Decommitment Tracker

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,010
Reaction score
5,048
Michigan is doing well enough to push out knights? Damn, that's disappointing
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
From Tom Haverford's post in our Skunkbear topic:
sad thing is, there never is any back-lash if the coaches win.

Saban has done stuff like this. So has Meyer. Les Miles took it even a step further when he pulled the scholarship of an early enrollee to make room for a 5* recruit on signing day. Kid was at LSU enrolled then told sorry, you don't have a scholarship here anymore. Imagine that. Les should've been crucified for that, but nothing.

Michigan decommitments updated to

Erik Swenson (commit 12/25/13)
D'ele Harding (commit 10/31/14)
David Reese (commit 4/4)
Matthew Falcon (commit 4/8)
Kiante Enis (commit 6/4)
Antwaine Richardson (commit 6/12
Victor Viramontes (commit 6/15)
Messiah deWeaver (commit 6/18)
Sir Patrick Scott (commit 8/2)

Other possibilities:
Dytarious Johnson (commit 6/6)
Rashad Weaver (commit 6/14)
 
Last edited:

ResLife Hero

Well-known member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
190
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here's a stat for you.

There have already been 66 FBS decommitments (including a flip as a decommit) from January 1 until today.....</p>— Tom VanHaaren (@TomVH) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomVH/status/690281333688569860">January 21, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here's a stat for you.

There have already been 66 FBS decommitments (including a flip as a decommit) from January 1 until today.....</p>— Tom VanHaaren (@TomVH) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomVH/status/690281333688569860">January 21, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Thanks. My list of selected teams and including pre-Jan 1 is over 100.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Alabama decommitments

Alabama decommitments

As has been noted, Riley Cole 3* decommitted on Jan 31 due to grayshirt offer. Cole committed in June. Cole had his OV to Alabama two weeks ago. He has signed with South Alabama.

Other Alabama decommits yesterday:

Joshua Perry, 3* DB, committed since May, decommitted yesterday. Perry has his OV to Alabama two weeks ago. He has signed with Memphis.

Brendan Scales, 3* TE, decommitted yesterday and signed with Missouri. He had his OV to Alabama two weeks ago, then set up an OV to Missouri. Father says Alabama offered his a grayshirt. Scales committed to Alabama last April.
 
Last edited:

nsisk157

Well-known member
Messages
953
Reaction score
265
I can't comprehend how a HC can live with "gray shirting." It is utterly immoral, IMO.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
First, this is an awesome thread that provides a different view of recruiting. It should be mandatory reading for any fan of any school that bitches about their recruiting, except for Oregon. Their class truly does suck. And you can tell that self-fucking, pencil-necked con man masquerading as a journalist, I said so! Oh, and while you are talking to him, ask him how Blake Barnett is doing! Mu-ha-ha! #noquotesneeded

I can't comprehend how a HC can live with "gray shirting." It is utterly immoral, IMO.

Yes, that is true. But a big time school like Alabama, is so great and mighty that they can apply for and receive the corporation amorality exemption from sound ethical operation. Check the bylaws and see for yourself.

I am sure from their perspective, morality dictates that they operate for the greater good, and would be immoral, as well as downright un-American, and maybe a little pink-o around the edges, if they didn't do everything they could to bend the rules and get a sixth national championship is like nine years.


But apparently grey-shirting pales by comparison to deceptive recruiting. It wasn't what Florida State did to get this recruit, or what they intentionally did to their rivals UF, but the absolute cock sure way they admitted it. Almost with pride, as well as an air of total impunity!

Fuck State University! Fuck Criminoles. FSU where more than players are Criminoles!
 
Last edited:

Quinntastic

IE's Microbiologist
Messages
1,036
Reaction score
111
How is "decommitting" even a thing? Doesn't that go against the very definition of the word "commit" in the first place? Why would a player even be able to "commit" to a school if there is any possibility to go back and "decommit" later?

It does not compute.
 

Irish YJ

Southsida
Messages
25,888
Reaction score
1,444
How is "decommitting" even a thing? Doesn't that go against the very definition of the word "commit" in the first place? Why would a player even be able to "commit" to a school if there is any possibility to go back and "decommit" later?

It does not compute.

