racism or slavery. Undoubtedly, the Dixiecrats adopted it as a symbol of resistance to civil rights in the 60's and various racist groups have adopted it as a symbol of racist beliefs, but that doesn't mean that those who fly it as a symbol of their history, culture and regional pride should be vilified as holding the same views or beliefs that the racist groups hold just because they've corrupted its use.

To be completely honest, I don't really care one way or the other about the Confederate flag. I don't own one, I'm not a member of any racist group nor do I agree with those groups' views, I was never a typical Southerner nor a "proud son of Dixie" when I lived there, and I haven't lived in the South for several years. I really couldn't care less if SC flies the flag over their state buildings or if Joe down the street has one on his porch.

My issues with this are three-fold. First, the rather hypocritical hand-wringing over a flag from one region and crying about how horrible and hateful it is while turning a blind eye to the fact that state flags from the North and the US flag of the 1700's and early 1800's were flying over areas that were just as deep into slavery. Second, it's a witchhunt to smear innocent people as racist just because they cherish a symbol that was later corrupted and misused by racist groups whose views they never held or agreed with.

Last, but not least, my third issue is that it's PC bullshit run amok. Today it's the Confederate flag. Tomorrow it's shutting down a business because 60 years ago they sold a product whose name later became slang for some racist insult and is now deemed offensive by today's PC standards. Next year it's taking Mark Twain out of every school and library, condemning Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse as racist or offensive to rodents, and banning the showing of Bugs Bunny because during WWII it featured a less than flattering Japanese character.

Not long after that, CBS or NBC will get attacked and vilified because 50 or 60 years ago they portrayed women as only capable of being housewives and moms, thus proving they're horrible misogynists, and people will be wringing their hands crying over how watching Barbara Billingsley bake cookies for Beaver has destroyed their self-esteem and reruns of all such shows should be pulled from the air and the graves of their producers and actors should be desecrated. After that, don't be shocked when people of Greek ancestry claim USC's use of the nickname Trojans is offensive to their people and that any business using red & yellow in their logo is obviously anti-Greek. Wendy's stock will plummet and the business will be lucky to survive the protests and the cost of replacing all their signs.

Silly? Ridiculous? Can't ever happen? Twain's already being pulled from schools. GWTW is being attacked and there are those from major media outlets calling for it to be removed from all outlets. Football teams who adopted Native Americans as mascots out of admiration for their bravery are being castigated as racist now. The Three Stooges and Tom & Jerry are condemned (and scenes cut out) because they "promote violence" (as if even a two-year-old can't tell the difference between slapstick and real violence). Some of the most popular and beloved old movies and TV shows that we all loved and were thought of as nothing but wholesome and good are now being burned on the altar of PC worship because they "promoted stereotypes" or didn't have enough diversity in the cast. When they come for your symbol, church, TV show, favorite author, or whatever else, don't be surprised. Enough of this ridiculous hand-wringing, "I'm offended by your inadvertent microaggression," applying todays values to systems and people from long ago, "I'm a victim and offended by everything" PC bullshit.
 
Last edited:

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
My comments about "most people" were concerning the Bellamy salute and its association with the Nazis. It wasn't specifically about the Confederate flag, but was (in a general sense) about the issue of how two groups using the same or similar colors, symbols, songs, flags, etc. doesn't necessarily mean they see those things in the same way, use them for the same reasons, or hold the same views as the other group.

Native American tribes who used the swastika long before the Nazis aren't anti-Semitic nor trying to insult Jews by continuing to use the symbol just because the Nazis later corrupted it. Jews might find the symbol itself offensive, but I believe most would be able to discern the difference between its usage by the two groups and understand that the Native Americans using it weren't trying to insult them.

As for the Confederate flag itself, most white Southerners never thought of it nor intended it as a symbol of racism or slavery. Undoubtedly, the Dixiecrats adopted it as a symbol of resistance to civil rights in the 60's and various racist groups have adopted it as a symbol of racist beliefs, but that doesn't mean that those who fly it as a symbol of their history, culture and regional pride should be vilified as holding the same views or beliefs that the racist groups hold just because they've corrupted its use.

To be completely honest, I don't really care one way or the other about the Confederate flag. I don't own one, I'm not a member of any racist group nor do I agree with those groups' views, I was never a typical Southerner nor a "proud son of Dixie" when I lived there, and I haven't lived in the South for several years. I really couldn't care less if SC flies the flag over their state buildings or if Joe down the street has one on his porch.

My issues with this are three-fold. First, the rather hypocritical hand-wringing over a flag from one region and crying about how horrible and hateful it is while turning a blind eye to the fact that state flags from the North and the US flag of the 1700's and early 1800's were flying over areas that were just as deep into slavery. Second, it's a witchhunt to smear innocent people as racist just because they cherish a symbol that was later corrupted and misused by racist groups whose views they never held or agreed with.

