We also had our front seven playing out of position last year. Each and every one of them, with the exception of maybe Ian Williams, yet I make the case that he did an incredible job as a frosh in the 3-4 and then saw a decline in productivity. Ethan Johnson is a 3-4 DE who was asked to play the 3 technique undersized. KLM is a 3-4 DE who was playing DE in a 4-3. You could argue it is still the DE position, yet the requirements are drastically different in a 4-3 than a 3-4, and that isn't even getting into an attacking 4-3 and a no crease 3-4. Manti is an ILB and was playing outside. Brian Smith is an OLB who was playing inside. Fleming was playing a 4-3 DE when he should have been at OLB. Now on to Cincy
Cincy replaced 10 of their 11 starters on defense last year, and still finished better in those categories than the Irish last season. Now the obvious argument is that they did that with a much less "talented" roster. All that means is that the potential at Notre Dame is greater, and I think that, if you examine both teams, you would come to the conclusion that Notre Dame has better athletes, but not football players, and that is apparent from the statistics. Now the variable which will carry over and allow us to perform this experiment is Kelly, Longo, and Diaco. Those gentlemen produced our Exhibit A in Cincinnati, and now will give us Exhibit B to compare at Notre Dame. We can't really have a control group, but we'll make due.
Ultimately, we will see this year just how important coaching was at both universities. Notre Dame will be aided in the fact that they will be transitioning back to the 3-4, where their players fit more naturally, and they have the majority of them back. We'll have to wait until the season to scientifically measure your questions Reggie Bush. Even if we don't get the desired results, we can just say it was his first year and give BK a few more. ;D