When Rhode gets out of the psych ward, is he decommitted?
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
How is "decommitting" even a thing? Doesn't that go against the very definition of the word "commit" in the first place? Why would a player even be able to "commit" to a school if there is any possibility to go back and "decommit" later?

It does not compute.

I thought this was interesting.

The short answer is commit is a noun. Being a noun it is a finite thing, completely and totally quantifiable. Therefore, it has a beginning and an end. The beginning is the act of committal. What else can the end be, other than a state of going from commitment to non-commitment. And, of course since commitment is a 'state,' there is of necessity an opposite state, naturally. So then how to name this shift between the state and its absence?

I did a little research. Commit is a noun with a meaning, to perpetrate or carry out [with an object,] or dedicated to, and finally to pledge or bind.

Commitment means :

Definition of commitment

1) a/an act of committing to a charge or trust: as (1) : a consignment to a penal or mental institution (2) : an act of referring a matter to a legislative committee

2) a/an agreement or pledge to do something in the future; especially : an engagement to assume a financial obligation at a future date
b : something pledged​
c : the state or an instance of being obligated or emotionally impelled​

adjective

1Not committed to a cause, activity, etc.
‘uncommitted voters’

And remember both recommit and recommitment are accepted grammar.

Now we come to recommitment :

1Commit again:
‘it should deter corporations from recommitting the same offence’
‘we must recommit ourselves to this important mission’

The problem is that each of the words related to commit are defined as nouns. So, if we want to change the language by 'verb-acide.' (impact comes to mind. It is another noun expressly that was popularized in use as an action, or verb. i.e., It impacted the bottom line.,) We see that commitment would be the best choice. It could be used as a noun without an object, properly, and with a 'de' could fill the role of a noun, adjective, or verb.

So 'decommitment' would be the act of changing the state of commitment. Sometimes we need new words, but they can follow the rules, too!
 
Last edited:

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
Apparently Bogs has a bit too much time on his hands

Just kidding big guy...Happy Monday!
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Apparently Bogs has a bit too much time on his hands

Just kidding big guy...Happy Monday!

I have too much of something in my hands!

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/816ZQm9Ir3U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
I thought this was interesting.

The short answer is commit is a noun. Being a noun it is a finite thing, completely and totally quantifiable. Therefore, it has a beginning and an end. The beginning is the act of committal. What else can the end be, other than a state of going from commitment to non-commitment. And, of course since commitment is a 'state,' there is of necessity an opposite state, naturally. So then how to name this shift between the state and its absence?

I did a little research. Commit is a noun with a meaning, to perpetrate or carry out [with an object,] or dedicated to, and finally to pledge or bind.

Commitment means :
Definition of commitment

1) a/an act of committing to a charge or trust: as (1) : a consignment to a penal or mental institution (2) : an act of referring a matter to a legislative committee

2) a/an agreement or pledge to do something in the future; especially : an engagement to assume a financial obligation at a future date
b : something pledged
c : the state or an instance of being obligated or emotionally impelled
adjective

1Not committed to a cause, activity, etc.
‘uncommitted voters’



And remember both recommit and recommitment are accepted grammar.

Now we come to recommitment :
1Commit again:
‘it should deter corporations from recommitting the same offence’


‘we must recommit ourselves to this important mission’

The problem is that each of the words related to commit are defined as nouns. So, if we want to change the language by 'verb-acide.' (impact comes to mind. It is another noun expressly that was popularized in use as an action, or verb. i.e., It impacted the bottom line.,) We see that commitment would be the best choice. It could be used as a noun without an object, properly, and with a 'de' could fill the role of a noun, adjective, or verb.

So 'decommitment' would be the act of changing the state of commitment. Sometimes we need new words, but they can follow the rules, too!

If commitment is a state and finite like existence or consciousness of existence, then decommitment is returning to the absence of that state while still existing. Decommitment returns the recruit to a transitive consciousness with the object of commitment. This second type of consciousness is seen more frequently in Michigan verbal commits as they become aware of the head coach's lack of conscienceness. This results in a new noun added to our vocabulary - Harbaughcide.

I believe 247 added "Decommitments" to their drop down boxes of Targets, Offers, Visits, Commits. That will make these easier to track. Michigan Decommits 2016
 
Last edited:
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
If commitment is a state and finite like existence or consciousness of existence, then decommitment is returning to the absence of that state while still existing. Decommitment returns the recruit to a transitive consciousness with the object of commitment. This second type of consciousness is seen more frequently in Michigan verbal commits as they become aware of the head coach's lack of conscienceness. This results in a new noun added to our vocabulary - Harbaughcide.