Last, but not least, my third issue is that it's PC bullshit run amok. Today it's the Confederate flag. Tomorrow it's shutting down a business because 60 years ago they sold a product whose name later became slang for some racist insult and is now deemed offensive by today's PC standards. Next year it's taking Mark Twain out of every school and library, condemning Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse as racist or offensive to rodents, and banning the showing of Bugs Bunny because during WWII it featured a less than flattering Japanese character.

Not long after that, CBS or NBC will get attacked and vilified because 50 or 60 years ago they portrayed women as only capable of being housewives and moms, thus proving they're horrible misogynists, and people will be wringing their hands crying over how watching Barbara Billingsley bake cookies for Beaver has destroyed their self-esteem and reruns of all such shows should be pulled from the air and the graves of their producers and actors should be desecrated. After that, don't be shocked when people of Greek ancestry claim USC's use of the nickname Trojans is offensive to their people and that any business using red & yellow in their logo is obviously anti-Greek. Wendy's stock will plummet and the business will be lucky to survive the protests and the cost of replacing all their signs.

Silly? Ridiculous? Can't ever happen? Twain's already being pulled from schools. GWTW is being attacked and there are those from major media outlets calling for it to be removed from all outlets. Football teams who adopted Native Americans as mascots out of admiration for their bravery are being castigated as racist now. The Three Stooges and Tom & Jerry are condemned (and scenes cut out) because they "promote violence" (as if even a two-year-old can't tell the difference between slapstick and real violence). Some of the most popular and beloved old movies and TV shows that we all loved and were thought of as nothing but wholesome and good are now being burned on the altar of PC worship because they "promoted stereotypes" or didn't have enough diversity in the cast. When they come for your symbol, church, TV show, favorite author, or whatever else, don't be surprised. Enough of this ridiculous hand-wringing, "I'm offended by your inadvertent microaggression," applying todays values to systems and people from long ago, "I'm a victim and offended by everything" PC bullshit.

I share many of your concerns about political correctness (see this AmCon article for why it's basically nothing more than a cynical Marxist power play). But my argument isn't based on political correctness or bien pensant.

I just don't think that Deep Southern states with a significant African-American minority should officially associate themselves with a symbol that is deeply offensive that group. That's all. I wouldn't support a Federal initiative to force them to dissociate from it, or to ban the symbol outright. But if the governments involved actually believe that their African-American citizens are equally dignified and that their concerns are worthy of respect, then why continue to fly that flag? The arguments in favor of it are almost all focused on the intentions of the majority; but that's obviously besides the point. If the dignity of Southern blacks matters, if they're included in the "we, Southerners", then take the flag down and pick a more appropriate symbol for everyone.
 
Last edited:

Redbar

Well-known member
Messages
3,531
Reaction score
806
My comments about "most people" were concerning the Bellamy salute and its association with the Nazis. It wasn't specifically about the Confederate flag, but was (in a general sense) about the issue of how two groups using the same or similar colors, symbols, songs, flags, etc. doesn't necessarily mean they see those things in the same way, use them for the same reasons, or hold the same views as the other group.

Native American tribes who used the swastika long before the Nazis aren't anti-Semitic nor trying to insult Jews by continuing to use the symbol just because the Nazis later corrupted it. Jews might find the symbol itself offensive, but I believe most would be able to discern the difference between its usage by the two groups and understand that the Native Americans using it weren't trying to insult them.

As for the Confederate flag itself, most white Southerners never thought of it nor intended it as a symbol of racism or slavery. Undoubtedly, the Dixiecrats adopted it as a symbol of resistance to civil rights in the 60's and various racist groups have adopted it as a symbol of racist beliefs, but that doesn't mean that those who fly it as a symbol of their history, culture and regional pride should be vilified as holding the same views or beliefs that the racist groups hold just because they've corrupted its use.

To be completely honest, I don't really care one way or the other about the Confederate flag. I don't own one, I'm not a member of any racist group nor do I agree with those groups' views, I was never a typical Southerner nor a "proud son of Dixie" when I lived there, and I haven't lived in the South for several years. I really couldn't care less if SC flies the flag over their state buildings or if Joe down the street has one on his porch.

My issues with this are three-fold. First, the rather hypocritical hand-wringing over a flag from one region and crying about how horrible and hateful it is while turning a blind eye to the fact that state flags from the North and the US flag of the 1700's and early 1800's were flying over areas that were just as deep into slavery. Second, it's a witchhunt to smear innocent people as racist just because they cherish a symbol that was later corrupted and misused by racist groups whose views they never held or agreed with.

Last, but not least, my third issue is that it's PC bullshit run amok. Today it's the Confederate flag. Tomorrow it's shutting down a business because 60 years ago they sold a product whose name later became slang for some racist insult and is now deemed offensive by today's PC standards. Next year it's taking Mark Twain out of every school and library, condemning Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse as racist or offensive to rodents, and banning the showing of Bugs Bunny because during WWII it featured a less than flattering Japanese character.

Not long after that, CBS or NBC will get attacked and vilified because 50 or 60 years ago they portrayed women as only capable of being housewives and moms, thus proving they're horrible misogynists, and people will be wringing their hands crying over how watching Barbara Billingsley bake cookies for Beaver has destroyed their self-esteem and reruns of all such shows should be pulled from the air and the graves of their producers and actors should be desecrated. After that, don't be shocked when people of Greek ancestry claim USC's use of the nickname Trojans is offensive to their people and that any business using red & yellow in their logo is obviously anti-Greek. Wendy's stock will plummet and the business will be lucky to survive the protests and the cost of replacing all their signs.

Silly? Ridiculous? Can't ever happen? Twain's already being pulled from schools. GWTW is being attacked and there are those from major media outlets calling for it to be removed from all outlets. Football teams who adopted Native Americans as mascots out of admiration for their bravery are being castigated as racist now. The Three Stooges and Tom & Jerry are condemned (and scenes cut out) because they "promote violence" (as if even a two-year-old can't tell the difference between slapstick and real violence). Some of the most popular and beloved old movies and TV shows that we all loved and were thought of as nothing but wholesome and good are now being burned on the altar of PC worship because they "promoted stereotypes" or didn't have enough diversity in the cast. When they come for your symbol, church, TV show, favorite author, or whatever else, don't be surprised. Enough of this ridiculous hand-wringing, "I'm offended by your inadvertent microaggression," applying todays values to systems and people from long ago, "I'm a victim and offended by everything" PC bullshit.

I can more or less understand this frustration with what can be seen as a PC movement or agenda. I think in many ways society has become too sensitive and people too easily offended. However, I disagree completely that this issue of the confederate flag is a good place to draw your line in the sand. It is clearly NOT an example of people just willy nilly "overreacting", it isn't liberals, or blacks, or yankees just getting their "britches in a bunch". It is a symbol of one of the most profound instances of "man's inhumanity to man." It was at the very least as barbaric as the Holocaust and it really deserves no defense. We don't need Charlie Daniels to frame this issue for us; the people who designed, flew, and brought back the flag in the 1960's as well as this Roof kid and hate groups around the world's intentions are well documented. Anecdotal evidence from one person's narrow perspective does not balance this equation.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
This thread has become a cyst of obtuse, pustulent posts brought about by the obstruction of several who are incapable of appreciating any position but as apologists for the elitist of the South.

Most southerners are great. Most southerners include a group that is a 25 percent minority group, the descendent of African slaves.

Yes today's southerners are much better and one could even claim that they are less "racist" than elements in the north.

But show me where the majority of not African-American southerners ever supported any tenant of civil rights. Not from Bull's fire hoses and police dogs to Montgomery's public transit. Not once. And no one group had more chances!

Just like yesterday's example of Howard Cosell's comments, I am sure the post "monkey controversy" Howard would have been a better sportscaster than ever. As it was he was the best. And I don't believe that he had a racist bone in his body, but sometimes things have to change, regardless.

I cannot for the life of me fathom what is so important about the battle flag of the Army of Northern Va.!

Because you all realize much more concern has been expressed (here and in many other places) than for the nine victims of a deranged man who wrapped himself in it!
 
Last edited:

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
This thread has become a cyst of obtuse, pustulent posts brought about by the obstruction of several who are incapable of appreciating any position but as apologists for the elitist of the South.

Most southerners are great. Most southerners include a group that is a 25 percent minority group, the descendent of African slaves.

Yes today's southerners are much better and one could even claim that they are less "racist" than elements in the north.

But show me where the majority of not African-American southerners ever supported any tenant of civil rights. Not from Bull's fire hoses and police dogs to Montgomery's public transit. Not once. And no one group had more chances!

Just like yesterday's example of Howard Cosell's comments, I am sure the post "monkey controversy" Howard would have been a better sportscaster than ever. As it was he was the best. And I don't believe that he had a racist bone in his body, but sometimes things have to change, regardless.

I cannot for the life of me fathom what is so important about the battle flag of the Army of Northern Va.!

Because you all realize much more concern has been expressed (here and in many other places) than for the nine victims of a deranged man who wrapped himself in it!