I believe 247 added "Decommitments" to their drop down boxes of Targets, Offers, Visits, Commits. That will make these easier to track. Michigan Decommits 2016

I like this logic so much, I will not disagree. I will refrain from pointing out that decomittment is not a state, as in it cannot be maintained, it is a temporary act; except you brought up the perfect exception to the rule. And it is so stunning and accurate, that I am in awe.

Your understanding and use of the totally fucked state of mind of anyone that would commit to that sack of cow pie filled testament Walmart ruining America, is brilliant! Reps, Master Legacy!

Oh, yeah -- and, FUCK MICHIGAN!

4. Michigan Wolverines

Like Miami, there was once a time when Michigan was probably the most hated team in America. With Jim Harbaugh in town, they could be on their way again.

P.S. On each list it says :
Decommit

1/20/2016

19 schools
 
Last edited:

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Signee Spotlight: The story of Jordan Elliott's wild recruitment

To call Jordan Elliott’s recruitment a roller coaster would be an understatement.

In fact, by the end of it, Elliott’s mom, Tamara Dean, labeled the process a “nightmare” and called it “one big saga.” Elliott, an elite defensive tackle from Houston Westside, had 40 offers for football, and by National Signing Day he’d committed to nearly half the schools. OK, not quite, but Elliott did pledge to four different programs on five different occasions.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
2017 Class Decommits (All 4 or 5 stars unless noted)

Miami - 8 (7 were 3 stars; 3 decommited prior to NSD 2/16)
Alabama - 4
Georgia, Tenn, USC - 3
LSU - 2
Florida State, Florida, ND, Mich, Ohio St, TCU, South Carolina - 1 (TCU - 1 3 star)
Clemson, Texas, Stanford, Ole Miss - 0
 
Last edited:

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
2017 Class Decommits (All 4 or 5 stars unless noted)

Miami - 8 (7 were 3 stars; 3 decommited prior to NSD 2/16)
Alabama - 4
Georgia, Tenn, USC - 3
LSU - 2
Florida State, Florida, ND, Mich, Ohio St, TCU, South Carolina - 1 (TCU - 1 3 star)
Clemson, Texas, Stanford, Ole Miss - 0

If Beal were to re-commit, would it still count against us or get wiped out?
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Baylor has lost half (11) its class (22) of 2016.
Released from NLI.
 

texbender

Well-known member
Messages
3,658
Reaction score
378
Baylor has lost half (11) its class (22) of 2016.
Released from NLI.
and 4 have ended up at Texas...the biggest winner, as Briles' demise will shuffle BU back down the Big 12 pole for some time to come. Big opportunity that Strong has to capitalize on, or else.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
and 4 have ended up at Texas...the biggest winner, as Briles' demise will shuffle BU back down the Big 12 pole for some time to come. Big opportunity that Strong has to capitalize on, or else.

As if UT needed any help to get back in the "Top 4 football program" category, now they get the added luxury of 2 of their 3 biggest rivals going into simultaneous crisis. I tell you...

16suob.jpg
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,010
Reaction score
5,048
I had a coworker try to tell me today that he doesn't like Notre Dame's chances in Austin. I'm still laughing.
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
I had a coworker try to tell me today that he doesn't like Notre Dame's chances in Austin. I'm still laughing.



I think it's going to be a really tough game. I'd be happy to get out of there with a 3 pt win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
I think it's going to be a really tough game. I'd be happy to get out of there with a 3 pt win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A P5 win on the road is always good. A win over a blueblood on the road is better. Covering against a blueblood on the road when your expected to and need it to keep the talking heads and selection committee happy is sadly a must. It's best if the Irish cover but don't think for a second that this game isn't circled after last year's Malikapalooza in South Bend.
 

irishandy

Well-known member
Messages
4,340
Reaction score
1,962
I had a coworker try to tell me today that he doesn't like Notre Dame's chances in Austin. I'm still laughing.

I think it would be more of a game if we were playing them in the middle of the season. I don't see it being another blow out game like last year, but ND will get a W in Austin.
 
Top