Nonsense...More words have been dedicated, no doubt. But concern and sadness for those 9 was never contested or had words parsed or questioned. There were never alternatives to discuss there. " Unanimous" finds little need for discussion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
This thread has become a cyst of obtuse, pustulent posts brought about by the obstruction of several who are incapable of appreciating any position but as apologists for the elitist of the South.

Most southerners are great. Most southerners include a group that is a 25 percent minority group, the descendent of African slaves.

Yes today's southerners are much better and one could even claim that they are less "racist" than elements in the north.

But show me where the majority of not African-American southerners ever supported any tenant of civil rights. Not from Bull's fire hoses and police dogs to Montgomery's public transit. Not once. And no one group had more chances!

Just like yesterday's example of Howard Cosell's comments, I am sure the post "monkey controversy" Howard would have been a better sportscaster than ever. As it was he was the best. And I don't believe that he had a racist bone in his body, but sometimes things have to change, regardless.

I cannot for the life of me fathom what is so important about the battle flag of the Army of Northern Va.!

Because you all realize much more concern has been expressed (here and in many other places) than for the nine victims of a deranged man who wrapped himself in it!

Nonsense...More words have been dedicated, no doubt. But concern and sadness for those 9 was never contested or had words parsed or questioned. There were never alternatives to discuss there. " Unanimous" finds little need for discussion.

So, would you give up the battle flag to bring the nine back?

Now how do you think that question would play out if asked to the most vehement opposition?
 
C

Cackalacky

Guest
I can more or less understand this frustration with what can be seen as a PC movement or agenda. I think in many ways society has become too sensitive and people too easily offended. However, I disagree completely that this issue of the confederate flag is a good place to draw your line in the sand. It is clearly NOT an example of people just willy nilly "overreacting", it isn't liberals, or blacks, or yankees just getting their "britches in a bunch". It is a symbol of one of the most profound instances of "man's inhumanity to man." It was at the very least as barbaric as the Holocaust and it really deserves no defense. We don't need Charlie Daniels to frame this issue for us; the people who designed, flew, and brought back the flag in the 1960's as well as this Roof kid and hate groups around the world's intentions are well documented. Anecdotal evidence from one person's narrow perspective does not balance this equation.

Aces.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
So, would you give up the battle flag to bring the nine back?

Now how do you think that question would play out if asked to the most vehement opposition?

Hell I gave it up here...many posts ago. My point has been you need to understand intent, and can't assign the racist tag to someone who isn't trying to be. That said I really look at the confederate flag as something where it can be removed if the states/municipalities feel like it turns off a part of their community.

I don't know people that would pick a symbol over lives, but I also feel like carrying on this conversation downgrades my "liberal acceptable" rating on IE because I am still dedicating word count to this controversy...
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
I can more or less understand this frustration with what can be seen as a PC movement or agenda. I think in many ways society has become too sensitive and people too easily offended. However, I disagree completely that this issue of the confederate flag is a good place to draw your line in the sand. It is clearly NOT an example of people just willy nilly "overreacting", it isn't liberals, or blacks, or yankees just getting their "britches in a bunch". It is a symbol of one of the most profound instances of "man's inhumanity to man." It was at the very least as barbaric as the Holocaust and it really deserves no defense. We don't need Charlie Daniels to frame this issue for us; the people who designed, flew, and brought back the flag in the 1960's as well as this Roof kid and hate groups around the world's intentions are well documented. Anecdotal evidence from one person's narrow perspective does not balance this equation.

Bingo.
 
Last edited:

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Sad about the lack of media coverage on the 6 predominately black churches that burned down in the last week. Coincidence, I think not. Media should be ashamed of themselves.

Six predominately black Southern churches burn within a week; arson suspected in at least three - The Washington Post


The article you provided has links to about a half dozen media outlets, TV and newsprint that covered the stories. I googled "Arson at Southern Black Churches" and got a variety of hits including one in the Huff Post two days ago. The various articles mention involvement and/or quotes from LEOs, FBI, ATF, and Southern Poverty Law Center. Suspected Arson was mentioned, I believe, at 3 of the fires. I also believe I read that a hate crime was not under consideration in a couple of them and don't recall hate crime being a part of any of them at this time nor was there any mention of conspiracy.

Nor was there any mention of Al getting on a plane to demand DOJ investigations.

Did you want the media to drop the stories on the 3 week manhunt, Amazing Grace, Funerals and Memorials, Greece Default and the world markets, Puerto Rico's default, Wall St Gaines for the year wiped out, Isis attacks in multiple countries, and a Homeland Security Alert in the U.S.

Despite the news cycle being pretty busy the media does seemed to have covered the story appropriately so far. I suspect they'll have more when the investigating agencies track down leads and actually have some information to release.
 
Top